These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
100 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16637999)
41. Temperature-dependent alterations in host use drive rapid range expansion in a butterfly. Pateman RM; Hill JK; Roy DB; Fox R; Thomas CD Science; 2012 May; 336(6084):1028-30. PubMed ID: 22628653 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. A behaviorally explicit demographic model integrating habitat selection and population dynamics in california sea lions. González-Suárez M; Gerber LR Conserv Biol; 2008 Dec; 22(6):1608-18. PubMed ID: 18680502 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. Minimum area requirements for an at-risk butterfly based on movement and demography. Brown LM; Crone EE Conserv Biol; 2016 Feb; 30(1):103-12. PubMed ID: 26174312 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. Investigating long-term ecological variability using the Global Population Dynamics Database. Inchausti P; Halley J Science; 2001 Jul; 293(5530):655-7. PubMed ID: 11474102 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. Encroaching forests decouple alpine butterfly population dynamics. Roland J; Matter SF Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2007 Aug; 104(34):13702-4. PubMed ID: 17699630 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. Relative Contribution of Matrix Structure, Patch Resources and Management to the Local Densities of Two Large Blue Butterfly Species. Kajzer-Bonk J; Skórka P; Nowicki P; Bonk M; Król W; Szpiłyk D; Woyciechowski M PLoS One; 2016; 11(12):e0168679. PubMed ID: 28005942 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. Short-term studies underestimate 30-generation changes in a butterfly metapopulation. Thomas CD; Wilson RJ; Lewis OT Proc Biol Sci; 2002 Mar; 269(1491):563-9. PubMed ID: 11916471 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Butterfly abundance and movements among prairie patches: the roles of habitat quality, edge, and forest matrix permeability. Stasek DJ; Bean C; Crist TO Environ Entomol; 2008 Aug; 37(4):897-906. PubMed ID: 18801255 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Monarch butterfly spatially discrete advection model. Yakubu AA; Sáenz R; Stein J; Jones LE Math Biosci; 2004 Aug; 190(2):183-202. PubMed ID: 15234616 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Local species immigration, extinction, and turnover of butterflies in relation to habitat area and habitat isolation. Krauss J; Steffan-Dewenter I; Tscharntke T Oecologia; 2003 Dec; 137(4):591-602. PubMed ID: 14505022 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Mechanism matters: the cause of fluctuations in boom-bust populations governs optimal habitat restoration strategy. Himes Boor GK; Schultz CB; Crone EE; Morris WF Ecol Appl; 2018 Mar; 28(2):356-372. PubMed ID: 29164716 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Negative relationship between dispersal distance and demography in butterfly metapopulations. Baguette M; Schtickzelle N Ecology; 2006 Mar; 87(3):648-54. PubMed ID: 16602294 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. Long range dispersal in checkerspot butterflies: Transplant experiments with Euphydryas gillettii. Holdren CE; Ehrlich PR Oecologia; 1981 Aug; 50(1):125-129. PubMed ID: 28310073 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. Heterospecific courtship, minority effects and niche separation between cryptic butterfly species. Friberg M; Leimar O; Wiklund C J Evol Biol; 2013 May; 26(5):971-9. PubMed ID: 23480828 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Polyommatus ripartii: the biological basis for the conservation and the morphology of the developmental stages of a critically endangered, relict population in central Europe. Przybyłowicz Ł J Insect Sci; 2014; 14():. PubMed ID: 25525109 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. Estimates of minimum patch size depend on the method of estimation and the condition of the habitat. McCoy ED; Mushinsky HR Ecology; 2007 Jun; 88(6):1401-7. PubMed ID: 17601133 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Evidence for positive density-dependent emigration in butterfly metapopulations. Nowicki P; Vrabec V Oecologia; 2011 Nov; 167(3):657-65. PubMed ID: 21625981 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. Individual variation changes dispersal distance and area requirements of a checkerspot butterfly. Brown LM; Crone EE Ecology; 2016 Jan; 97(1):106-15. PubMed ID: 27008780 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. Patch dynamics ofGlaucopsyche lygdamus (Lycaenidae): correlations between butterfly density and host species diversity. Carey DB Oecologia; 1994 Sep; 99(3-4):337-342. PubMed ID: 28313889 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. Learning about colonization when managing metapopulations under an adaptive management framework. Southwell DM; Hauser CE; McCarthy MA Ecol Appl; 2016 Jan; 26(1):279-94. PubMed ID: 27039525 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]