BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

125 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16636422)

  • 1. Dynamic electrical impedance imaging of a chest phantom using the Kalman filter.
    Kim BS; Kim KY; Kao TJ; Newell JC; Isaacson D; Saulnier GJ
    Physiol Meas; 2006 May; 27(5):S81-91. PubMed ID: 16636422
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Dynamic electrical impedance imaging with the interacting multiple model scheme.
    Kim KY; Kim BS; Kim MC; Kim S; Isaacson D; Newell JC
    Physiol Meas; 2005 Apr; 26(2):S217-33. PubMed ID: 15798235
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. EIT reconstructions and Faddeev solutions for a numerically simulated phantom chest.
    Mueller JL
    Biomed Sci Instrum; 2004; 40():213-8. PubMed ID: 15133960
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Imaging cardiac activity by the D-bar method for electrical impedance tomography.
    Isaacson D; Mueller JL; Newell JC; Siltanen S
    Physiol Meas; 2006 May; 27(5):S43-50. PubMed ID: 16636419
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Static imaging of the electrical impedance tomography on cylinder physical phantom.
    Liu R; Fu F; You F; Shi X; Dong X
    Biomed Mater Eng; 2015; 26 Suppl 1():S1381-8. PubMed ID: 26405899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Three-dimensional electrical impedance tomography: a topology optimization approach.
    Mello LA; de Lima CR; Amato MB; Lima RG; Silva EC
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2008 Feb; 55(2 Pt 1):531-40. PubMed ID: 18269988
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Objective selection of hyperparameter for EIT.
    Graham BM; Adler A
    Physiol Meas; 2006 May; 27(5):S65-79. PubMed ID: 16636421
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Stable reconstruction of piecewise continuous plane stratified biological tissues via electrical impedance tomography.
    Dolgin M; Einziger PD
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2010 May; 57(5):1227-33. PubMed ID: 20142149
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Electrical impedance tomography problem with inaccurately known boundary and contact impedances.
    Kolehmainen V; Lassas M; Ola P
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2008 Oct; 27(10):1404-14. PubMed ID: 18815092
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Reducing boundary effects in static EIT imaging.
    Kao TJ; Kim BS; Isaacson D; Newell JC; Saulnier GJ
    Physiol Meas; 2006 May; 27(5):S13-23. PubMed ID: 16636405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A reconstruction algorithm for breast cancer imaging with electrical impedance tomography in mammography geometry.
    Choi MH; Kao TJ; Isaacson D; Saulnier GJ; Newell JC
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2007 Apr; 54(4):700-10. PubMed ID: 17405377
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Imaging of conductivity changes and electrode movement in EIT.
    Soleimani M; Gómez-Laberge C; Adler A
    Physiol Meas; 2006 May; 27(5):S103-13. PubMed ID: 16636402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Electrical impedance tomography using the extended Kalman filter.
    Trigo FC; Gonzalez-Lima R; Amato MB
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2004 Jan; 51(1):72-81. PubMed ID: 14723496
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Electrode boundary conditions and experimental validation for BEM-based EIT forward and inverse solutions.
    Babaeizadeh S; Brooks DH; Isaacson D; Newell JC
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2006 Sep; 25(9):1180-8. PubMed ID: 16967803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Improving the forward solver for the complete electrode model in EIT using algebraic multigrid.
    Soleimani M; Powell CE; Polydorides N
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2005 May; 24(5):577-83. PubMed ID: 15889545
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Direct reconstruction of tissue parameters from differential multifrequency EIT in vivo.
    Mayer M; Brunner P; Merwa R; Smolle-Jüttner FM; Maier A; Scharfetter H
    Physiol Meas; 2006 May; 27(5):S93-101. PubMed ID: 16636423
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Phase artefact reduction in magnetic resonance electrical impedance tomography (MREIT).
    Lee BI; Park C; Pyo HC; Kwon O; Woo EJ
    Phys Med Biol; 2006 Oct; 51(20):5277-88. PubMed ID: 17019038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Solution of the inverse problem of magnetic induction tomography (MIT).
    Merwa R; Hollaus K; Brunner P; Scharfetter H
    Physiol Meas; 2005 Apr; 26(2):S241-50. PubMed ID: 15798237
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Dynamic imaging in electrical impedance tomography of the human chest with online transition matrix identification.
    Moura FS; Aya JC; Fleury AT; Amato MB; Lima RG
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2010 Feb; 57(2):422-31. PubMed ID: 19789101
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Induced current magnetic resonance-electrical impedance tomography.
    Ozparlak L; Ider YZ
    Physiol Meas; 2005 Apr; 26(2):S289-305. PubMed ID: 15798242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.