These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

5132 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16632515)

  • 1. Adjusting batch effects in microarray expression data using empirical Bayes methods.
    Johnson WE; Li C; Rabinovic A
    Biostatistics; 2007 Jan; 8(1):118-27. PubMed ID: 16632515
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Alternative empirical Bayes models for adjusting for batch effects in genomic studies.
    Zhang Y; Jenkins DF; Manimaran S; Johnson WE
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2018 Jul; 19(1):262. PubMed ID: 30001694
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Empirical Bayes accomodation of batch-effects in microarray data using identical replicate reference samples: application to RNA expression profiling of blood from Duchenne muscular dystrophy patients.
    Walker WL; Liao IH; Gilbert DL; Wong B; Pollard KS; McCulloch CE; Lit L; Sharp FR
    BMC Genomics; 2008 Oct; 9():494. PubMed ID: 18937867
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Batch effect reduction of microarray data with dependent samples using an empirical Bayes approach (BRIDGE).
    Xia Q; Thompson JA; Koestler DC
    Stat Appl Genet Mol Biol; 2021 Dec; 20(4-6):101-119. PubMed ID: 34905304
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Intensity-based hierarchical Bayes method improves testing for differentially expressed genes in microarray experiments.
    Sartor MA; Tomlinson CR; Wesselkamper SC; Sivaganesan S; Leikauf GD; Medvedovic M
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2006 Dec; 7():538. PubMed ID: 17177995
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Empirical Bayes screening of many p-values with applications to microarray studies.
    Datta S; Datta S
    Bioinformatics; 2005 May; 21(9):1987-94. PubMed ID: 15691856
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Estimating effect sizes of differentially expressed genes for power and sample-size assessments in microarray experiments.
    Matsui S; Noma H
    Biometrics; 2011 Dec; 67(4):1225-35. PubMed ID: 21627629
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Assessing differential expression in two-color microarrays: a resampling-based empirical Bayes approach.
    Li D; Le Pape MA; Parikh NI; Chen WX; Dye TD
    PLoS One; 2013; 8(11):e80099. PubMed ID: 24312198
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Empirical Bayes ranking and selection methods via semiparametric hierarchical mixture models in microarray studies.
    Noma H; Matsui S
    Stat Med; 2013 May; 32(11):1904-16. PubMed ID: 23281021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A powerful Bayesian meta-analysis method to integrate multiple gene set enrichment studies.
    Chen M; Zang M; Wang X; Xiao G
    Bioinformatics; 2013 Apr; 29(7):862-9. PubMed ID: 23418184
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. An empirical Bayes' approach to joint analysis of multiple microarray gene expression studies.
    Ruan L; Yuan M
    Biometrics; 2011 Dec; 67(4):1617-26. PubMed ID: 21517790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Prior robust empirical Bayes inference for large-scale data by conditioning on rank with application to microarray data.
    Liao JG; McMurry T; Berg A
    Biostatistics; 2014 Jan; 15(1):60-73. PubMed ID: 23934072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. β-empirical Bayes inference and model diagnosis of microarray data.
    Mollah MM; Mollah MN; Kishino H
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2012 Jun; 13():135. PubMed ID: 22713095
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Frozen robust multiarray analysis (fRMA).
    McCall MN; Bolstad BM; Irizarry RA
    Biostatistics; 2010 Apr; 11(2):242-53. PubMed ID: 20097884
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. ChipInfo: Software for extracting gene annotation and gene ontology information for microarray analysis.
    Zhong S; Li C; Wong WH
    Nucleic Acids Res; 2003 Jul; 31(13):3483-6. PubMed ID: 12824349
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Removing batch effects in analysis of expression microarray data: an evaluation of six batch adjustment methods.
    Chen C; Grennan K; Badner J; Zhang D; Gershon E; Jin L; Liu C
    PLoS One; 2011 Feb; 6(2):e17238. PubMed ID: 21386892
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Correcting for intra-experiment variation in Illumina BeadChip data is necessary to generate robust gene-expression profiles.
    Kitchen RR; Sabine VS; Sims AH; Macaskill EJ; Renshaw L; Thomas JS; van Hemert JI; Dixon JM; Bartlett JM
    BMC Genomics; 2010 Feb; 11():134. PubMed ID: 20181233
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Practical FDR-based sample size calculations in microarray experiments.
    Hu J; Zou F; Wright FA
    Bioinformatics; 2005 Aug; 21(15):3264-72. PubMed ID: 15932903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The latent process decomposition of cDNA microarray data sets.
    Rogers S; Girolami M; Campbell C; Breitling R
    IEEE/ACM Trans Comput Biol Bioinform; 2005; 2(2):143-56. PubMed ID: 17044179
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. An empirical bayes adjustment to increase the sensitivity of detecting differentially expressed genes in microarray experiments.
    Datta S; Satten GA; Benos DJ; Xia J; Heslin MJ; Datta S
    Bioinformatics; 2004 Jan; 20(2):235-42. PubMed ID: 14734315
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 257.