BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

139 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16636405)

  • 1. Reducing boundary effects in static EIT imaging.
    Kao TJ; Kim BS; Isaacson D; Newell JC; Saulnier GJ
    Physiol Meas; 2006 May; 27(5):S13-23. PubMed ID: 16636405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Imaging cardiac activity by the D-bar method for electrical impedance tomography.
    Isaacson D; Mueller JL; Newell JC; Siltanen S
    Physiol Meas; 2006 May; 27(5):S43-50. PubMed ID: 16636419
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Electrical impedance tomography problem with inaccurately known boundary and contact impedances.
    Kolehmainen V; Lassas M; Ola P
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2008 Oct; 27(10):1404-14. PubMed ID: 18815092
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Imaging of conductivity changes and electrode movement in EIT.
    Soleimani M; Gómez-Laberge C; Adler A
    Physiol Meas; 2006 May; 27(5):S103-13. PubMed ID: 16636402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Induced current magnetic resonance-electrical impedance tomography.
    Ozparlak L; Ider YZ
    Physiol Meas; 2005 Apr; 26(2):S289-305. PubMed ID: 15798242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Static imaging of the electrical impedance tomography on cylinder physical phantom.
    Liu R; Fu F; You F; Shi X; Dong X
    Biomed Mater Eng; 2015; 26 Suppl 1():S1381-8. PubMed ID: 26405899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Objective selection of hyperparameter for EIT.
    Graham BM; Adler A
    Physiol Meas; 2006 May; 27(5):S65-79. PubMed ID: 16636421
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Electrode boundary conditions and experimental validation for BEM-based EIT forward and inverse solutions.
    Babaeizadeh S; Brooks DH; Isaacson D; Newell JC
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2006 Sep; 25(9):1180-8. PubMed ID: 16967803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Spatial resolution improvement of 3D EIT images by the shrinking sLORETA-FOCUSS algorithm.
    Dong G; Liu H; Bayford RH; Yerworth R; Schimpf PH; Yan W
    Physiol Meas; 2005 Apr; 26(2):S199-208. PubMed ID: 15798233
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Factors limiting the application of electrical impedance tomography for identification of regional conductivity changes using scalp electrodes during epileptic seizures in humans.
    Fabrizi L; Sparkes M; Horesh L; Perez-Juste Abascal JF; McEwan A; Bayford RH; Elwes R; Binnie CD; Holder DS
    Physiol Meas; 2006 May; 27(5):S163-74. PubMed ID: 16636408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Phase artefact reduction in magnetic resonance electrical impedance tomography (MREIT).
    Lee BI; Park C; Pyo HC; Kwon O; Woo EJ
    Phys Med Biol; 2006 Oct; 51(20):5277-88. PubMed ID: 17019038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Solution of the inverse problem of magnetic induction tomography (MIT).
    Merwa R; Hollaus K; Brunner P; Scharfetter H
    Physiol Meas; 2005 Apr; 26(2):S241-50. PubMed ID: 15798237
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Estimation of anomaly location and size using electrical impedance tomography.
    Kwon O; Yoon JR; Seo JK; Woo EJ; Cho YG
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2003 Jan; 50(1):89-96. PubMed ID: 12617528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Image reconstruction incorporated with the skull inhomogeneity for electrical impedance tomography.
    Ni A; Dong X; Yang G; Fu F; Tang C
    Comput Med Imaging Graph; 2008 Jul; 32(5):409-15. PubMed ID: 18501557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Image reconstruction of anisotropic conductivity tensor distribution in MREIT: computer simulation study.
    Seo JK; Pyo HC; Park C; Kwon O; Woo EJ
    Phys Med Biol; 2004 Sep; 49(18):4371-82. PubMed ID: 15509071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Imaging pathologic pulmonary air and fluid accumulation by functional and absolute EIT.
    Hahn G; Just A; Dudykevych T; Frerichs I; Hinz J; Quintel M; Hellige G
    Physiol Meas; 2006 May; 27(5):S187-98. PubMed ID: 16636410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. High field MREIT: setup and tissue phantom imaging at 11 T.
    Sadleir R; Grant S; Zhang SU; Oh SH; Lee BI; Woo EJ
    Physiol Meas; 2006 May; 27(5):S261-70. PubMed ID: 16636417
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Dynamic electrical impedance imaging with the interacting multiple model scheme.
    Kim KY; Kim BS; Kim MC; Kim S; Isaacson D; Newell JC
    Physiol Meas; 2005 Apr; 26(2):S217-33. PubMed ID: 15798235
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Electrical impedance tomography system: an open access circuit design.
    Soleimani M
    Biomed Eng Online; 2006 May; 5():28. PubMed ID: 16672061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Improving the forward solver for the complete electrode model in EIT using algebraic multigrid.
    Soleimani M; Powell CE; Polydorides N
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2005 May; 24(5):577-83. PubMed ID: 15889545
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.