These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
97 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16633301)
1. Assessment of patient satisfaction with endoscopy using an interactive voice response system. Altman C; Birraux T; Lapuelle J; Letard JC; Tusseau F; Canard JM Gastroenterol Clin Biol; 2006 Mar; 30(3):371-6. PubMed ID: 16633301 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Improving endoscopy completion: effectiveness of an interactive voice response system. Griffin JM; Hulbert EM; Vernon SW; Nelson D; Hagel EM; Nugent S; Baines Simon A; Bangerter A; van Ryn M Am J Manag Care; 2011 Mar; 17(3):199-208. PubMed ID: 21504256 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Feasibility of an interactive voice response tool for adolescent assault victims. Blackstone MM; Wiebe DJ; Mollen CJ; Kalra A; Fein JA Acad Emerg Med; 2009 Oct; 16(10):956-62. PubMed ID: 19799571 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Does mobile phone survey method matter? Reliability of computer-assisted telephone interviews and interactive voice response non-communicable diseases risk factor surveys in low and middle income countries. Pariyo GW; Greenleaf AR; Gibson DG; Ali J; Selig H; Labrique AB; Al Kibria GM; Khan IA; Masanja H; Flora MS; Ahmed S; Hyder AA PLoS One; 2019; 14(4):e0214450. PubMed ID: 30969975 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Reasons for non-adherence to cardiometabolic medications, and acceptability of an interactive voice response intervention in patients with hypertension and type 2 diabetes in primary care: a qualitative study. Kassavou A; Sutton S BMJ Open; 2017 Aug; 7(8):e015597. PubMed ID: 28801402 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of an interactive voice response system and smartphone application in the identification of gout flares. Elmagboul N; Coburn BW; Foster J; Mudano A; Melnick J; Bergman D; Yang S; Redden D; Chen L; Filby C; Curtis JR; Mikuls TR; Saag KG Arthritis Res Ther; 2019 Jun; 21(1):160. PubMed ID: 31255174 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. An interactive voice response (IVR) system for adolescents with alcohol use disorders: a pilot study. Kaminer Y; Litt MD; Burke RH; Burleson JA Am J Addict; 2006; 15 Suppl 1():122-5. PubMed ID: 17182427 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The Development of an Interactive Voice Response Survey for Noncommunicable Disease Risk Factor Estimation: Technical Assessment and Cognitive Testing. Gibson DG; Farrenkopf BA; Pereira A; Labrique AB; Pariyo GW J Med Internet Res; 2017 May; 19(5):e112. PubMed ID: 28476724 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A scoping review to explore the suitability of interactive voice response to conduct automated performance measurement of the patient's experience in primary care. Falconi M; Johnston S; Hogg W Prim Health Care Res Dev; 2016 May; 17(3):209-25. PubMed ID: 26242171 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Satisfaction With an Interactive Voice Response System and Symptom Management Toolkit Intervention to Improve Adherence in Patients Prescribed an Oral Anticancer Agent. Marshall VK; Given BA Oncol Nurs Forum; 2020 Nov; 47(6):637-648. PubMed ID: 33063783 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Data equivalency of an interactive voice response system for home assessment of back pain and function. Shaw WS; Verma SK Pain Res Manag; 2007; 12(1):23-30. PubMed ID: 17372631 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of interactive voice response and written self-administered patient surveys for clinical research. Agel J; Rockwood T; Mundt JC; Greist JH; Swiontkowski M Orthopedics; 2001 Dec; 24(12):1155-7. PubMed ID: 11770093 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Prospective long-term assessment of sedation-related adverse events and patient satisfaction for upper endoscopy and colonoscopy. Kilgert B; Rybizki L; Grottke M; Neurath MF; Neumann H Digestion; 2014; 90(1):42-8. PubMed ID: 25139268 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Patient satisfaction with endoscopy measurement and assessment. Yanai H; Schushan-Eisen I; Neuman S; Novis B Dig Dis; 2008; 26(1):75-9. PubMed ID: 18600020 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Effect of general anesthesia during GI endoscopic procedures on patient satisfaction. Iravani S; Frootan M; Zojaji H; Azizi M; Saeedi S; Hashemi MR; Azimzadeh P Gastroenterol Hepatol Bed Bench; 2012; 5(Suppl 1):S20-5. PubMed ID: 24834233 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Pain Assessment with Short Message Service and Interactive Voice Response in Outpatients with Cancer and Pain: A Feasibility Study. Besse KT; Faber-te Boveldt ND; Janssen GH; Vernooij-Dassen M; Vissers KC; Engels Y Pain Pract; 2016 Mar; 16(3):320-6. PubMed ID: 25581306 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of interactive voice response (IVR) with paper administration of instruments to assess functional status, sexual function, and quality of life in elderly men. Rosen RC; Stephens-Shields AJ; Cunningham GR; Cifelli D; Cella D; Farrar JT; Barrett-Connor E; Lewis CE; Pahor M; Hou X; Snyder PJ Qual Life Res; 2016 Apr; 25(4):811-21. PubMed ID: 26358063 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Automating standard alcohol use assessment instruments via interactive voice response technology. Mundt JC; Bohn MJ; King M; Hartley MT Alcohol Clin Exp Res; 2002 Feb; 26(2):207-11. PubMed ID: 11964559 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Using prize-based incentives to enhance daily interactive voice response (IVR) compliance: a feasibility study. Lindsay JA; Minard CG; Hudson S; Green CE; Schmitz JM J Subst Abuse Treat; 2014 Jan; 46(1):74-7. PubMed ID: 24029622 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Prospective comparison of endoscopy patient satisfaction surveys: e-mail versus standard mail versus telephone. Harewood GC; Yacavone RF; Locke GR; Wiersema MJ Am J Gastroenterol; 2001 Dec; 96(12):3312-7. PubMed ID: 11774942 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]