600 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16634167)
1. Evaluating the oversight of scientific misconduct.
Redman BK; Merz JF
Account Res; 2005; 12(3):157-62. PubMed ID: 16634167
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Assessing the seriousness of research misconduct: considerations for sanction assignment.
Keranen L
Account Res; 2006; 13(2):179-205. PubMed ID: 16830407
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. From Baltimore to Bell Labs: reflections on two decades of debate about scientific misconduct.
Resnik DB
Account Res; 2003; 10(2):123-35. PubMed ID: 14577424
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Definitions and boundaries of research misconduct: perspectives from a federal government viewpoint.
Price AR
J Higher Educ; 1994; 65(3):286-97. PubMed ID: 11653365
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Policing fraud and deceit: the legal aspects of misconduct in scientific inquiry.
Protti M
J Infor Ethics; 1996; 5(1):59-71. PubMed ID: 11653390
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Federal actions against plagiarism in research.
Price AR
J Infor Ethics; 1996; 5(1):34-51. PubMed ID: 11653389
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. The federal research misconduct regulations as viewed from the research universities.
Wright DE
Centen Rev; 1994; 38(2):249-72. PubMed ID: 11656759
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. The role of federal regulations in assuring research integrity.
Friedman PJ
Account Res; 1993; 3(2-3):111-6. PubMed ID: 11652290
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Ensuring scientific integrity in research: aspects of fairness and justice.
Green HP
Account Res; 1993; 3(2-3):209-13. PubMed ID: 11652295
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Scientific misconduct in academia: a survey and analysis of applicable law.
Sise CB
San Diego Law Rev; 1991; 28(2):401-28. PubMed ID: 11651628
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Criminal liability for misconduct in scientific research.
Kuzma SM
Univ Mich J Law Reform; 1992; 25(2):357-421. PubMed ID: 11651584
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Teaching scientific integrity.
Gifford F
Centen Rev; 1994; 38(2):297-314. PubMed ID: 11656760
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Misconduct and social control in science: issues, problems, solutions.
Fox MF; Braxton JM
J Higher Educ; 1994; 65(3):373-83. PubMed ID: 11653368
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. NIH office plans research on misconduct.
Dalton R
Nature; 1999 Jul; 400(6740):99. PubMed ID: 10408427
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. A call for the development of "Good Research Practices" (GRP) guidelines.
Glick JL; Shamoo AE
Account Res; 1993; 2(4):231-5. PubMed ID: 11652143
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Scientific misconduct: the lessons of time. Commentary on "The history and future of the Office of Research Integrity: scientific misconduct and beyond" (C. Pascal).
Chubin DE
Sci Eng Ethics; 1999 Apr; 5(2):199-202. PubMed ID: 11657857
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Baltimore case--in brief.
Hamilton DP
Science; 1991 Jul; 253(5015):24-5. PubMed ID: 1648263
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. The politics of research misconduct: congressional oversight, universities, and science.
LaFollette MC
J Higher Educ; 1994; 65(3):261-85. PubMed ID: 11653364
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Responsibilities of awardee and applicant institutions for dealing with and reporting possible misconduct in science; final rule.
US Public Health Service
Fed Regist; 1989 Aug; 54(151):32446-51. PubMed ID: 11651184
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. The demise of the social contract for science: misconduct in science and the nonmodern world.
Guston DH
Centen Rev; 1994; 38(2):215-48. PubMed ID: 11656758
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
