139 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16636405)
41. J-substitution algorithm in magnetic resonance electrical impedance tomography (MREIT): phantom experiments for static resistivity images.
Khang HS; Lee BI; Oh SH; Woo EJ; Lee SY; Cho MH; Kwon O; Yoon JR; Seo JK
IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2002 Jun; 21(6):695-702. PubMed ID: 12166867
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. Use of anisotropic modelling in electrical impedance tomography: description of method and preliminary assessment of utility in imaging brain function in the adult human head.
Abascal JF; Arridge SR; Atkinson D; Horesh R; Fabrizi L; De Lucia M; Horesh L; Bayford RH; Holder DS
Neuroimage; 2008 Nov; 43(2):258-68. PubMed ID: 18694835
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. A fast parallel solver for the forward problem in electrical impedance tomography.
Jehl M; Dedner A; Betcke T; Aristovich K; Klöfkorn R; Holder D
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2015 Jan; 62(1):126-37. PubMed ID: 25069109
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. Error analysis of nonconstant admittivity for MR-based electric property imaging.
Seo JK; Kim MO; Lee J; Choi N; Woo EJ; Kim HJ; Kwon OI; Kim DH
IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2012 Feb; 31(2):430-7. PubMed ID: 21990329
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. Lobe based image reconstruction in Electrical Impedance Tomography.
Schullcke B; Gong B; Krueger-Ziolek S; Tawhai M; Adler A; Mueller-Lisse U; Moeller K
Med Phys; 2017 Feb; 44(2):426-436. PubMed ID: 28121374
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. Nonlinear Difference Imaging Approach to Three-Dimensional Electrical Impedance Tomography in the Presence of Geometric Modeling Errors.
Liu D; Kolehmainen V; Siltanen S; Laukkanen AM; Seppanen A
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2016 Sep; 63(9):1956-1965. PubMed ID: 26685224
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. An efficient forward solver in electrical impedance tomography by spectral element method.
Lim KH; Lee JH; Ye G; Liu QH
IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2006 Aug; 25(8):1044-51. PubMed ID: 16894997
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Methods for compensating for variable electrode contact in EIT.
Boverman G; Isaacson D; Saulnier GJ; Newell JC
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2009 Dec; 56(12):2762-72. PubMed ID: 19628445
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Detecting cryoablation with EIT and the benefit of including ice front imaging data.
Edd JF; Rubinsky B
Physiol Meas; 2006 May; 27(5):S175-85. PubMed ID: 16636409
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Investigation on magnetoacoustic signal generation with magnetic induction and its application to electrical conductivity reconstruction.
Ma Q; He B
Phys Med Biol; 2007 Aug; 52(16):5085-99. PubMed ID: 17671355
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. A method for modelling and optimizing an electrical impedance tomography system.
Hartinger AE; Gagnon H; Guardo R
Physiol Meas; 2006 May; 27(5):S51-64. PubMed ID: 16636420
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Electrical impedance tomography imaging using a priori ultrasound data.
Soleimani M
Biomed Eng Online; 2006 Feb; 5():8. PubMed ID: 16460573
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. Gradient distortion correction for low frequency current density imaging.
Yan CX; DeMonte TP; Joy ML
Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2006; 2006():260-3. PubMed ID: 17945973
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. Comparison of different methods to define regions of interest for evaluation of regional lung ventilation by EIT.
Pulletz S; van Genderingen HR; Schmitz G; Zick G; Schädler D; Scholz J; Weiler N; Frerichs I
Physiol Meas; 2006 May; 27(5):S115-27. PubMed ID: 16636403
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Three-dimensional electrical impedance tomography: a topology optimization approach.
Mello LA; de Lima CR; Amato MB; Lima RG; Silva EC
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2008 Feb; 55(2 Pt 1):531-40. PubMed ID: 18269988
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. Multi-frequency electrical impedance tomography (EIT) of the adult human head: initial findings in brain tumours, arteriovenous malformations and chronic stroke, development of an analysis method and calibration.
Romsauerova A; McEwan A; Horesh L; Yerworth R; Bayford RH; Holder DS
Physiol Meas; 2006 May; 27(5):S147-61. PubMed ID: 16636407
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Front-tracking image reconstruction algorithm for EIT-monitored cryosurgery using the boundary element method.
Otten DM; Rubinsky B
Physiol Meas; 2005 Aug; 26(4):503-16. PubMed ID: 15886444
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. Current density impedance imaging.
Hasanov KF; Ma AW; Nachman AI; Joy ML
IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2008 Sep; 27(9):1301-9. PubMed ID: 18753045
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. Quantitative conductivity and permittivity imaging of the human brain using electric properties tomography.
Voigt T; Katscher U; Doessel O
Magn Reson Med; 2011 Aug; 66(2):456-66. PubMed ID: 21773985
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. A Versatile Noise Performance Metric for Electrical Impedance Tomography Algorithms.
Braun F; Proenca M; Sola J; Thiran JP; Adler A
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2017 Oct; 64(10):2321-2330. PubMed ID: 28141516
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
