BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

173 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16635030)

  • 1. Intrinsic measurement bias on computed tomography scout view is unpredictable: Computed tomography pelvimetry using a phantom.
    Anderson NG; Fenwick JL; Wells JE
    Australas Radiol; 2006 Apr; 50(2):127-31. PubMed ID: 16635030
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Measurement error in computed tomography pelvimetry.
    Anderson N; Humphries N; Wells JE
    Australas Radiol; 2005 Apr; 49(2):104-7. PubMed ID: 15845044
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Pelvimetry by digitalized radiography].
    Adam P; Alberge Y; Sablayrolles JL; Grandjean B
    J Radiol; 1986 Jan; 67(1):47-52. PubMed ID: 3701674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Pelvimetry using computerized tomography. I. Theoretical and methodical fundamentals].
    Herrmann K; Ketscher KD; Siering U; Retzke U; Schmidt M
    Zentralbl Gynakol; 1990; 112(19):1209-15. PubMed ID: 2267874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Computed tomographic pelvimetry in German shepherd dogs.
    Ocal MK; Dabanoglu I; Kara ME; Turan E
    Dtsch Tierarztl Wochenschr; 2003 Jan; 110(1):17-20. PubMed ID: 12596666
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Computed tomographic pelvimetry.
    Lenke RR; Shuman WP
    J Reprod Med; 1986 Oct; 31(10):958-60. PubMed ID: 3783538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Accuracy analysis of computer tomography imaging for medical modeling purposes on the example of Siemens Sensation 10 scanner].
    Miechowicz S; Urbanik A; Chrzan R; Grochowska A
    Przegl Lek; 2010; 67(4):295-9. PubMed ID: 20687363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Low dose helical CT pelvimetry: evaluation of radiation dose and image processing].
    Garnier S; Bertrand P; Chapiron C; Asquier E; Rouleau P; Brunereau L
    J Radiol; 2004 Jun; 85(6 Pt 1):747-53. PubMed ID: 15243375
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Quantitative assessment of the influence of location, internal temperature, idle time, and normalization on the sensitivity of a mobile PET/CT scanner.
    Belakhlef S; Church C; Hays A; Fraser R; Lakhanpal S
    J Nucl Med Technol; 2008 Sep; 36(3):147-50. PubMed ID: 18703620
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Pelvimetry].
    Lode OI; Sundalsfoll S; Austad T
    Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 1991 Aug; 111(18):2261-4. PubMed ID: 1896980
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. CT pelvimetry: the foveae are not an accurate landmark for the level of the ischial spines.
    Aronson D; Kier R
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1991 Mar; 156(3):527-30. PubMed ID: 1899750
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Improvement in CT pelvimetry.
    Wiesen EJ; Crass JR; Bellon EM; Ashmead GG; Cohen AM
    Radiology; 1991 Jan; 178(1):259-62. PubMed ID: 1984315
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Intraobserver and interobserver agreement, reproducibility, and accuracy of computed tomographic measurements of pituitary gland dimensions in healthy dogs.
    van der Vlugt-Meijer RH; Meij BP; Voorhout G
    Am J Vet Res; 2006 Oct; 67(10):1750-5. PubMed ID: 17014327
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Sensitivity and daily quality control of a mobile PET/CT scanner operating in 3-dimensional mode.
    Belakhlef A; Church C; Fraser R; Lakhanpal S
    J Nucl Med Technol; 2007 Dec; 35(4):229-31. PubMed ID: 18006593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Pelvimetry using x-ray computed tomography].
    Camus M; Buthiau D; Vauthier D; Heitz F; Darbois Y
    J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris); 1987; 16(3):327-33. PubMed ID: 3598097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Pelvimetry with compute tomography].
    Martinsen AC; Risdal M; Bay T; Drolsum A
    Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 2005 Aug; 125(15):2023-5. PubMed ID: 16100544
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. An evaluation of the EOS X-ray imaging system in pelvimetry.
    Sigmann MH; Delabrousse E; Riethmuller D; Runge M; Peyron C; Aubry S
    Diagn Interv Imaging; 2014 Sep; 95(9):833-8. PubMed ID: 24906809
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Assessing polyp size by improved digitalized computed tomography (CT).
    Suzuki C; Matsson L; Rubio CA
    Anticancer Res; 2008; 28(3B):1911-5. PubMed ID: 18630480
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Helical multidetector row quantitative computed tomography (QCT) precision.
    Bligh M; Bidaut L; White RA; Murphy WA; Stevens DM; Cody DD
    Acad Radiol; 2009 Feb; 16(2):150-9. PubMed ID: 19124100
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. PET performance measurements for an LSO-based combined PET/CT scanner using the National Electrical Manufacturers Association NU 2-2001 standard.
    Erdi YE; Nehmeh SA; Mulnix T; Humm JL; Watson CC
    J Nucl Med; 2004 May; 45(5):813-21. PubMed ID: 15136631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.