These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

125 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16640317)

  • 1. Using mathematical models to assess sediment stability.
    Ziegler CK
    Integr Environ Assess Manag; 2006 Jan; 2(1):44-50. PubMed ID: 16640317
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Incorporating sediment stability within the management of contaminated sediment sites: a synthesis approach.
    Bohlen WF; Erickson MJ
    Integr Environ Assess Manag; 2006 Jan; 2(1):24-8. PubMed ID: 16640313
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Uncertainty in experimental techniques for measuring sediment erodability.
    Jepsen RA
    Integr Environ Assess Manag; 2006 Jan; 2(1):39-43. PubMed ID: 16640316
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Examination of the uncertainty in contaminant fate and transport modeling: a case study in the Venice Lagoon.
    Sommerfreund J; Arhonditsis GB; Diamond ML; Frignani M; Capodaglio G; Gerino M; Bellucci L; Giuliani S; Mugnai C
    Ecotoxicol Environ Saf; 2010 Mar; 73(3):231-9. PubMed ID: 19493571
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. TREX: spatially distributed model to assess watershed contaminant transport and fate.
    Velleux ML; England JF; Julien PY
    Sci Total Environ; 2008 Oct; 404(1):113-28. PubMed ID: 18649925
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Modeling sediment impact on the transport of fecal bacteria.
    Bai S; Lung WS
    Water Res; 2005 Dec; 39(20):5232-40. PubMed ID: 16307774
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Development and evaluation of a mathematical model for the study of sediment-related water quality issues.
    Zeng W; Beck MB
    Water Sci Technol; 2001; 43(7):47-54. PubMed ID: 11385874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A model for contaminant mass flux in capped sediment under consolidation.
    Alshawabkeh AN; Rahbar N; Sheahan T
    J Contam Hydrol; 2005 Jul; 78(3):147-65. PubMed ID: 16005541
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Transport and deposition of sediment-associated Escherichia coli in natural streams.
    Jamieson R; Joy DM; Lee H; Kostaschuk R; Gordon R
    Water Res; 2005 Jul; 39(12):2665-75. PubMed ID: 15979685
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Review of thin-layer placement applications to enhance natural recovery of contaminated sediment.
    Merritt KA; Conder J; Kirtay V; Chadwick DB; Magar V
    Integr Environ Assess Manag; 2010 Oct; 6(4):749-60. PubMed ID: 20872653
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Decision support system for optimal reservoir operation modeling within sediment deposition control.
    Hadihardaja IK
    Water Sci Technol; 2009; 59(3):479-89. PubMed ID: 19214002
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Environmental modelling in the Gulf of Cadiz: heavy metal distributions in water and sediments.
    Periáñez R
    Sci Total Environ; 2009 May; 407(10):3392-406. PubMed ID: 19246075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Modeling flow and sediment transport in a river system using an artificial neural network.
    Yitian L; Gu RR
    Environ Manage; 2003 Jan; 31(1):122-34. PubMed ID: 12447580
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The reliability of sediment transport predictions in sewers: influence of hydraulic and morphological uncertainties.
    Banasiak R; Tait S
    Water Sci Technol; 2008; 57(9):1317-27. PubMed ID: 18495994
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Separating the wheat from the chaff: the effective use of mathematical models as decision tools.
    Glaser D; Bridges TS
    Integr Environ Assess Manag; 2007 Jul; 3(3):442-9. PubMed ID: 17695115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Uncertainties in sediment erodibility estimates due to a lack of standards for experimental protocols and data interpretation.
    Sanford LP
    Integr Environ Assess Manag; 2006 Jan; 2(1):29-34. PubMed ID: 16640314
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Daily suspended sediment concentration simulation using ANN and neuro-fuzzy models.
    Rajaee T; Mirbagheri SA; Zounemat-Kermani M; Nourani V
    Sci Total Environ; 2009 Aug; 407(17):4916-27. PubMed ID: 19520419
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Risk assessment of contaminated sediments in river basins--theoretical considerations and pragmatic approach.
    Heise S; Förstner U
    J Environ Monit; 2007 Sep; 9(9):943-52. PubMed ID: 17726554
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Development and application of a GIS-based sediment budget model.
    Ramos-Scharrón CE; Macdonald LH
    J Environ Manage; 2007 Jul; 84(2):157-72. PubMed ID: 17029758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The sediment quality guideline, ERL, is not a chemical concentration at the threshold of sediment toxicity.
    O'Connor TP
    Mar Pollut Bull; 2004 Sep; 49(5-6):383-5. PubMed ID: 15325205
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.