242 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16638704)
1. Endobiliary brush biopsy: Intra- and interobserver variation in cytological evaluation of brushings from bile duct strictures.
Adamsen S; Olsen M; Jendresen MB; Holck S; Glenthøj A
Scand J Gastroenterol; 2006 May; 41(5):597-603. PubMed ID: 16638704
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Prospective evaluation of brush cytology of biliary strictures during endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography.
Glasbrenner B; Ardan M; Boeck W; Preclik G; Möller P; Adler G
Endoscopy; 1999 Nov; 31(9):712-7. PubMed ID: 10604612
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Efficacy of endoscopic wire guided biliary brushing in the evaluation of biliary strictures.
Sachdev A; Duseja A; Bhalla A; Handa U; Sandhu BS; Gupta V; Kochhar S
Trop Gastroenterol; 2003; 24(4):215-7. PubMed ID: 15164539
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Brush cytology is superior to biopsies obtained by a new device in bile duct strictures.
Ung KA; Ljung A; Wågermark J; Lindholm J; Rydberg L; Kilander A; Stotzer PO; Burian P
Hepatogastroenterology; 2007; 54(75):664-8. PubMed ID: 17591037
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Brush cytology of the biliary tract: retrospective study of 278 cases with histopathologic correlation.
Govil H; Reddy V; Kluskens L; Treaba D; Massarani-Wafai R; Selvaggi S; Gattuso P
Diagn Cytopathol; 2002 May; 26(5):273-7. PubMed ID: 11992366
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Endoscopic brush cytology from the biliary duct system is still valuable.
Eiholm S; Thielsen P; Kromann-Andersen H
Dan Med J; 2013 Jul; 60(7):A4656. PubMed ID: 23809967
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A comparison of routine cytology and fluorescence in situ hybridization for the detection of malignant bile duct strictures.
Kipp BR; Stadheim LM; Halling SA; Pochron NL; Harmsen S; Nagorney DM; Sebo TJ; Therneau TM; Gores GJ; de Groen PC; Baron TH; Levy MJ; Halling KC; Roberts LR
Am J Gastroenterol; 2004 Sep; 99(9):1675-81. PubMed ID: 15330900
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Endoscopic retrograde wire-guided brush cytology for diagnosis of patients with malignant obstruction of the bile duct.
Foutch PG; Kerr DM; Harlan JR; Manne RK; Kummet TD; Sanowski RA
Am J Gastroenterol; 1990 Jul; 85(7):791-5. PubMed ID: 2164768
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Endobiliary brush cytology during percutaneous transhepatic cholangiodrainage in patients with obstructive jaundice.
Xing GS; Geng JC; Han XW; Dai JH; Wu CY
Hepatobiliary Pancreat Dis Int; 2005 Feb; 4(1):98-103. PubMed ID: 15730930
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Prospective, blinded assessment of factors influencing the accuracy of biliary cytology interpretation.
Harewood GC; Baron TH; Stadheim LM; Kipp BR; Sebo TJ; Salomao DR
Am J Gastroenterol; 2004 Aug; 99(8):1464-9. PubMed ID: 15307861
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Biliary brush cytology for the diagnosis of malignancy: a single center experience.
Stoos-Veić T; Bilić B; Kaić G; Ostović KT; Babić Z; Kujundzić M
Coll Antropol; 2010 Mar; 34(1):139-43. PubMed ID: 20432742
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Diagnostic utility of peroral cholangioscopy for various bile-duct lesions.
Fukuda Y; Tsuyuguchi T; Sakai Y; Tsuchiya S; Saisyo H
Gastrointest Endosc; 2005 Sep; 62(3):374-82. PubMed ID: 16111955
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Effectiveness of a new long cytology brush in the evaluation of malignant biliary obstruction: a prospective study.
Fogel EL; deBellis M; McHenry L; Watkins JL; Chappo J; Cramer H; Schmidt S; Lazzell-Pannell L; Sherman S; Lehman GA
Gastrointest Endosc; 2006 Jan; 63(1):71-7. PubMed ID: 16377319
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Intraductal optical coherence tomography during endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography for investigation of biliary strictures.
Arvanitakis M; Hookey L; Tessier G; Demetter P; Nagy N; Stellke A; De Maertelaer V; Devière J; Le Moine O
Endoscopy; 2009 Aug; 41(8):696-701. PubMed ID: 19618343
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Brush cytology of ductal strictures during ERCP.
Macken E; Drijkoningen M; Van Aken E; Van Steenbergen W
Acta Gastroenterol Belg; 2000; 63(3):254-9. PubMed ID: 11189981
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Routine brush cytology and fluorescence in situ hybridization for assessment of pancreatobiliary strictures.
Smoczynski M; Jablonska A; Matyskiel A; Lakomy J; Dubowik M; Marek I; Biernat W; Limon J
Gastrointest Endosc; 2012 Jan; 75(1):65-73. PubMed ID: 22078103
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Benign, dysplastic, or malignant--making sense of endoscopic bile duct brush cytology: results in 149 consecutive patients.
Lee JG; Leung JW; Baillie J; Layfield LJ; Cotton PB
Am J Gastroenterol; 1995 May; 90(5):722-6. PubMed ID: 7733076
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Interobserver reproducibility and agreement with original diagnosis in the categories "atypical" and "suspicious for malignancy" for bile and pancreatic duct brushings.
Layfield LJ; Schmidt RL; Chadwick BE; Esebua M; Witt BL
Diagn Cytopathol; 2015 Oct; 43(10):797-801. PubMed ID: 26153872
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Endoscopic transpapillary biopsy for diagnosis of patients with pancreaticobiliary ductal strictures.
Kubota Y; Takaoka M; Tani K; Ogura M; Kin H; Fujimura K; Mizuno T; Inoue K
Am J Gastroenterol; 1993 Oct; 88(10):1700-4. PubMed ID: 8213710
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Biliary brush cytology in the assessment of biliary strictures at a tertiary center in Iran.
Mohammad Alizadeh AH; Mousavi M; Salehi B; Molaei M; Khodadoostan M; Afzali ES; Dadvar Z; Mirsattari D; Aghdaei HA; Lahmi F; Zali MR
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2011; 12(10):2793-6. PubMed ID: 22320994
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
