140 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16634174)
1. Evaluating research misconduct policies at major research universities: a pilot study.
Lind RA
Account Res; 2005; 12(3):241-62. PubMed ID: 16634174
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Encouraging accountability in research: a pilot assessment of training efforts.
Mastroianni AC; Kahn JP
Account Res; 1999; 7(1):85-100. PubMed ID: 11657564
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Research universities and scientific misconduct -- history, policies, and the future.
Steneck NH
J Higher Educ; 1994; 65(3):310-30. PubMed ID: 11653367
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Misconduct and social control in science: issues, problems, solutions.
Fox MF; Braxton JM
J Higher Educ; 1994; 65(3):373-83. PubMed ID: 11653368
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. A national survey of policies on disclosure of conflicts of interest in biomedical research.
McCrary SV; Anderson CB; Jakovljevic J; Khan T; McCullough LB; Wray NP; Brody BA
N Engl J Med; 2000 Nov; 343(22):1621-6. PubMed ID: 11096171
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Research fraud, misconduct, and the IRB.
Hilgartner S
IRB; 1990; 12(1):1-4. PubMed ID: 11651971
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. U.S. research universities' institutional conflict of interest policies.
Slaughter S; Feldman MP; Thomas SL
J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics; 2009 Sep; 4(3):3-20. PubMed ID: 19754230
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Public Health Service policies on research misconduct. Final rule.
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS)
Fed Regist; 2005 May; 70(94):28369-400. PubMed ID: 15898182
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Scientific judgment and the limits of conflict-of-interest policies.
Elliott KC
Account Res; 2008; 15(1):1-29. PubMed ID: 18298027
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. When researchers accept funding from the tobacco industry, do ethics go up in smoke?
Wolinsky H
N Y State J Med; 1985 Jul; 85(7):451-4. PubMed ID: 11643879
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Institutional policies for responding to allegations of research fraud.
Greene PJ; Durch JS; Horwitz W; Hooper VS
IRB; 1986; 8(4):1-7. PubMed ID: 11653742
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Academics face abuse of rules designed to protect research.
Cowen RC
Christ Sci Monitor; 1998 Mar; ():13. PubMed ID: 11647561
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Deception in scientific research.
Woolf PK
Jurimetrics; 1988; 29(1):67-95. PubMed ID: 11654908
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Assessing the seriousness of research misconduct: considerations for sanction assignment.
Keranen L
Account Res; 2006; 13(2):179-205. PubMed ID: 16830407
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The politics of research misconduct: congressional oversight, universities, and science.
LaFollette MC
J Higher Educ; 1994; 65(3):261-85. PubMed ID: 11653364
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. RESEARCH MISCONDUCT POLICIES AT HIGHER EDUCATION INSTITUTIONS IN PUERTO RICO.
Portela ALM; Santaella CLC; Rivera IB
Med Law; 2015 Sep; 34(1):449-469. PubMed ID: 30759945
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Conflicts of interest in academic research: policies, processes, and attitudes.
Lipton S; Boyd EA; Bero LA
Account Res; 2004; 11(2):83-102. PubMed ID: 15675050
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. From Baltimore to Bell Labs: reflections on two decades of debate about scientific misconduct.
Resnik DB
Account Res; 2003; 10(2):123-35. PubMed ID: 14577424
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Evaluating the oversight of scientific misconduct.
Redman BK; Merz JF
Account Res; 2005; 12(3):157-62. PubMed ID: 16634167
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Regulating academic-industrial research relationships--solving problems or stifling progress?
Stossel TP
N Engl J Med; 2005 Sep; 353(10):1060-5. PubMed ID: 16148294
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
