These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

108 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16632624)

  • 41. Imaging: new versus traditional technological aids.
    Sanderink GC
    Int Dent J; 1993 Aug; 43(4):335-42. PubMed ID: 8276517
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. An evaluation of the signal and noise characteristics of four CCD-based film digitizers.
    Hangiandreou NJ; O'Connor TJ; Felmlee JP
    Med Phys; 1998 Oct; 25(10):2020-6. PubMed ID: 9800711
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Quality assurance for abdominal CT: a rapid, computer-assisted technique.
    Pomerantz SM; Daly B; Krebs TL; NessAiver M; Kepes SY; Wong JJ; Severson M; Siegler C
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1996 Nov; 167(5):1141-5. PubMed ID: 8911167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. [Control of film processing and dark room lighting].
    von Volkmann T
    Strahlenschutz Forsch Prax; 1986; 27():54-66. PubMed ID: 3705127
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. A quality control program for cine radiography.
    Renaud L; Morissette R
    J Can Assoc Radiol; 1984 Dec; 35(4):380-2. PubMed ID: 6526849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Optimizing optical density of a Kodak mammography film-screen combination with standard-cycle processing.
    McParland BJ; Boyd MM; al Yousef K
    Br J Radiol; 1998 Sep; 71(849):950-3. PubMed ID: 10195010
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. [Development of the automatic dental X-ray film processor].
    Bai J; Chen H
    Zhongguo Yi Liao Qi Xie Za Zhi; 1999 Jul; 23(4):214-6. PubMed ID: 12583065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Analog image recording using a laser printer and paper system.
    Cox GG; Johnson JA; Templeton AW; Preston DF; Lee KR; Nelson DL; Hensley KS; Dwyer SJ
    Invest Radiol; 1985 Dec; 20(9):1003-7. PubMed ID: 3908385
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Absorbed dose in AgBr in direct film for photon energies ( < 150 keV): relation to optical density. Theoretical calculation and experimental evaluation.
    Helmrot E; Alm Carlsson G
    Acta Radiol Suppl; 1996; 402():1-50. PubMed ID: 8677807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Dry versus conventional laser imagers: film properties and image quality.
    Gahleitner A; Kreuzer S; Schick S; Nowotny R; Breitenseher M; Solar P; Czerny C; Lang T; Imhof H
    Radiology; 1999 Mar; 210(3):871-5. PubMed ID: 10207495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Maintenance of automatic dental film processors.
    Thunthy KH
    LDA J; 1996; 55(4):12-3. PubMed ID: 9569822
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Evaluation of radiographic image quality parameters obtained with the REX simulator.
    Magalhaes LA; Drexler GG; deAlmeida CE
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2011 Nov; 147(4):614-8. PubMed ID: 21273198
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Sensitometric comparison of speed group E and F dental radiographic films.
    Geist JR; Brand JW
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2001 May; 30(3):147-52. PubMed ID: 11420626
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. [PC-assisted network for quality control in film development].
    Buchberger W; Giacomuzzi SM; Springer P
    Aktuelle Radiol; 1996 Nov; 6(6):341-3. PubMed ID: 9081409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Implementation of the European protocol for quality control of the technical aspects of mammography screening in Bulgaria.
    Vassileva J; Avramova-Cholakova S; Dimov A; Lichev A
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 114(1-3):403-5. PubMed ID: 15933146
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Effect of x-ray tube parameters and iodine concentration on image quality and radiation dose in cerebral pediatric and adult CT angiography: a phantom study.
    Papadakis AE; Perisinakis K; Raissaki M; Damilakis J
    Invest Radiol; 2013 Apr; 48(4):192-9. PubMed ID: 23344518
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Variation of the sensitometric characteristics of seven mammographic films with processing conditions.
    Tsalafoutas IA; Dimakopoulou AD; Koulentianos ED; Serefoglou AN; Yakoumakis EN
    Br J Radiol; 2004 Aug; 77(920):666-71. PubMed ID: 15326045
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Film quality in image intensifier photofluorography.
    Wihed A; Reichmann S
    Acta Radiol Diagn (Stockh); 1981; 22(3A):289-94. PubMed ID: 7315507
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. [Quality control in computed tomography].
    Rockstroh G; Lieberenz S; Straubel U
    Radiol Diagn (Berl); 1989; 30(3):339-45. PubMed ID: 2798824
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Novel monochromatic optical density meter.
    Dumville J; Clark DJ; Byrne PO
    J Biomed Eng; 1993 Jul; 15(4):308-10. PubMed ID: 8361155
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.