111 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16632624)
1. Optical density variations in CT films and their effect on image quality.
Tsalafoutas IA; Papoutsis GV; Maniatis PN; Gogos KA
Br J Radiol; 2006 May; 79(941):425-31. PubMed ID: 16632624
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Quality control of a laser camera with the SMPTE test pattern: optical density variations with printing format and frame position.
Tsalafoutas IA; Tsapaki V; Koulentianos E; Triantopoulou C
Br J Radiol; 2004 Jan; 77(913):52-6. PubMed ID: 14988139
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Optical density changes in dry-processed films.
Al Khalifah K; Brindhaban A; Al Baloul G; Al Bather F; Abdulgafoor M
Radiol Technol; 2007; 79(1):9-16. PubMed ID: 17848529
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Monthly monitoring program on DryView laser imager: one year experience on five Imation units.
Lu ZF; Nickoloff EL; Terilli T
Med Phys; 1999 Sep; 26(9):1817-21. PubMed ID: 10505869
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Quantitative optical densitometry with scanning-laser film digitizers.
Dempsey JF; Low DA; Kirov AS; Williamson JF
Med Phys; 1999 Aug; 26(8):1721-31. PubMed ID: 10501072
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [Quality assurance through constancy control for x-ray film processors (author's transl)].
Weberling R
Rontgenblatter; 1982 Jun; 35(6):248-54. PubMed ID: 7089438
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Computed radiography printing problems: a quantitative, observer-independent solution.
Hildestad CA; Morin RL
J Digit Imaging; 2000 May; 13(2 Suppl 1):43-4. PubMed ID: 10847360
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Assessment of the quality of radiographic medical films and chemicals for photochemical treatment].
Larionov VN; Leont'ev VG; Kalashnikova LN
Med Tekh; 2001; (6):31-4. PubMed ID: 11837193
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Analysis of optical density and contrast in mammograms.
Meeson S; Young KC; Ramsdale ML; Wallis MG; Cooke J
Br J Radiol; 1999 Jul; 72(859):670-7. PubMed ID: 10624324
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [Image quality of paper prints compared to film copies in CT investigations].
Bley T; Burger D; Ghanem N; Thürl C; Saueressig U; Kotter E; Langer M
Rofo; 2002 Apr; 174(4):423-5. PubMed ID: 11960403
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Effect of film-based versus filmless operation on the productivity of CT technologists.
Reiner BI; Siegel EL; Hooper FJ; Glasser D
Radiology; 1998 May; 207(2):481-5. PubMed ID: 9577498
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A pilot study on the quality control of film processing in medical radiology laboratories in Greece.
Hourdakis CJ- ; Delakis J; Kamenopoulou V; Balougias H; Papageorgiou E
Eur J Radiol; 2000 Jan; 33(1):24-31. PubMed ID: 10674786
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Features of the maintenance of automated developing machines].
Koveshnikov AI
Med Tekh; 1999; (2):28-33. PubMed ID: 10335507
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Image quality and breast dose of 24 screen-film combinations for mammography.
Dimakopoulou AD; Tsalafoutas IA; Georgiou EK; Yakoumakis EN
Br J Radiol; 2006 Feb; 79(938):123-9. PubMed ID: 16489193
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The laser film digitizer: density, contrast, and resolution.
Teslow TN
J Digit Imaging; 1997 Aug; 10(3 Suppl 1):128-32. PubMed ID: 9268857
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A quality control programme for medical X-ray films in India.
Sharma R; Sharma SD
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2012 Jan; 148(1):51-7. PubMed ID: 21345880
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The stability of dry and wet laser imaging systems.
AlKhalifah K; Brindhaban A; Al-Ali H; Alhuraibi A
Radiol Technol; 2005; 76(3):192-6. PubMed ID: 15732890
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Dry view laser imager--a new economical photothermal imaging method].
Weberling R
Aktuelle Radiol; 1996 Nov; 6(6):355-60. PubMed ID: 9081413
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Clinical assessment of dry laser-processed film versus traditional wet-processed film with computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, and ultrasound.
Krupinski EA
Acad Radiol; 1996 Oct; 3(10):855-8. PubMed ID: 8923905
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The performance of an optical cone-beam CT scanner adapted for radiochromic film dosimetry.
Babic S; Jordan K
Phys Med Biol; 2012 Nov; 57(21):N377-89. PubMed ID: 23073219
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
