These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

241 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16636416)

  • 41. Bioimpedance tomography (electrical impedance tomography).
    Bayford RH
    Annu Rev Biomed Eng; 2006; 8():63-91. PubMed ID: 16834552
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Use of anisotropic modelling in electrical impedance tomography: description of method and preliminary assessment of utility in imaging brain function in the adult human head.
    Abascal JF; Arridge SR; Atkinson D; Horesh R; Fabrizi L; De Lucia M; Horesh L; Bayford RH; Holder DS
    Neuroimage; 2008 Nov; 43(2):258-68. PubMed ID: 18694835
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Excitation patterns in three-dimensional electrical impedance tomography.
    Dehghani H; Soni N; Halter R; Hartov A; Paulsen KD
    Physiol Meas; 2005 Apr; 26(2):S185-97. PubMed ID: 15798231
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Imaging cardiac activity by the D-bar method for electrical impedance tomography.
    Isaacson D; Mueller JL; Newell JC; Siltanen S
    Physiol Meas; 2006 May; 27(5):S43-50. PubMed ID: 16636419
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Effects of incompatible boundary information in EIT on the convergence behavior of an iterative algorithm.
    Tang M; Wang W; Wheeler J; McCormick M; Dong X
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2002 Jun; 21(6):620-8. PubMed ID: 12166858
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Development of a customizable software application for medical imaging analysis and visualization.
    Martinez-Escobar M; Peloquin C; Juhnke B; Peddicord J; Jose S; Noon C; Foo JL; Winer E
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2011; 163():343-7. PubMed ID: 21335815
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Simple linear models of scanning impedance imaging for fast reconstruction of relative conductivity of biological samples.
    Oliphant TE; Liu H; Hawkins AR; Schultz SM
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2006 Nov; 53(11):2323-32. PubMed ID: 17073338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Electromagnetic impedance tomography (EMIT): a new method for impedance imaging.
    Levy S; Adam D; Bresler Y
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2002 Jun; 21(6):676-87. PubMed ID: 12166865
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Error analysis of nonconstant admittivity for MR-based electric property imaging.
    Seo JK; Kim MO; Lee J; Choi N; Woo EJ; Kim HJ; Kwon OI; Kim DH
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2012 Feb; 31(2):430-7. PubMed ID: 21990329
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. A comparison of techniques to optimize measurement of voltage changes in electrical impedance tomography by minimizing phase shift errors.
    Fitzgerald AJ; Holder DS; Eadie L; Hare C; Bayford RH
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2002 Jun; 21(6):668-75. PubMed ID: 12166864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Optimum design of electrode structure and parameters in electrical impedance tomography.
    Yan W; Hong S; Chaoshi R
    Physiol Meas; 2006 Mar; 27(3):291-306. PubMed ID: 16462015
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Investigation on magnetoacoustic signal generation with magnetic induction and its application to electrical conductivity reconstruction.
    Ma Q; He B
    Phys Med Biol; 2007 Aug; 52(16):5085-99. PubMed ID: 17671355
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Study of the optimum level of electrode placement for the evaluation of absolute lung resistivity with the Mk3.5 EIT system.
    Nebuya S; Noshiro M; Yonemoto A; Tateno S; Brown BH; Smallwood RH; Milnes P
    Physiol Meas; 2006 May; 27(5):S129-37. PubMed ID: 16636404
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Magnetic resonance electrical impedance tomography (MREIT) for high-resolution conductivity imaging.
    Woo EJ; Seo JK
    Physiol Meas; 2008 Oct; 29(10):R1-26. PubMed ID: 18799834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Electrical impedance tomography imaging using a priori ultrasound data.
    Soleimani M
    Biomed Eng Online; 2006 Feb; 5():8. PubMed ID: 16460573
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. [Artifacts in optical coherence tomography (OCT) imaging of the retina].
    Strauss RW; Scholz F; Ulbig MW; Kampik A; Neubauer AS
    Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 2007 Jan; 224(1):47-51. PubMed ID: 17260319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. An image reconstruction algorithm for three-dimensional electrical impedance tomography.
    Le Hyaric A; Pidcock MK
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2001 Feb; 48(2):230-5. PubMed ID: 11296879
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Multi-parameter ultrasound transmission tomography of biological media.
    Opielinski KJ; Gudra T
    Ultrasonics; 2006 Dec; 44 Suppl 1():e295-302. PubMed ID: 17005227
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Factorization method and its physical justification in frequency-difference electrical impedance tomography.
    Harrach B; Seo JK; Woo EJ
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2010 Nov; 29(11):1918-26. PubMed ID: 20570764
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Reducing boundary effects in static EIT imaging.
    Kao TJ; Kim BS; Isaacson D; Newell JC; Saulnier GJ
    Physiol Meas; 2006 May; 27(5):S13-23. PubMed ID: 16636405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.