These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
148 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16633227)
1. Repeatability of normal multifocal VEP: implications for detecting progression. Fortune B; Demirel S; Zhang X; Hood DC; Johnson CA J Glaucoma; 2006 Apr; 15(2):131-41. PubMed ID: 16633227 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparing multifocal VEP and standard automated perimetry in high-risk ocular hypertension and early glaucoma. Fortune B; Demirel S; Zhang X; Hood DC; Patterson E; Jamil A; Mansberger SL; Cioffi GA; Johnson CA Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2007 Mar; 48(3):1173-80. PubMed ID: 17325161 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Detecting early to mild glaucomatous damage: a comparison of the multifocal VEP and automated perimetry. Hood DC; Thienprasiddhi P; Greenstein VC; Winn BJ; Ohri N; Liebmann JM; Ritch R Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2004 Feb; 45(2):492-8. PubMed ID: 14744890 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Multifocal VEP and ganglion cell damage: applications and limitations for the study of glaucoma. Hood DC; Greenstein VC Prog Retin Eye Res; 2003 Mar; 22(2):201-51. PubMed ID: 12604058 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Normative ranges and specificity of the multifocal VEP. Fortune B; Zhang X; Hood DC; Demirel S; Johnson CA Doc Ophthalmol; 2004 Jul; 109(1):87-100. PubMed ID: 15675203 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Multifocal visual evoked potential responses in glaucoma patients with unilateral hemifield defects. Thienprasiddhi P; Greenstein VC; Chen CS; Liebmann JM; Ritch R; Hood DC Am J Ophthalmol; 2003 Jul; 136(1):34-40. PubMed ID: 12834667 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Detecting early functional damage in glaucoma suspect and ocular hypertensive patients with the multifocal VEP technique. Thienprasiddhi P; Greenstein VC; Chu DH; Xu L; Liebmann JM; Ritch R; Hood DC J Glaucoma; 2006 Aug; 15(4):321-7. PubMed ID: 16865010 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Multifocal blue-on-yellow visual evoked potentials in early glaucoma. Klistorner A; Graham SL; Martins A; Grigg JR; Arvind H; Kumar RS; James AC; Billson FA Ophthalmology; 2007 Sep; 114(9):1613-21. PubMed ID: 17822971 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Detecting glaucomatous damage with multifocal visual evoked potentials: how can a monocular test work? Hood DC; Zhang X; Winn BJ J Glaucoma; 2003 Feb; 12(1):3-15. PubMed ID: 12567104 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Repeat reliability of the multifocal visual evoked potential in normal and glaucomatous eyes. Chen CS; Hood DC; Zhang X; Karam EZ; Liebmann JM; Ritch R; Thienprasiddhi P; Greenstein VC J Glaucoma; 2003 Oct; 12(5):399-408. PubMed ID: 14520148 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Effect of recording duration on the diagnostic performance of multifocal visual-evoked potentials in high-risk ocular hypertension and early glaucoma. Fortune B; Zhang X; Hood DC; Demirel S; Patterson E; Jamil A; Mansberger SL; Cioffi GA; Johnson CA J Glaucoma; 2008; 17(3):175-82. PubMed ID: 18414101 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Evaluation of hemifield sector analysis protocol in multifocal visual evoked potential objective perimetry for the diagnosis and early detection of glaucomatous field defects. Mousa MF; Cubbidge RP; Al-Mansouri F; Bener A Korean J Ophthalmol; 2014 Feb; 28(1):49-65. PubMed ID: 24511212 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Structure and function evaluation (SAFE): I. criteria for glaucomatous visual field loss using standard automated perimetry (SAP) and short wavelength automated perimetry (SWAP). Johnson CA; Sample PA; Cioffi GA; Liebmann JR; Weinreb RN Am J Ophthalmol; 2002 Aug; 134(2):177-85. PubMed ID: 12140023 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Test-retest variability of multifocal visual evoked potential and SITA standard perimetry in glaucoma. Bjerre A; Grigg JR; Parry NR; Henson DB Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2004 Nov; 45(11):4035-40. PubMed ID: 15505053 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Threshold and variability properties of matrix frequency-doubling technology and standard automated perimetry in glaucoma. Artes PH; Hutchison DM; Nicolela MT; LeBlanc RP; Chauhan BC Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2005 Jul; 46(7):2451-7. PubMed ID: 15980235 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Visual field defects and multifocal visual evoked potentials: evidence of a linear relationship. Hood DC; Greenstein VC; Odel JG; Zhang X; Ritch R; Liebmann JM; Hong JE; Chen CS; Thienprasiddhi P Arch Ophthalmol; 2002 Dec; 120(12):1672-81. PubMed ID: 12470141 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Clinical use of multifocal visual-evoked potentials in a glaucoma practice: a prospective study. De Moraes CG; Liebmann JM; Ritch R; Hood DC Doc Ophthalmol; 2012 Aug; 125(1):1-9. PubMed ID: 22476612 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Multifocal visual evoked potential and automated perimetry abnormalities in strabismic amblyopes. Greenstein VC; Eggers HM; Hood DC J AAPOS; 2008 Feb; 12(1):11-7. PubMed ID: 17651996 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Diagnostic sensitivity of fast blue-yellow and standard automated perimetry in early glaucoma: a comparison between different test programs. Bengtsson B; Heijl A Ophthalmology; 2006 Jul; 113(7):1092-7. PubMed ID: 16815399 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]