These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
150 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16637713)
41. Effects of latency on the quality and quantity of bone produced by dentoalveolar distraction osteogenesis. Moore C; Campbell PM; Dechow PC; Ellis ML; Buschang PH Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2011 Oct; 140(4):470-8. PubMed ID: 21967933 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. [Dental assisted distraction osteogenesis of the mandible. Results of an animal experimental study and initial clinical application]. Braumann B; Niederhagen B; Schmolke C; von Lindern JJ Mund Kiefer Gesichtschir; 1999 Jan; 3(1):6-11. PubMed ID: 10077960 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. Anterior alveolar segmental osteodistraction with a bone-borne device: clinical and radiographic evaluation. Metzler P; Obwegeser JA; Jacobsen C; Zemann W J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2012 Nov; 70(11):2549-58. PubMed ID: 23078822 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. Induced osteogenesis by periosteal distraction. Schmidt BL; Kung L; Jones C; Casap N J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2002 Oct; 60(10):1170-5. PubMed ID: 12378493 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. Changes in the mandibular and dento-alveolar structures by the use of tooth borne mandibular symphyseal distraction devices. Seeberger R; Kater W; Davids R; Thiele OC; Edelmann B; Hofele C; Freier K J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2011 Apr; 39(3):177-81. PubMed ID: 20708944 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. Comparison of two preoperative protocols for mandibular symphyseal distraction osteogenesis to reduce the risk of tooth damage. Winsauer H; Ploder O; Juengling K; Walter A; Kolk A J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2017 Apr; 45(4):540-546. PubMed ID: 28189490 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. Expression of vascular endothelial growth factor and its receptors after mandibular distraction osteogenesis. Byun JH; Park BW; Kim JR; Lee JH Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2007 Apr; 36(4):338-44. PubMed ID: 17250992 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Distraction osteogenesis to widen the mandible. Bell WH; Harper RP; Gonzalez M; Cherkashin AM; Samchukov ML Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 1997 Feb; 35(1):11-9. PubMed ID: 9042998 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Rapid orthodontic tooth movement into newly distracted bone after mandibular distraction osteogenesis in a canine model. Liou EJ; Figueroa AA; Polley JW Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2000 Apr; 117(4):391-8. PubMed ID: 10756264 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Immunohistochemical analysis of reconstructed sheep mandibles: transport distraction osteogenesis versus autogenous bone grafting. Çakır-Özkan N; Eyibilen A; Özkan F; Gülbahar MY; Kabak YB J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2011 Apr; 69(4):1248-54. PubMed ID: 21055857 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Anterior transmandibular osteodistraction: clinical and model observations. Mommaerts MY; Polsbroek R; Santler G; Correia PE; Abeloos JV; Ali N J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2005 Oct; 33(5):318-25. PubMed ID: 16139505 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Preliminary investigation into the effects of electrical stimulation on mandibular distraction osteogenesis in goats. El-Hakim IE; Azim AM; El-Hassan MF; Maree SM Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2004 Jan; 33(1):42-7. PubMed ID: 14690658 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. Ultrasound to stimulate early bone formation in a distraction gap: a double blind randomised clinical pilot trial in the edentulous mandible. Schortinghuis J; Bronckers AL; Stegenga B; Raghoebar GM; de Bont LG Arch Oral Biol; 2005 Apr; 50(4):411-20. PubMed ID: 15748694 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Transport disc distraction osteogenesis for the reconstruction of a calvarial defect. Hong JW; Song SY; Woo DG; Kim HS; Hong HJ; Choi JH; Park BY; Kim YO J Craniofac Surg; 2009 May; 20(3):790-6. PubMed ID: 19480040 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. Reconstruction of mandibular symphyseal defects by trifocal distraction osteogenesis: an experimental study in Rhesus. Li J; Ying B; Hu J; Zhu S; Braun TW Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2006 Feb; 35(2):159-64. PubMed ID: 16185847 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Six year follow-up of a patient treated with mandibular symphyseal distraction osteogenesis. Sukurica Y; Gurel HG; Mutlu N J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2010 Jan; 38(1):26-31. PubMed ID: 19682916 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. Analysis of new bone formation induced by periosteal distraction in a rat calvarium model. Saulacic N; Schaller B; Iizuka T; Buser D; Hug C; Bosshardt DD Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2013 Apr; 15(2):283-91. PubMed ID: 21554531 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. Development of distraction osteogenesis model of the inferior mandibular border and alveolar bone. Moon HS; Kim HJ; Teribish M; Park JT; Cha JY J Craniofac Surg; 2011 Mar; 22(2):715-9. PubMed ID: 21415642 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. Distraction osteogenesis of free interpositional membranous bone: experimental design. Cho BC; Lee JH; Baik BS; Liou EJ; Figueroa AA; Cohen M J Craniofac Surg; 1999 Mar; 10(2):123-7; discussion 128. PubMed ID: 10388412 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]