These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
5. Relation between anthropometric and cephalometric measurements and proportions of the face of healthy young white adult men and women. Budai M; Farkas LG; Tompson B; Katic M; Forrest CR J Craniofac Surg; 2003 Mar; 14(2):154-61; discussion 162-3. PubMed ID: 12621284 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Differences in dentofacial characteristics between southern versus northern Chinese adolescents. Gu Y; Hagg U; Wu J; Yeung S Aust Orthod J; 2011 Nov; 27(2):155-61. PubMed ID: 22372272 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Soft tissue cephalometric norms for a North Indian population group using Legan and Burstone analysis. Jain P; Kalra JP Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2011 Mar; 40(3):255-9. PubMed ID: 20965694 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of cephalometric norms between Japanese and Caucasian adults in antero-posterior and vertical dimension. Ioi H; Nakata S; Nakasima A; Counts AL Eur J Orthod; 2007 Oct; 29(5):493-9. PubMed ID: 17974539 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Cephalometric soft tissue profile analysis between two different ethnic groups: a comparative study. Hashim HA; AlBarakati SF J Contemp Dent Pract; 2003 May; 4(2):60-73. PubMed ID: 12761590 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Longitudinal study of cephalometric soft tissue profile traits between the ages of 6 and 18 years. Bergman RT; Waschak J; Borzabadi-Farahani A; Murphy NC Angle Orthod; 2014 Jan; 84(1):48-55. PubMed ID: 23834271 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Cephalometric norms for the Chinese: a compilation of existing data. Moate SJ; Darendeliler MA Aust Orthod J; 2002 Mar; 18(1):19-26. PubMed ID: 12502125 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of soft tissue cephalometric norms between Turkish and European-American adults. Celebi AA; Tan E; Gelgor IE; Colak T; Ayyildiz E ScientificWorldJournal; 2013; 2013():806203. PubMed ID: 23533362 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Standards of soft tissue Arnett analysis for surgical planning in Turkish adults. Uysal T; Yagci A; Basciftci FA; Sisman Y Eur J Orthod; 2009 Aug; 31(4):449-56. PubMed ID: 19482876 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Cephalometric norms of a Burkina Faso population. Ouédraogo Y; Benyahia H; Diouf JS; Camara T; Bationo R; Ngom PI Int Orthod; 2019 Mar; 17(1):136-142. PubMed ID: 30772356 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Three-dimensional facial architecture in normodivergent class I Caucasian subjects. Ghoubril JV; Abou Obeid FM Odontostomatol Trop; 2013 Jun; 36(142):5-14. PubMed ID: 24073535 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Soft-tissue profile growth in patients with repaired complete unilateral cleft lip and palate: A cephalometric comparison with normal controls at ages 7, 11, and 18 years. Moreira I; Suri S; Ross B; Tompson B; Fisher D; Lou W Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2014 Mar; 145(3):341-58. PubMed ID: 24582026 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Natural craniofacial changes in the third decade of life: a longitudinal study. Akgül AA; Toygar TU Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2002 Nov; 122(5):512-22. PubMed ID: 12439480 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Smile analysis in different facial patterns and its correlation with underlying hard tissues. Grover N; Kapoor DN; Verma S; Bharadwaj P Prog Orthod; 2015; 16():28. PubMed ID: 26341345 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]