These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

84 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1663952)

  • 1. Dental implant materials. II. Preparative procedures and surface spectroscopic studies.
    Smith DC; Pilliar RM; Metson JB; McIntyre NS
    J Biomed Mater Res; 1991 Sep; 25(9):1069-84. PubMed ID: 1663952
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Dental implant materials. I. Some effects of preparative procedures on surface topography.
    Smith DC; Pilliar RM; Chernecky R
    J Biomed Mater Res; 1991 Sep; 25(9):1045-68. PubMed ID: 1663951
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Dental implants: materials and design considerations.
    Smith DC
    Int J Prosthodont; 1993; 6(2):106-17. PubMed ID: 8329086
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Do implant surfaces make a difference?
    Meffert RM
    Curr Opin Periodontol; 1997; 4():104-8. PubMed ID: 9655029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. In vivo plaque formation on implant materials.
    Nakazato G; Tsuchiya H; Sato M; Yamauchi M
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1989; 4(4):321-6. PubMed ID: 2561743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Quantitative histomorphometric description of implant anchorage for three types of dental implants following 3 months of healing in baboons.
    Carr AB; Gerard DA; Larsen PE
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1997; 12(6):777-84. PubMed ID: 9425758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Adherence of Streptococcus mutans to implant materials.
    Fujioka-Hirai Y; Akagawa Y; Minagi S; Tsuru H; Miyake Y; Suginaka H
    J Biomed Mater Res; 1987 Jul; 21(7):913-20. PubMed ID: 3038919
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Interfacial kinetics of titanium- and cobalt-based implant alloys in human serum: metal release and biofilm formation.
    Hallab NJ; Skipor A; Jacobs JJ
    J Biomed Mater Res A; 2003 Jun; 65(3):311-8. PubMed ID: 12746877
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Characterization of the surface properties of commercially available dental implants using scanning electron microscopy, focused ion beam, and high-resolution transmission electron microscopy.
    Jarmar T; Palmquist A; Brånemark R; Hermansson L; Engqvist H; Thomsen P
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2008 Mar; 10(1):11-22. PubMed ID: 18254738
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Biological performance of chemical hydroxyapatite coating associated with implant surface modification by laser beam: biomechanical study in rabbit tibias.
    Faeda RS; Tavares HS; Sartori R; Guastaldi AC; Marcantonio E
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2009 Aug; 67(8):1706-15. PubMed ID: 19615586
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Semiconductive properties of passivated titanium and titanium based hard coatings on metals for implants--an experimental approach.
    Thull R
    Med Prog Technol; 1990; 16(4):225-34. PubMed ID: 2151668
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A histomorphometric analysis of the effects of various surface treatment methods on osseointegration.
    Kim YH; Koak JY; Chang IT; Wennerberg A; Heo SJ
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2003; 18(3):349-56. PubMed ID: 12814309
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Dental implants: materials and design.
    Pilliar RM
    J Can Dent Assoc; 1990 Sep; 56(9):857-61. PubMed ID: 2171736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Biomechanical and histomorphometric comparison between zirconia implants with varying surface textures and a titanium implant in the maxilla of miniature pigs.
    Gahlert M; Gudehus T; Eichhorn S; Steinhauser E; Kniha H; Erhardt W
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2007 Oct; 18(5):662-8. PubMed ID: 17608736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Titanium release from implants prepared with different surface roughness.
    Wennerberg A; Ide-Ektessabi A; Hatkamata S; Sawase T; Johansson C; Albrektsson T; Martinelli A; Södervall U; Odelius H
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2004 Oct; 15(5):505-12. PubMed ID: 15355391
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [SIMS (secondary ion mass spectroscopy) and XPS (x-ray photoelectron spectroscopy) study of titanium implant surfaces coated with anodic titanium-oxide layer].
    Suba C; Velich N; Vida G; Kovács L; Kiss G; Szabó G
    Fogorv Sz; 2003 Oct; 96(5):197-203. PubMed ID: 14635492
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Implant surface alterations from a nonmetallic ultrasonic tip.
    Bailey GM; Gardner JS; Day MH; Kovanda BJ
    J West Soc Periodontol Periodontal Abstr; 1998; 46(3):69-73. PubMed ID: 10597152
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Surface physics methods and in vitro bone-biomaterial interface control.
    Muster D; Humbert P; Mosser A
    Biomaterials; 1990 Jul; 11():57-62. PubMed ID: 2168765
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Profilometric and standard error of the mean analysis of rough implant surfaces treated with different instrumentations.
    Ramaglia L; di Lauro AE; Morgese F; Squillace A
    Implant Dent; 2006 Mar; 15(1):77-82. PubMed ID: 16569965
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Use of x-ray photoelectron spectroscopy and cyclic polarization to evaluate the corrosion behavior of six nickel-chromium alloys before and after porcelain-fused-to-metal firing.
    Roach MD; Wolan JT; Parsell DE; Bumgardner JD
    J Prosthet Dent; 2000 Dec; 84(6):623-34. PubMed ID: 11125349
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.