These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

117 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16639678)

  • 1. Impact of pressure recovery in the evaluation of the Omnicarbon tilting disc valve.
    Dohmen G; Schmitz C; Langebartels G; Steinseifer U; Schmitz-Rode T; Autschbach R
    Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2006 Apr; 54(3):173-7. PubMed ID: 16639678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Assessment of effective orifice area of prosthetic aortic valves with Doppler echocardiography: an in vivo and in vitro study.
    Bech-Hanssen O; Caidahl K; Wallentin I; Ask P; Wranne B
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2001 Aug; 122(2):287-95. PubMed ID: 11479501
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Hemodynamics of high-performance bileaflet valves: comparison to simulated clinical Doppler measurements.
    Dohmen G; Schmitz C; Schmitz-Rode T; Steinseifer U; Autschbach R
    J Heart Valve Dis; 2006 Jul; 15(4):549-56. PubMed ID: 16901053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Aortic prosthetic valve design and size: relation to Doppler echocardiographic findings and pressure recovery- an in vitro study.
    Bech-Hanssen O; Caidahl K; Wallentin I; Brandberg J; Wranne B; Ask P
    J Am Soc Echocardiogr; 2000 Jan; 13(1):39-50. PubMed ID: 10625830
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Doppler assessment of mechanical aortic valve prostheses: effect of valve design and size of the aorta.
    Mascherbauer J; Schima H; Maurer G; Baumgartner H
    J Heart Valve Dis; 2004 Sep; 13(5):823-30. PubMed ID: 15473486
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Net pressure gradients in aortic prosthetic valves can be estimated by Doppler.
    Bech-Hanssen O; Gjertsson P; Houltz E; Wranne B; Ask P; Loyd D; Caidahl K
    J Am Soc Echocardiogr; 2003 Aug; 16(8):858-66. PubMed ID: 12878995
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Omnicarbon 21 mm aortic valve prosthesis: in vitro hydrodynamic and echo-Doppler study.
    Dumont K; Segers R; Vandenberghe S; Van Nooten G; Verdonck P
    Int J Artif Organs; 2002 Aug; 25(8):783-90. PubMed ID: 12296463
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Impact of patient-prosthesis mismatch and aortic valve design on coronary flow reserve after aortic valve replacement.
    Bakhtiary F; Schiemann M; Dzemali O; Dogan S; Schächinger V; Ackermann H; Moritz A; Kleine P
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 2007 Feb; 49(7):790-6. PubMed ID: 17306709
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Pressure recovery in bileaflet heart valve prostheses. Localized high velocities and gradients in central and side orifices with implications for Doppler-catheter gradient relation in aortic and mitral position.
    Vandervoort PM; Greenberg NL; Powell KA; Cosgrove DM; Thomas JD
    Circulation; 1995 Dec; 92(12):3464-72. PubMed ID: 8521568
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The hemodynamic performance of standard bileaflet valves is impaired by a tilted implantation position.
    Hartrumpf M; Albes JM; Krempl T; Rudolph V; Wahlers T
    Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2003 Mar; 23(3):283-91. PubMed ID: 12614795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Limitation of Doppler echocardiography in evaluation of aortic valve prostheses]].
    Geibel A; Kasper W; Fraedrich G; Konstantinides S; Schöllhorn J; Tiede N; Just H
    Z Kardiol; 1993 Mar; 82(3):175-80. PubMed ID: 8475654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Influence of aortic dimensions on the hemodynamic performance of small aortic valve prostheses: impact on patient/prosthesis mismatch.
    Dohmen G; Schmitz C; Steinseifer U; Hatam N; Hilgers RD; Autschbach R; Spillner J
    Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2011 Dec; 59(8):449-53. PubMed ID: 21544789
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The Omnicarbon tilting-disc heart valve prosthesis. A clinical and Doppler echocardiographic follow-up.
    Peter M; Weiss P; Jenzer HR; Hoffmann A; Dubach P; Roth J; Bertschmann W; Stulz P; Grädel E; Burckhardt D
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1993 Oct; 106(4):599-608. PubMed ID: 8412252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. In vitro assessment of prosthesis type and pressure recovery characteristics: Doppler echocardiography overestimation of bileaflet mechanical and bioprosthetic aortic valve gradients.
    Bach DS; Schmitz C; Dohmen G; Aaronson KD; Steinseifer U; Kleine P
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2012 Aug; 144(2):453-8. PubMed ID: 22264413
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Transcranial Doppler ultrasound signals associated with prosthetic heart valves: an in vitro study.
    Mackay TG; Georgiadis D; Grosset DG; Kelman AW; Lees KR; Wheatley DJ
    J Heart Valve Dis; 1995 Jul; 4(4):414-9. PubMed ID: 7582153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Potential role of Reynolds number in resolving Doppler- and catheter-based transvalvular gradient discrepancies in aortic stenosis.
    Adams JC; Jiamsripong P; Belohlavek M; McMahon EM; Marupakula V; Heys J; Chaliki HP
    J Heart Valve Dis; 2011 Mar; 20(2):159-64. PubMed ID: 21560814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Doppler hemodynamic characteristics of four widely used aortic valve prostheses.
    Masotti C; De Castro C; Aquilina M; Bonfranceschi P; Rusticali F
    Minerva Cardioangiol; 1990 Nov; 38(11):461-71. PubMed ID: 2093848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Doppler-catheter discrepancies in patients with bileaflet mechanical prostheses or bioprostheses in the aortic valve position.
    Aljassim O; Svensson G; Houltz E; Bech-Hanssen O
    Am J Cardiol; 2008 Nov; 102(10):1383-9. PubMed ID: 18993160
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Cinefluoroscopic assessment of mechanical disc prostheses: its value as a complementary method to echocardiography.
    Cianciulli TE; Lax JA; Beck MA; Cerruti FE; Gigena GE; Saccheri MC; Fernández E; Dorelle AN; Leguizamón JH; Prezioso HA
    J Heart Valve Dis; 2005 Sep; 14(5):664-73. PubMed ID: 16245506
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. In vitro pressure drop comparison between two mechanical valve prostheses.
    Kim SH; Chang BC; Cho BK
    Yonsei Med J; 1994 Mar; 35(1):72-6. PubMed ID: 8009899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.