These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

116 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16638231)

  • 1. Principles of survey development for telemedicine applications.
    Demiris G
    J Telemed Telecare; 2006; 12(3):111-5. PubMed ID: 16638231
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The development of a survey instrument for community health improvement.
    Bazos DA; Weeks WB; Fisher ES; DeBlois HA; Hamilton E; Young MJ
    Health Serv Res; 2001 Aug; 36(4):773-92. PubMed ID: 11508639
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The Comprehensive Prevention Knowledge and Applications Survey Instrument: its validity and reliability.
    Moser R; McCance KL; Smith KR
    Am J Prev Med; 1991; 7(3):136-40. PubMed ID: 1931140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Evaluating health plan quality 2: survey design principles for measuring health plan quality.
    Wholey DR; Christianson JB; Finch M; Knutson D; Rockwood T; Warrick L;
    Am J Manag Care; 2003 Jun; 9 Spec No 2():SP65-75. PubMed ID: 12822716
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Validity and reliability of an oral care practice survey for the orally intubated adult critically ill patient.
    Feider LL; Mitchell P
    Nurs Res; 2009; 58(5):374-7. PubMed ID: 19680163
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The design and assessment of questionnaires in clinical research.
    Saw SM; Ng TP
    Singapore Med J; 2001 Mar; 42(3):131-5. PubMed ID: 11405568
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Chapter VI. Measurement of interviewer errors in the SRC Telephone Survey.
    Groves RM; Magilavy LJ
    Vital Health Stat 2; 1987 Aug; (106):40-6. PubMed ID: 15791755
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Design and operation of the National Survey of Children with Special Health Care Needs, 2005-2006.
    Blumberg SJ; Welch EM; Chowdhury SR; Upchurch HL; Parker EK; Skalland BJ
    Vital Health Stat 1; 2008 Dec; (45):1-188. PubMed ID: 19284158
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Surveys: an introduction.
    Rubenfeld GD
    Respir Care; 2004 Oct; 49(10):1181-5. PubMed ID: 15447800
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Issues in nursing: strategies for an Internet-based, computer-assisted telephone survey.
    Piamjariyakul U; Bott MJ; Taunton RL
    West J Nurs Res; 2006 Aug; 28(5):602-9. PubMed ID: 16829640
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Reliability and validity of a questionnaire to measure colorectal cancer screening behaviors: does mode of survey administration matter?
    Vernon SW; Tiro JA; Vojvodic RW; Coan S; Diamond PM; Greisinger A; Fernandez ME
    Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 2008 Apr; 17(4):758-67. PubMed ID: 18381467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. It's not just what you do, it's the way that you do it: the effect of different payment card formats and survey administration on willingness to pay for health gain.
    Smith RD
    Health Econ; 2006 Mar; 15(3):281-93. PubMed ID: 16200558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. An instrument for assessing public health system performance: validity in rural settings.
    Driscoll D; Rojas-Smith L; Sotnikov S; Gadsden-Knowles K; Perry NB; Lenaway DD; Halverson PK
    J Rural Health; 2006; 22(3):254-9. PubMed ID: 16824171
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Emotional care experienced by hospitalised patients: development and testing of a measurement instrument.
    Williams AM; Kristjanson LJ
    J Clin Nurs; 2009 Apr; 18(7):1069-77. PubMed ID: 19077011
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. From interview to instrument: how to develop a PS (patient satisfaction) survey.
    Pyzdek T
    Hosp Peer Rev; 1999 Mar; 24(3):43-5. PubMed ID: 10346272
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Design and operation of the National Asthma Survey.
    O'Connor KS; Osborn L; Olson L; Blumberg SJ; Frankel MR; Srinath KP; Giambo P
    Vital Health Stat 1; 2008 Aug; (46):1-122. PubMed ID: 18958992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Chapter IV. The effects of respondent rules on health survey reports.
    Mathiowetz NA; Groves RM
    Vital Health Stat 2; 1987 Aug; (106):26-32. PubMed ID: 15791753
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Refinement, scoring, and validation of the Family Satisfaction in the Intensive Care Unit (FS-ICU) survey.
    Wall RJ; Engelberg RA; Downey L; Heyland DK; Curtis JR
    Crit Care Med; 2007 Jan; 35(1):271-9. PubMed ID: 17133189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Classical test theory and item response theory analyses of multi-item scales assessing parents' perceptions of their children's dental care.
    Hays RD; Brown J; Brown LU; Spritzer KL; Crall JJ
    Med Care; 2006 Nov; 44(11 Suppl 3):S60-8. PubMed ID: 17060837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Teachers' perception of oral health status. Design and validation of an evaluation instrument.
    Bordoni N; Cadile Mdel C; Sotelo R; Squassi A
    Acta Odontol Latinoam; 2006; 19(2):67-74. PubMed ID: 17645213
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.