These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

117 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1663951)

  • 1. Dental implant materials. I. Some effects of preparative procedures on surface topography.
    Smith DC; Pilliar RM; Chernecky R
    J Biomed Mater Res; 1991 Sep; 25(9):1045-68. PubMed ID: 1663951
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Dental implant materials. II. Preparative procedures and surface spectroscopic studies.
    Smith DC; Pilliar RM; Metson JB; McIntyre NS
    J Biomed Mater Res; 1991 Sep; 25(9):1069-84. PubMed ID: 1663952
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Surface characteristics of electrochemically oxidized implants and acid-etched implants: surface chemistry, morphology, pore configurations, oxide thickness, crystal structure, and roughness.
    Sul YT; Byon E; Wennerberg A
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2008; 23(4):631-40. PubMed ID: 18807558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Implant surface alterations from a nonmetallic ultrasonic tip.
    Bailey GM; Gardner JS; Day MH; Kovanda BJ
    J West Soc Periodontol Periodontal Abstr; 1998; 46(3):69-73. PubMed ID: 10597152
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effects of the Nd:YAG dental laser on plasma-sprayed and hydroxyapatite-coated titanium dental implants: surface alteration and attempted sterilization.
    Block CM; Mayo JA; Evans GH
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1992; 7(4):441-9. PubMed ID: 1299639
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Surface characterization of three titanium dental implants.
    Fandridis J; Papadopoulos T
    Implant Dent; 2008 Mar; 17(1):91-9. PubMed ID: 18332762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Adsorption of human plasma proteins to modified titanium surfaces.
    Sela MN; Badihi L; Rosen G; Steinberg D; Kohavi D
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2007 Oct; 18(5):630-8. PubMed ID: 17484735
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Surface characterizations of variously treated titanium materials.
    Lim YJ; Oshida Y; Andres CJ; Barco MT
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2001; 16(3):333-42. PubMed ID: 11432653
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A histomorphometric analysis of the effects of various surface treatment methods on osseointegration.
    Kim YH; Koak JY; Chang IT; Wennerberg A; Heo SJ
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2003; 18(3):349-56. PubMed ID: 12814309
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Influence of the height of the external hexagon and surface treatment on fatigue life of commercially pure titanium dental implants.
    Gil FJ; Aparicio C; Manero JM; Padros A
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009; 24(4):583-90. PubMed ID: 19885397
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Surface analysis of machined versus sandblasted and acid-etched titanium implants.
    Orsini G; Assenza B; Scarano A; Piattelli M; Piattelli A
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2000; 15(6):779-84. PubMed ID: 11151575
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Do implant surfaces make a difference?
    Meffert RM
    Curr Opin Periodontol; 1997; 4():104-8. PubMed ID: 9655029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Profilometric and standard error of the mean analysis of rough implant surfaces treated with different instrumentations.
    Ramaglia L; di Lauro AE; Morgese F; Squillace A
    Implant Dent; 2006 Mar; 15(1):77-82. PubMed ID: 16569965
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Characterization of the surface properties of commercially available dental implants using scanning electron microscopy, focused ion beam, and high-resolution transmission electron microscopy.
    Jarmar T; Palmquist A; Brånemark R; Hermansson L; Engqvist H; Thomsen P
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2008 Mar; 10(1):11-22. PubMed ID: 18254738
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Observation of topography and analysis of surface contamination of titanium implant after roughness treatment].
    Cao H; Yang X; Wu D; Zhang X
    Sheng Wu Yi Xue Gong Cheng Xue Za Zhi; 2007 Apr; 24(2):372-5. PubMed ID: 17591263
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Histomorphometric and fluorescence microscopic evaluation of interfacial bone healing around 3 different dental implants before and after radiation therapy.
    Weinlaender M; Beumer J; Kenney EB; Lekovic V; Holmes R; Moy PK; Plenk H
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2006; 21(2):212-24. PubMed ID: 16634491
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Direct assessment of profilometric roughness variability from typical implant surface types.
    Kohles SS; Clark MB; Brown CA; Kenealy JN
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2004; 19(4):510-6. PubMed ID: 15346747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Adherence of Streptococcus mutans to implant materials.
    Fujioka-Hirai Y; Akagawa Y; Minagi S; Tsuru H; Miyake Y; Suginaka H
    J Biomed Mater Res; 1987 Jul; 21(7):913-20. PubMed ID: 3038919
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Spark plasma sintering synthesis of porous nanocrystalline titanium alloys for biomedical applications.
    Nicula R; Lüthen F; Stir M; Nebe B; Burkel E
    Biomol Eng; 2007 Nov; 24(5):564-7. PubMed ID: 17869173
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Surface characterization of titanium-based implant materials.
    Placko HE; Mishra S; Weimer JJ; Lucas LC
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2000; 15(3):355-63. PubMed ID: 10874800
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.