These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

174 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16635030)

  • 21. [Obstetric pelvimetry using digital radiography (CT topogram)].
    Reisner K; Fettig O; Bartscher KH; Knappschneider U
    Rofo; 1985 May; 142(5):566-9. PubMed ID: 2988045
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Improving the accuracy of digital CT pelvimetry.
    Smith RC; McCarthy S
    J Comput Assist Tomogr; 1991; 15(5):787-9. PubMed ID: 1885796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. [Comparison of classic and digital pelvimetry for measuring the medial transverse diameter in 50 female patients].
    Montoy JC; Ravaux S; Blache G
    J Radiol; 1990 Nov; 71(11):633-8. PubMed ID: 2283626
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Quantitative assessment of the physical potential of proton beam range verification with PET/CT.
    Knopf A; Parodi K; Paganetti H; Cascio E; Bonab A; Bortfeld T
    Phys Med Biol; 2008 Aug; 53(15):4137-51. PubMed ID: 18635897
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Determination of the weighted CT dose index in modern multi-detector CT scanners.
    Perisinakis K; Damilakis J; Tzedakis A; Papadakis A; Theocharopoulos N; Gourtsoyiannis N
    Phys Med Biol; 2007 Nov; 52(21):6485-95. PubMed ID: 17951857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Comparison of low-dose CT and MR for measurement of intra-abdominal adipose tissue: a phantom and human study.
    Yoon DY; Moon JH; Kim HK; Choi CS; Chang SK; Yun EJ; Seo YL
    Acad Radiol; 2008 Jan; 15(1):62-70. PubMed ID: 18078908
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Comparison of three generations of electron beam tomography on image noise and reproducibility, a phantom study.
    Chau A; Gopal A; Mao S; Tseng PH; Fischer H; Budoff MJ
    Invest Radiol; 2006 Jun; 41(6):522-6. PubMed ID: 16763471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Phantom investigations on CT seed imaging for interstitial brachytherapy.
    Siebert FA; De Brabandere M; Kirisits C; Kovács G; Venselaar J
    Radiother Oncol; 2007 Nov; 85(2):316-23. PubMed ID: 17884213
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. A comparative study of X-ray pelvimetry and CT pelvimetry.
    Raman S; Samuel D; Suresh K
    Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 1991 Aug; 31(3):217-20. PubMed ID: 1804081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Single-photon emission computed tomography/computed tomography: basic instrumentation and innovations.
    O'Connor MK; Kemp BJ
    Semin Nucl Med; 2006 Oct; 36(4):258-66. PubMed ID: 16950143
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Can three-dimensional pelvimetry using low-dose stereoradiography replace low-dose CT pelvimetry?
    Aubry S; Padoin P; Petegnief Y; Vidal C; Riethmuller D; Delabrousse E
    Diagn Interv Imaging; 2018 Sep; 99(9):569-576. PubMed ID: 29567122
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Intensity distribution and impact of scatter for dual-source CT.
    Kyriakou Y; Kalender WA
    Phys Med Biol; 2007 Dec; 52(23):6969-89. PubMed ID: 18029988
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. [Dosimetry comparison of pelvimetry methods using conventional radiologic technic and x-ray scanner].
    Germond M; Raimondi S; Schnyder P; de Grandi P
    J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris); 1989; 18(8):1002-6. PubMed ID: 2621327
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Positioning accuracy in a registration-free CT-based navigation system.
    Brandenberger D; Birkfellner W; Baumann B; Messmer P; Huegli RW; Regazzoni P; Jacob AL
    Phys Med Biol; 2007 Dec; 52(23):7073-86. PubMed ID: 18029994
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Flat panel detector-based volumetric computed tomography (fpVCT): performance evaluation of volumetric methods by using different phantoms in comparison to 64-multislice computed tomography.
    Obenauer S; Dullin C; Heuser M
    Invest Radiol; 2007 May; 42(5):291-6. PubMed ID: 17414524
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Concepts for dose determination in flat-detector CT.
    Kyriakou Y; Deak P; Langner O; Kalender WA
    Phys Med Biol; 2008 Jul; 53(13):3551-66. PubMed ID: 18552416
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. How reproducible are classical and new CT-pelvimetry measurements?
    Capelle C; Devos P; Caudrelier C; Verpillat P; Fourquet T; Puech P; Garabedian C; Lemaitre L
    Diagn Interv Imaging; 2020 Feb; 101(2):79-89. PubMed ID: 31473163
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Multisphere phantom and analysis algorithm for PET image quality assessment.
    Wilson JM; Turkington TG
    Phys Med Biol; 2008 Jun; 53(12):3267-78. PubMed ID: 18506071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. [Helical CT pelvimetry: advantages of a low dose volume acquisition technique].
    Breidt D; Bouquigny F; Clément JP; Menéchal P; Levert M; Quéreux C; Piérot L
    J Radiol; 2003 Sep; 84(9):1027-30. PubMed ID: 13679759
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Experience with computed tomography (CT) pelvimetry in Ibadan, Nigeria: a preliminary report.
    Obajimi MO; Omigbodun AO; Ogunseyinde AO; Adekunle AO
    Afr J Med Med Sci; 2001 Sep; 30(3):237-9. PubMed ID: 14510137
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.