These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

189 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16637762)

  • 1. Using dynamic field theory to rethink infant habituation.
    Schöner G; Thelen E
    Psychol Rev; 2006 Apr; 113(2):273-99. PubMed ID: 16637762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Infants' detection of correlations among feature categories.
    Younger B
    Child Dev; 1990 Jun; 61(3):614-20. PubMed ID: 2364738
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Sensitization during visual habituation sequences: procedural effects and individual differences.
    Colombo J; Frick JE; Gorman SA
    J Exp Child Psychol; 1997 Nov; 67(2):223-35. PubMed ID: 9388807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. An interacting systems model of infant habituation.
    Sirois S; Mareschal D
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2004 Oct; 16(8):1352-62. PubMed ID: 15509383
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Individual differences in the visual attention of human infants: further evidence for separate sensitization and habituation processes.
    Peterzell DH
    Dev Psychobiol; 1993 May; 26(4):207-18. PubMed ID: 8354426
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Sustained visual attention in young infants measured with an adapted version of the visual preference paradigm.
    Casey BJ; Richards JE
    Child Dev; 1988 Dec; 59(6):1514-21. PubMed ID: 3208563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A theory of dynamic occluded and illusory object perception.
    Palmer EM; Kellman PJ; Shipley TF
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2006 Nov; 135(4):513-41. PubMed ID: 17087570
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Categorization in infancy: differentiation of global object classes].
    Pauen S
    Z Exp Psychol; 1996; 43(4):600-24. PubMed ID: 9206586
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Repetition suppression of induced gamma activity predicts enhanced orienting toward a novel stimulus in 6-month-old infants.
    Snyder KA; Keil A
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2008 Dec; 20(12):2137-52. PubMed ID: 18457506
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A coherent computational approach to model bottom-up visual attention.
    Le Meur O; Le Callet P; Barba D; Thoreau D
    IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell; 2006 May; 28(5):802-17. PubMed ID: 16640265
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The comparator model of infant visual habituation and dishabituation: recent insights.
    Kavšek M
    Dev Psychobiol; 2013 Dec; 55(8):793-808. PubMed ID: 22975795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Perception of numerical invariance in neonates.
    Antell SE; Keating DP
    Child Dev; 1983 Jun; 54(3):695-701. PubMed ID: 6851716
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Interpreting infant looking: the event set x event set design.
    Bogartz RS; Shinskey JL; Speaker CJ
    Dev Psychol; 1997 May; 33(3):408-22. PubMed ID: 9149920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Habituation, response to novelty, and dishabituation in human infants: tests of a dual-process theory of visual attention.
    Kaplan PS; Werner JS
    J Exp Child Psychol; 1986 Oct; 42(2):199-217. PubMed ID: 3760775
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Dissociations between featural versus conjunction-based texture processing in infancy: analyses of three potential contributing factors.
    Bertin E; Bhatt RS
    J Exp Child Psychol; 2001 Mar; 78(3):291-311. PubMed ID: 11222003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Gaze behavior in infancy as an indicator of information processing].
    Kavsek MJ
    Prax Kinderpsychol Kinderpsychiatr; 1995 Dec; 44(10):383-90. PubMed ID: 8975233
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Infants' ability to parse continuous actions.
    Hespos SJ; Saylor MM; Grossman SR
    Dev Psychol; 2009 Mar; 45(2):575-85. PubMed ID: 19271840
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Test sequence priming in recognition memory.
    Johns EE; Mewhort DJ
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2009 Sep; 35(5):1162-74. PubMed ID: 19686012
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Interpreting visual preferences in the visual paired-comparison task.
    Richmond J; Colombo M; Hayne H
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2007 Sep; 33(5):823-31. PubMed ID: 17723062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The effects of preference for visual complexity on habituation of visual fixation in infants.
    Brown CJ
    Child Dev; 1974 Dec; 45(4):1166-9. PubMed ID: 4143874
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.