336 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16633220)
1. Correlation between intraocular pressure, central corneal thickness, stage of glaucoma, and demographic patient data: prospective analysis of biophysical parameters in tertiary glaucoma practice populations.
Kniestedt C; Lin S; Choe J; Nee M; Bostrom A; Stürmer J; Stamper RL
J Glaucoma; 2006 Apr; 15(2):91-7. PubMed ID: 16633220
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of dynamic contour tonometry and goldmann applanation tonometry in glaucoma patients and healthy subjects.
Barleon L; Hoffmann EM; Berres M; Pfeiffer N; Grus FH
Am J Ophthalmol; 2006 Oct; 142(4):583-90. PubMed ID: 17011849
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Intraocular pressure and ocular pulse amplitude comparisons in different types of glaucoma using dynamic contour tonometry.
Punjabi OS; Ho HK; Kniestedt C; Bostrom AG; Stamper RL; Lin SC
Curr Eye Res; 2006 Oct; 31(10):851-62. PubMed ID: 17050277
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [Dynamic Contour Tonometry and Goldmann Applanation Tonometry: Difference of Intraocular Pressure Values Between Eyes with and without Glaucomatous Damage in Thin Corneas].
Umurhan Akkan JC; Akkan F; Sezgin Akcay BI; Ayintap E; Tuncer K
Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 2015 Oct; 232(10):1190-7. PubMed ID: 26512850
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Clinical comparison of contour and applanation tonometry and their relationship to pachymetry.
Kniestedt C; Lin S; Choe J; Bostrom A; Nee M; Stamper RL
Arch Ophthalmol; 2005 Nov; 123(11):1532-7. PubMed ID: 16286615
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Dynamic contour tonometry in primary open angle glaucoma and pseudoexfoliation glaucoma: factors associated with intraocular pressure and ocular pulse amplitude.
Moghimi S; Torabi H; Fakhraie G; Nassiri N; Mohammadi M
Middle East Afr J Ophthalmol; 2013; 20(2):158-62. PubMed ID: 23741135
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Relationship between corneal biomechanical properties, central corneal thickness, and intraocular pressure across the spectrum of glaucoma.
Kaushik S; Pandav SS; Banger A; Aggarwal K; Gupta A
Am J Ophthalmol; 2012 May; 153(5):840-849.e2. PubMed ID: 22310080
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Intraocular pressure measurement-comparison of dynamic contour tonometry and goldmann applanation tonometry.
Schneider E; Grehn F
J Glaucoma; 2006 Feb; 15(1):2-6. PubMed ID: 16378009
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of dynamic contour tonometry and goldmann applanation tonometry in African American subjects.
Medeiros FA; Sample PA; Weinreb RN
Ophthalmology; 2007 Apr; 114(4):658-65. PubMed ID: 17141320
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparisons between Pascal dynamic contour tonometry, the TonoPen, and Goldmann applanation tonometry in patients with glaucoma.
Salvetat ML; Zeppieri M; Tosoni C; Brusini P
Acta Ophthalmol Scand; 2007 May; 85(3):272-9. PubMed ID: 17488456
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Effects of corneal thickness, corneal curvature, and intraocular pressure level on Goldmann applanation tonometry and dynamic contour tonometry.
Francis BA; Hsieh A; Lai MY; Chopra V; Pena F; Azen S; Varma R;
Ophthalmology; 2007 Jan; 114(1):20-6. PubMed ID: 17070592
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Correlation between Central Corneal Thickness and Intraocular Pressure Measured by Goldmann Applanation Tonometry or Pascal Dynamic Contour Tonometry.
Katsimpris JM; Theoulakis PE; Vasilopoulos K; Skourtis G; Papadopoulos GE; Petropoulos IK
Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 2015 Apr; 232(4):414-8. PubMed ID: 25902089
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Intraocular pressure, Goldmann applanation tension, corneal thickness, and corneal curvature in Caucasians, Asians, Hispanics, and African Americans.
Shimmyo M; Ross AJ; Moy A; Mostafavi R
Am J Ophthalmol; 2003 Oct; 136(4):603-13. PubMed ID: 14516799
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Central corneal thickness, tonometry, and ocular dimensions in glaucoma and ocular hypertension.
Singh RP; Goldberg I; Graham SL; Sharma A; Mohsin M
J Glaucoma; 2001 Jun; 10(3):206-10. PubMed ID: 11442184
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of ICare, dynamic contour tonometer, and ocular response analyzer with Goldmann applanation tonometer in patients with glaucoma.
Vandewalle E; Vandenbroeck S; Stalmans I; Zeyen T
Eur J Ophthalmol; 2009; 19(5):783-9. PubMed ID: 19787598
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Effect of central corneal thickness on intraocular pressure and comparison of Topcon CT-80 non-contact tonometry with Goldmann applanation tonometry.
Mansoori T; Balakrishna N
Clin Exp Optom; 2018 Mar; 101(2):206-212. PubMed ID: 29044716
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Effect of corneal thickness on dynamic contour, rebound, and goldmann tonometry.
Martinez-de-la-Casa JM; Garcia-Feijoo J; Vico E; Fernandez-Vidal A; Benitez del Castillo JM; Wasfi M; Garcia-Sanchez J
Ophthalmology; 2006 Dec; 113(12):2156-62. PubMed ID: 16996599
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. IOP measured by dynamic contour tonometry correlates with IOP measured by Goldmann applanation tonometry and non-contact tonometry in Japanese individuals.
Ito K; Tawara A; Kubota T; Harada Y
J Glaucoma; 2012 Jan; 21(1):35-40. PubMed ID: 21173706
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Effects of central corneal thickness and corneal curvature on the intraocular pressure measurement by Goldmann applanation tonometer and ocular blood flow pneumatonometer.
Saleh TA; Adams M; McDermott B; Claridge KG; Ewings P
Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2006 Aug; 34(6):516-20. PubMed ID: 16925697
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Intraocular pressure adjusted for central corneal thickness as a screening tool for open-angle glaucoma in an at-risk population.
de Saint Sardos A; Kamdeu Fansi A; Chagnon M; Harasymowycz PJ
Can J Ophthalmol; 2009 Oct; 44(5):571-5. PubMed ID: 19789594
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
