These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
5. Signal reliability modulates auditory-tactile integration for event counting. Bresciani JP; Ernst MO Neuroreport; 2007 Jul; 18(11):1157-61. PubMed ID: 17589318 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Lost in the move? Secondary task performance impairs tactile change detection on the body. Gallace A; Zeeden S; Röder B; Spence C Conscious Cogn; 2010 Mar; 19(1):215-29. PubMed ID: 19647451 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Why two "Distractors" are better than one: modeling the effect of non-target auditory and tactile stimuli on visual saccadic reaction time. Diederich A; Colonius H Exp Brain Res; 2007 May; 179(1):43-54. PubMed ID: 17216154 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The multisensory attentional consequences of tool use: a functional magnetic resonance imaging study. Holmes NP; Spence C; Hansen PC; Mackay CE; Calvert GA PLoS One; 2008; 3(10):e3502. PubMed ID: 18958150 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Multisensory stimulation with or without saccades: fMRI evidence for crossmodal effects on sensory-specific cortices that reflect multisensory location-congruence rather than task-relevance. Macaluso E; Frith CD; Driver J Neuroimage; 2005 Jun; 26(2):414-25. PubMed ID: 15907299 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Interhemispheric interactions and redundancy gain: tests of an interhemispheric inhibition hypothesis. Miller J Exp Brain Res; 2007 Jul; 180(3):389-413. PubMed ID: 17287988 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Visual and tactile interhemispheric transfer compared with the method of Poffenberger. Fendrich R; Hutsler JJ; Gazzaniga MS Exp Brain Res; 2004 Sep; 158(1):67-74. PubMed ID: 15054567 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Cross-modal psychological refractory period in vision, audition, and haptics. Rau PP; Zheng J Atten Percept Psychophys; 2020 May; 82(4):1573-1585. PubMed ID: 32052346 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Lost in vision: ERP correlates of exogenous tactile attention when engaging in a visual task. Jones A; Forster B Neuropsychologia; 2013 Mar; 51(4):675-85. PubMed ID: 23340481 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Multisensory interaction in saccadic reaction time: a time-window-of-integration model. Colonius H; Diederich A J Cogn Neurosci; 2004; 16(6):1000-9. PubMed ID: 15298787 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Spatial tuning of tactile attention modulates visual processing within hemifields: an ERP investigation of crossmodal attention. Eimer M; van Velzen J Exp Brain Res; 2005 Oct; 166(3-4):402-10. PubMed ID: 16034566 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Enhancement of response times to bi- and tri-modal sensory stimuli during active movements. Hecht D; Reiner M; Karni A Exp Brain Res; 2008 Mar; 185(4):655-65. PubMed ID: 17992522 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Redundant target effect and intersensory facilitation from visual-tactile interactions in simple reaction time. Forster B; Cavina-Pratesi C; Aglioti SM; Berlucchi G Exp Brain Res; 2002 Apr; 143(4):480-7. PubMed ID: 11914794 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The contribution of response conflict, multisensory integration, and body-mediated attention to the crossmodal congruency effect. Marini F; Romano D; Maravita A Exp Brain Res; 2017 Mar; 235(3):873-887. PubMed ID: 27913817 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. An ERP investigation on visuotactile interactions in peripersonal and extrapersonal space: evidence for the spatial rule. Sambo CF; Forster B J Cogn Neurosci; 2009 Aug; 21(8):1550-9. PubMed ID: 18767919 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]