These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
24. [New guidelines to evaluate the response to treatment in solid tumors]. Duffaud F; Therasse P Bull Cancer; 2000 Dec; 87(12):881-6. PubMed ID: 11174117 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Endpoints for assessing drug activity in clinical trials. Pazdur R Oncologist; 2008; 13 Suppl 2():19-21. PubMed ID: 18434634 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Critical evaluation of disease stabilization as a measure of activity of systemic therapy: lessons from trials with arms in which patients do not receive active treatment. Le Tourneau C; Paoletti X; Coquan E; Sablin MP; Zoubir M; Tannock IF J Clin Oncol; 2014 Jan; 32(3):260-3. PubMed ID: 24297942 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. Clinical trials in drug development: a minimalistic approach. Verweij J Curr Opin Oncol; 2012 May; 24(3):332-7. PubMed ID: 22343389 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Stable disease is a valid end point in clinical trials. Tolcher AW Cancer J; 2009; 15(5):374-8. PubMed ID: 19826356 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Design of Phase II cancer trials for evaluation of cytostatic/cytotoxic agents. Kocherginsky M; Cohen EE; Karrison T J Biopharm Stat; 2009; 19(3):524-9. PubMed ID: 19384693 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. A call for change in anticancer drug evaluation. Cvitkovic E Eur J Cancer; 1997 Jan; 33 Suppl 2():S3-7. PubMed ID: 9166088 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Radiological monitoring of the treatment of solid tumors in practice. Ganten MK; Ganten TM; Schlemmer HP Rofo; 2014 May; 186(5):466-73. PubMed ID: 24563412 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Review of phase II trial designs used in studies of molecular targeted agents: outcomes and predictors of success in phase III. El-Maraghi RH; Eisenhauer EA J Clin Oncol; 2008 Mar; 26(8):1346-54. PubMed ID: 18285606 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Tumour growth rates and RECIST criteria in early drug development. Gomez-Roca C; Koscielny S; Ribrag V; Dromain C; Marzouk I; Bidault F; Bahleda R; Ferté C; Massard C; Soria JC Eur J Cancer; 2011 Nov; 47(17):2512-6. PubMed ID: 21763126 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Newer phase II trial designs gaining ground. Benowitz S J Natl Cancer Inst; 2007 Oct; 99(19):1428-9. PubMed ID: 17895467 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. Molecularly targeted therapy based on tumour molecular profiling versus conventional therapy for advanced cancer (SHIVA): a multicentre, open-label, proof-of-concept, randomised, controlled phase 2 trial. Le Tourneau C; Delord JP; Gonçalves A; Gavoille C; Dubot C; Isambert N; Campone M; Trédan O; Massiani MA; Mauborgne C; Armanet S; Servant N; Bièche I; Bernard V; Gentien D; Jezequel P; Attignon V; Boyault S; Vincent-Salomon A; Servois V; Sablin MP; Kamal M; Paoletti X; Lancet Oncol; 2015 Oct; 16(13):1324-34. PubMed ID: 26342236 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Improving the evaluation of new cancer treatments: challenges and opportunities. Rothenberg ML; Carbone DP; Johnson DH Nat Rev Cancer; 2003 Apr; 3(4):303-9. PubMed ID: 12671669 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]