BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

179 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16634498)

  • 1. The importance of implant surface characteristics in the replacement of failed implants.
    Alsaadi G; Quirynen M; van Steenberghe D
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2006; 21(2):270-4. PubMed ID: 16634498
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Rehabilitation of edentulous mandibles by means of five TiUnite implants after one-stage surgery: a 1-year retrospective study of 90 patients.
    Friberg B; Jemt T
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2008 Mar; 10(1):47-54. PubMed ID: 18254740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Clinical evaluation of dental implants with surfaces roughened by anodic oxidation, dual acid-etched implants, and machined implants.
    Aalam AA; Nowzari H
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2005; 20(5):793-8. PubMed ID: 16274156
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Analysis of 164 titanium oxide-surface implants in completely edentulous arches for fixed prosthesis anchorage using the pterygomaxillary region.
    Balshi SF; Wolfinger GJ; Balshi TJ
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2005; 20(6):946-52. PubMed ID: 16392353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Predisposing conditions for retrograde peri-implantitis, and treatment suggestions.
    Quirynen M; Vogels R; Alsaadi G; Naert I; Jacobs R; van Steenberghe D
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2005 Oct; 16(5):599-608. PubMed ID: 16164468
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparative histomorphometry and resonance frequency analysis of implants with moderately rough surfaces in a loaded animal model.
    Al-Nawas B; Groetz KA; Goetz H; Duschner H; Wagner W
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2008 Jan; 19(1):1-8. PubMed ID: 17944964
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Turned, machined versus double-etched dental implants in vivo.
    Al-Nawas B; Hangen U; Duschner H; Krummenauer F; Wagner W
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2007 Jun; 9(2):71-8. PubMed ID: 17535330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A long-term retrospective study of two different implant surfaces placed after reconstruction of the severely resorbed maxilla using Le Fort I osteotomy and interpositional bone grafting.
    Marchetti C; Pieri F; Corinaldesi G; Degidi M
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2008; 23(5):911-8. PubMed ID: 19014162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Resonance frequency measurements in vivo and related surface properties of magnesium-incorporated, micropatterned and magnesium-incorporated TiUnite, Osseotite, SLA and TiOblast implants.
    Sul YT; Jönsson J; Yoon GS; Johansson C
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2009 Oct; 20(10):1146-55. PubMed ID: 19719742
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Outcomes of placing short dental implants in the posterior mandible: a retrospective study of 124 cases.
    Grant BT; Pancko FX; Kraut RA
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2009 Apr; 67(4):713-7. PubMed ID: 19304026
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A retrospective analysis of 44 implants with no rotational primary stability used for fixed prosthesis anchorage.
    Balshi SF; Wolfinger GJ; Balshi TJ
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2007; 22(3):467-71. PubMed ID: 17622014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Immediate loading of Brånemark System Implants: a comparison between TiUnite and turned implants placed in the anterior mandible.
    Fröberg KK; Lindh C; Ericsson I
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2006; 8(4):187-97. PubMed ID: 17100744
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Secondary stability assessment of titanium implants with an alkali-etched surface: a resonance frequency analysis study in beagle dogs.
    Strnad J; Urban K; Povysil C; Strnad Z
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2008; 23(3):502-12. PubMed ID: 18700375
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Dental implants placed in previously failed sites: survival rate and factors affecting the outcome.
    Machtei EE; Mahler D; Oettinger-Barak O; Zuabi O; Horwitz J
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2008 Mar; 19(3):259-64. PubMed ID: 18177430
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Histological comparison of bone to implant contact in two types of dental implant surfaces: a single case study.
    Shibli JA; Feres M; de Figueiredo LC; Iezzi G; Piattelli A
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2007 Mar; 8(3):29-36. PubMed ID: 17351679
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Early complete failures of fixed implant-supported prostheses in the edentulous maxilla: a 3-year analysis of 17 consecutive cluster failure patients.
    Jemt T; Häger P
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2006; 8(2):77-86. PubMed ID: 16774593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Success and survival of single dental implants placed in sites of previously failed implants.
    Grossmann Y; Levin L
    J Periodontol; 2007 Sep; 78(9):1670-4. PubMed ID: 17760534
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A retrospective study of 1925 consecutively placed immediate implants from 1988 to 2004.
    Wagenberg B; Froum SJ
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2006; 21(1):71-80. PubMed ID: 16519184
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Five-year clinical results of immediately loaded dental implants using mandibular overdentures.
    Alfadda SA; Attard NJ; David LA
    Int J Prosthodont; 2009; 22(4):368-73. PubMed ID: 19639074
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A comparison of characteristics of implant failure and survival in periodontally compromised and periodontally healthy patients: a clinical report.
    Rosenberg ES; Cho SC; Elian N; Jalbout ZN; Froum S; Evian CI
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2004; 19(6):873-9. PubMed ID: 15623064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.