These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

256 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16633402)

  • 21. High performance and acceptability of self-collected rectal swabs for diagnosis of Chlamydia trachomatis and Neisseria gonorrhoeae in men who have sex with men and women.
    van der Helm JJ; Hoebe CJ; van Rooijen MS; Brouwers EE; Fennema HS; Thiesbrummel HF; Dukers-Muijrers NH
    Sex Transm Dis; 2009 Aug; 36(8):493-7. PubMed ID: 19617869
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Is screening for pharyngeal Chlamydia trachomatis warranted in high-risk groups?
    Tipple C; Hill SC; Smith A
    Int J STD AIDS; 2010 Nov; 21(11):770-1. PubMed ID: 21187360
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. [Detection of Chlamydia infection of an Internet-based commercial product].
    Reinton N; Ødegaard OR; Helgheim A; Moghaddam A
    Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 2007 Aug; 127(16):2080-2. PubMed ID: 17717570
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Diagnostic methodologies for chlamydia screening in females aged 15 to 25 years from private insurance claims data in the United States, 2001 to 2005.
    Owusu-Edusei K; Bohm MK; Kent CK
    Sex Transm Dis; 2009 Jul; 36(7):419-21. PubMed ID: 19556935
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. A new role for Chlamydia trachomatis serology?
    Johnson AM; Horner P
    Sex Transm Infect; 2008 Apr; 84(2):79-80. PubMed ID: 18256104
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. The use and performance of oral-throat rinses to detect pharyngeal Neisseria gonorrhoeae and Chlamydia trachomatis infections.
    Papp JR; Ahrens K; Phillips C; Kent CK; Philip S; Klausner JD
    Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis; 2007 Nov; 59(3):259-64. PubMed ID: 17662554
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Genital Chlamydia trachomatis infections.
    Bébéar C; de Barbeyrac B
    Clin Microbiol Infect; 2009 Jan; 15(1):4-10. PubMed ID: 19220334
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Is there a role for leucocyte esterase testing in non-invasive screening using nucleic acid amplification tests of asymptomatic men?
    Horner PJ; Taylor-Robinson D
    Int J STD AIDS; 2007 Feb; 18(2):73-4. PubMed ID: 17331273
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. [Chlamydia trachomatis infections--a time for action?].
    Mylonas I; Kirschner W; Weissenbacher T; Gingelmaier A; Weissenbacher ER; Friese K
    Dtsch Med Wochenschr; 2007 May; 132(21):1170-6. PubMed ID: 17506013
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Should Asymptomatic Men Who Have Sex With Men Be Screened for Oropharyngeal Chlamydia? Clinical Outcomes From a Cross-Sectional Study.
    Ong JJ; Chow EPF; De Petra V; Williamson D; Pelatosis I; Howden B; Zhang L; Chen MY; Bradshaw CS; Hocking J; Fairley CK
    Sex Transm Dis; 2018 Feb; 45(2):103-106. PubMed ID: 29329179
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Chlamydia--the problem that just won't go away.
    Coughlan E; Bagshaw S
    N Z Med J; 2005 Aug; 118(1220):U1605. PubMed ID: 16132067
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Commentary: Chlamydia trachomatis screening: what are we trying to do?
    Peterman TA; Gottlieb SL; Berman SM
    Int J Epidemiol; 2009 Apr; 38(2):449-51. PubMed ID: 19174542
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Chlamydia prevalence among college students: reproductive and public health implications.
    James AB; Simpson TY; Chamberlain WA
    Sex Transm Dis; 2008 Jun; 35(6):529-32. PubMed ID: 18354340
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. The program cost and cost-effectiveness of screening men for Chlamydia to prevent pelvic inflammatory disease in women.
    Gift TL; Gaydos CA; Kent CK; Marrazzo JM; Rietmeijer CA; Schillinger JA; Dunne EF
    Sex Transm Dis; 2008 Nov; 35(11 Suppl):S66-75. PubMed ID: 18830137
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. [The rate of detecting Chlamydia in male homosexuals with syphilis].
    Borisenko KK; Delektorskiĭ VV; Shakirov MT; Kubanova AA; Tishchenko EL; Toporovskiĭ LM
    Vestn Dermatol Venerol; 1990; (6):52-4. PubMed ID: 2220064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Chlamydia trachomatis: discovery of a new strain.
    Barnes J; Merien F
    N Z Med J; 2007 Apr; 120(1252):U2502. PubMed ID: 17460749
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Mailed urine samples are not an effective screening approach for Chlamydia trachomatis case finding among young men.
    Domeika M; Oscarsson L; Hallén A; Hjelm E; Sylvan S
    J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol; 2007 Jul; 21(6):789-94. PubMed ID: 17567309
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Chlamydial infection in homosexual men. Frequency of isolation of Chlamydia trachomatis from the urethra, ano-rectum, and pharynx.
    McMillan A; Sommerville RG; McKie PM
    Br J Vener Dis; 1981 Feb; 57(1):47-9. PubMed ID: 7470835
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Sports preparticipation examination to screen college athletes for Chlamydia trachomatis.
    Hennrikus E; Oberto D; Linder JM; Rempel JM; Hennrikus N
    Med Sci Sports Exerc; 2010 Apr; 42(4):683-8. PubMed ID: 21099757
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Improving Chlamydia trachomatis retesting rates by mailed self-collection kit.
    Buhrer-Skinner M; Muller R; Buettner PG; Gordon R; Debattista J
    Sex Health; 2011 Jun; 8(2):248-50. PubMed ID: 21592441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.