These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
245 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16635918)
41. Direct photographic documentation of ileal mucosa in routine colonoscopy is not an independent valid or reliable proof of completion: quality assurance issues for the national colorectal cancer-screening programme. Baraza W; Brown S; Shorthouse AJ; Tiffin N; Hurlstone DP Colorectal Dis; 2009 Jan; 11(1):89-93. PubMed ID: 18400041 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. A novel colonoscopy reporting system enabling quality assurance. van Doorn SC; van Vliet J; Fockens P; Dekker E Endoscopy; 2014 Mar; 46(3):181-7. PubMed ID: 24500977 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. The impact of endoscopists' experience and learning curves and interendoscopist variation on colonoscopy completion rates. Dafnis G; Granath F; Påhlman L; Hannuksela H; Ekbom A; Blomqvist P Endoscopy; 2001 Jun; 33(6):511-7. PubMed ID: 11437045 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. Quality control of colonoscopy procedures: a prospective validated method for the evaluation of professional practices applicable to all endoscopic units. Coriat R; Pommaret E; Chryssostalis A; Viennot S; Gaudric M; Brezault C; Lamarque D; Roche H; Verdier D; Parlier D; Prat F; Chaussade S Gastroenterol Clin Biol; 2009 Feb; 33(2):103-8. PubMed ID: 18783903 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. Achieving high quality colonoscopy: using graphical representation to measure performance and reset standards. Rajasekhar PT; Rutter MD; Bramble MG; Wilson DW; East JE; Greenaway JR; Saunders BP; Lee TJ; Barton R; Hungin AP; Rees CJ Colorectal Dis; 2012 Dec; 14(12):1538-45. PubMed ID: 22540766 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. Views of supervisors of colonoscopy training on quality issues for the national bowel cancer screening program in Australia. Pentti M; Muller J; Janda M; Newman B J Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2009 Feb; 24(2):209-13. PubMed ID: 18823432 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. What are the sensitivity and specificity of endoscopic photographs in determining completion of colonoscopy? Results from an online questionnaire. Thuraisingam AI; Brown JL; Anderson JT Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2008 Jun; 20(6):567-71. PubMed ID: 18467917 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Use of a double balloon enteroscope facilitates caecal intubation after incomplete colonoscopy with a standard colonoscope. Kaltenbach T; Soetikno R; Friedland S Dig Liver Dis; 2006 Dec; 38(12):921-5. PubMed ID: 16990055 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. [Essential quality criteria in the indication and performance of colonoscopy]. González-Huix Lladó F; Figa Francesch M; Huertas Nadal C Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2010 Jan; 33(1):33-42. PubMed ID: 19631413 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Unsedated colonoscopy: time to revisit this option? Leung FW; Aharonian S; Guth PH; Jackson G; Chu SK; Nguyen BD; Simpson P J Fam Pract; 2008 Dec; 57(12):E1-4. PubMed ID: 19080759 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. The completion rate of colonoscopy in normal daily practice: factors associated with failure. Loffeld RJ; van der Putten AB Digestion; 2009; 80(4):267-70. PubMed ID: 19923819 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Unsedated colonoscopy: patient characteristics and satisfaction in a community-based endoscopy unit. Petrini JL; Egan JV; Hahn WV Gastrointest Endosc; 2009 Mar; 69(3 Pt 1):567-72. PubMed ID: 19231501 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. Development and validation of the patient and clinician sedation satisfaction index for colonoscopy and upper endoscopy. Vargo J; Howard K; Petrillo J; Scott J; Revicki DA Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2009 Feb; 7(2):156-62. PubMed ID: 18930167 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. Assessment of the quality of colonoscopy in Romania. Sporea I; Popescu A; Sirli R; Dănilă M Rom J Gastroenterol; 2005 Sep; 14(3):303-7. PubMed ID: 16200244 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Patient factors predictive of pain and difficulty during sedation-free colonoscopy: a prospective study in Korea. Chung YW; Han DS; Yoo KS; Park CK Dig Liver Dis; 2007 Sep; 39(9):872-6. PubMed ID: 17652041 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. A randomized, controlled comparison of warm water infusion in lieu of air insufflation versus air insufflation for aiding colonoscopy insertion in sedated patients undergoing colorectal cancer screening and surveillance. Leung JW; Mann SK; Siao-Salera R; Ransibrahmanakul K; Lim B; Cabrera H; Canete W; Barredo P; Gutierrez R; Leung FW Gastrointest Endosc; 2009 Sep; 70(3):505-10. PubMed ID: 19555938 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Modifiable factors associated with patient-reported pain during and after screening colonoscopy. Bugajski M; Wieszczy P; Hoff G; Rupinski M; Regula J; Kaminski MF Gut; 2018 Nov; 67(11):1958-1964. PubMed ID: 28970289 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. Effect of institution-wide policy of colonoscopy withdrawal time > or = 7 minutes on polyp detection. Sawhney MS; Cury MS; Neeman N; Ngo LH; Lewis JM; Chuttani R; Pleskow DK; Aronson MD Gastroenterology; 2008 Dec; 135(6):1892-8. PubMed ID: 18835390 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. Colonoscopy: Art or science? Roberts-Thomson IC; Teo E J Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2009 Feb; 24(2):180-4. PubMed ID: 19215330 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]