218 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16640319)
1. Importance of implementation and residual risk analyses in sediment remediation.
Wenning RJ; Sorensen M; Magar VS
Integr Environ Assess Manag; 2006 Jan; 2(1):59-65. PubMed ID: 16640319
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Panel discussion: remedy effectiveness: what works, what doesn't?
Zeller C; Cushing B
Integr Environ Assess Manag; 2006 Jan; 2(1):75-9. PubMed ID: 16640321
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Risk-based decision making to manage contaminated sediments.
Bridges TS; Apitz SE; Evison L; Keckler K; Logan M; Nadeau S; Wenning RJ
Integr Environ Assess Manag; 2006 Jan; 2(1):51-8. PubMed ID: 16640318
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The role of monitored natural recovery in sediment remediation.
Magar VS; Wenning RJ
Integr Environ Assess Manag; 2006 Jan; 2(1):66-74. PubMed ID: 16640320
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Incorporating sediment stability within the management of contaminated sediment sites: a synthesis approach.
Bohlen WF; Erickson MJ
Integr Environ Assess Manag; 2006 Jan; 2(1):24-8. PubMed ID: 16640313
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Evaluation of factors affecting stakeholder risk perception of contaminated sediment disposal in Oslo harbor.
Sparrevik M; Ellen GJ; Duijn M
Environ Sci Technol; 2011 Jan; 45(1):118-24. PubMed ID: 20809566
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Contaminated Department of Energy facilities and ecosystems: weighing the ecological risks.
Burger J
J Toxicol Environ Health A; 2000 Sep; 61(2):141-54. PubMed ID: 11032427
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Applicability of risk-based management and the need for risk-based economic decision analysis at hazardous waste contaminated sites.
Khadam I; Kaluarachchi JJ
Environ Int; 2003 Jul; 29(4):503-19. PubMed ID: 12705948
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Accelerating progress at contaminated sediment sites: moving from guidance to practice.
Bridges TS; Nadeau SC; McCulloch MC
Integr Environ Assess Manag; 2012 Apr; 8(2):331-8. PubMed ID: 22083866
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Review of thin-layer placement applications to enhance natural recovery of contaminated sediment.
Merritt KA; Conder J; Kirtay V; Chadwick DB; Magar V
Integr Environ Assess Manag; 2010 Oct; 6(4):749-60. PubMed ID: 20872653
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Human ecology and interdisciplinary cooperation for primary prevention of environmental risk factors for public health].
Dobrowolski JW
Przegl Lek; 2007; 64 Suppl 4():35-41. PubMed ID: 18540323
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Use of stochastic multi-criteria decision analysis to support sustainable management of contaminated sediments.
Sparrevik M; Barton DN; Bates ME; Linkov I
Environ Sci Technol; 2012 Feb; 46(3):1326-34. PubMed ID: 22191941
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Dredging processes and remedy effectiveness: Relationship to the 4 Rs of environmental dredging.
Bridges TS; Gustavson KE; Schroeder P; Ells SJ; Hayes D; Nadeau SC; Palermo MR; Patmont C
Integr Environ Assess Manag; 2010 Oct; 6(4):619-30. PubMed ID: 20872643
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Analysis of environmental effects of the use of stabilized dredged material from New York/New Jersey Harbor, USA, for construction of roadway embankments.
Douglas WS; Maher A; Jafari F
Integr Environ Assess Manag; 2005 Nov; 1(4):355-64. PubMed ID: 16639902
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Shifting priorities at the Department of Energy's bomb factories: protecting human and ecological health.
Burger J; Leschine TM; Greenberg M; Karr JR; Gochfeld M; Powers CW
Environ Manage; 2003 Feb; 31(2):157-67. PubMed ID: 12520373
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Impacts of landscape remediation on the heavy metal pollution dynamics of a lake surrounded by non-ferrous smelter waste.
Blake WH; Walsh RP; Reed JM; Barnsley MJ; Smith J
Environ Pollut; 2007 Jul; 148(1):268-80. PubMed ID: 17276566
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Prioritization of sediment management alternatives using stochastic multicriteria acceptability analysis.
Alvarez-Guerra M; Canis L; Voulvoulis N; Viguri JR; Linkov I
Sci Total Environ; 2010 Sep; 408(20):4354-67. PubMed ID: 20673964
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The role of risk and future land use in cleanup decisions at the Department Of Energy.
Burger J; Powers C; Greenberg M; Gochfeld M
Risk Anal; 2004 Dec; 24(6):1539-49. PubMed ID: 15660610
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Fostering innovation in contaminated sediments management through multicriteria technology assessment and public participation.
Seager TP; Lambert JH; Gardner KH
Risk Anal; 2007 Aug; 27(4):1043-52. PubMed ID: 17958510
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Why confined aquatic disposal cells often make sense.
Fredette TJ
Integr Environ Assess Manag; 2006 Jan; 2(1):35-8. PubMed ID: 16640315
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
