158 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16636405)
21. Comparison of applied and induced current electrical impedance tomography.
Tanguay LF; Gagnon H; Guardo R
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2007 Sep; 54(9):1643-9. PubMed ID: 17867356
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Direct reconstruction of tissue parameters from differential multifrequency EIT in vivo.
Mayer M; Brunner P; Merwa R; Smolle-Jüttner FM; Maier A; Scharfetter H
Physiol Meas; 2006 May; 27(5):S93-101. PubMed ID: 16636423
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Using the GRID to improve the computation speed of electrical impedance tomography (EIT) reconstruction algorithms.
Fritschy J; Horesh L; Holder DS; Bayford RH
Physiol Meas; 2005 Apr; 26(2):S209-15. PubMed ID: 15798234
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Magnetic resonance driven electrical impedance tomography: a simulation study.
Negishi M; Tong T; Constable RT
IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2011 Mar; 30(3):828-37. PubMed ID: 21147595
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Electrical impedance tomography for piecewise constant domains using boundary element shape-based inverse solutions.
Babaeizadeh S; Brooks DH
IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2007 May; 26(5):637-47. PubMed ID: 17518058
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Experimental results for 2D magnetic resonance electrical impedance tomography (MR-EIT) using magnetic flux density in one direction.
Birgül O; Eyüboğlu BM; Ider YZ
Phys Med Biol; 2003 Nov; 48(21):3485-504. PubMed ID: 14653558
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Efficient Simultaneous Reconstruction of Time-Varying Images and Electrode Contact Impedances in Electrical Impedance Tomography.
Boverman G; Isaacson D; Newell JC; Saulnier GJ; Kao TJ; Amm BC; Wang X; Davenport DM; Chong DH; Sahni R; Ashe JM
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2017 Apr; 64(4):795-806. PubMed ID: 27295649
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Generating accurate finite element meshes for the forward model of the human head in EIT.
Tizzard A; Horesh L; Yerworth RJ; Holder DS; Bayford RH
Physiol Meas; 2005 Apr; 26(2):S251-61. PubMed ID: 15798238
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Uses and abuses of EIDORS: an extensible software base for EIT.
Adler A; Lionheart WR
Physiol Meas; 2006 May; 27(5):S25-42. PubMed ID: 16636416
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. EIT reconstructions and Faddeev solutions for a numerically simulated phantom chest.
Mueller JL
Biomed Sci Instrum; 2004; 40():213-8. PubMed ID: 15133960
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Dynamic electrical impedance imaging of a chest phantom using the Kalman filter.
Kim BS; Kim KY; Kao TJ; Newell JC; Isaacson D; Saulnier GJ
Physiol Meas; 2006 May; 27(5):S81-91. PubMed ID: 16636422
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Harmonic decomposition in PDE-based denoising technique for magnetic resonance electrical impedance tomography.
Lee BI; Lee SH; Kim TS; Kwon O; Woo EJ; Seo JK
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2005 Nov; 52(11):1912-20. PubMed ID: 16285395
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. A novel approach for EIT regularization via spatial and spectral principal component analysis.
Goharian M; Bruwer MJ; Jegatheesan A; Moran GR; MacGregor JF
Physiol Meas; 2007 Sep; 28(9):1001-16. PubMed ID: 17827649
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Factorization method and its physical justification in frequency-difference electrical impedance tomography.
Harrach B; Seo JK; Woo EJ
IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2010 Nov; 29(11):1918-26. PubMed ID: 20570764
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Robust linearized image reconstruction for multifrequency EIT of the breast.
Boverman G; Kao TJ; Kulkarni R; Kim BS; Isaacson D; Saulnier GJ; Newell JC
IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2008 Oct; 27(10):1439-48. PubMed ID: 18815096
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Use of anisotropic modelling in electrical impedance tomography: description of method and preliminary assessment of utility in imaging brain function in the adult human head.
Abascal JF; Arridge SR; Atkinson D; Horesh R; Fabrizi L; De Lucia M; Horesh L; Bayford RH; Holder DS
Neuroimage; 2008 Nov; 43(2):258-68. PubMed ID: 18694835
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. J-substitution algorithm in magnetic resonance electrical impedance tomography (MREIT): phantom experiments for static resistivity images.
Khang HS; Lee BI; Oh SH; Woo EJ; Lee SY; Cho MH; Kwon O; Yoon JR; Seo JK
IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2002 Jun; 21(6):695-702. PubMed ID: 12166867
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Reconstruction of the shape of conductivity spectra using differential multi-frequency magnetic induction tomography.
Brunner P; Merwa R; Missner A; Rosell J; Hollaus K; Scharfetter H
Physiol Meas; 2006 May; 27(5):S237-48. PubMed ID: 16636414
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. A reconstruction algorithm for breast cancer imaging with electrical impedance tomography in mammography geometry.
Choi MH; Kao TJ; Isaacson D; Saulnier GJ; Newell JC
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2007 Apr; 54(4):700-10. PubMed ID: 17405377
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Bioimpedance tomography (electrical impedance tomography).
Bayford RH
Annu Rev Biomed Eng; 2006; 8():63-91. PubMed ID: 16834552
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
