These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

278 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16642434)

  • 1. Efficient study designs for test of genetic association using sibship data and unrelated cases and controls.
    Li M; Boehnke M; Abecasis GR
    Am J Hum Genet; 2006 May; 78(5):778-792. PubMed ID: 16642434
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Joint modeling of linkage and association: identifying SNPs responsible for a linkage signal.
    Li M; Boehnke M; Abecasis GR
    Am J Hum Genet; 2005 Jun; 76(6):934-49. PubMed ID: 15877278
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Detection of disease genes by use of family data. I. Likelihood-based theory.
    Whittemore AS; Tu IP
    Am J Hum Genet; 2000 Apr; 66(4):1328-40. PubMed ID: 10739758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The relative power of family-based and case-control designs for linkage disequilibrium studies of complex human diseases I. DNA pooling.
    Risch N; Teng J
    Genome Res; 1998 Dec; 8(12):1273-88. PubMed ID: 9872982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Linkage analysis in the presence of errors IV: joint pseudomarker analysis of linkage and/or linkage disequilibrium on a mixture of pedigrees and singletons when the mode of inheritance cannot be accurately specified.
    Göring HH; Terwilliger JD
    Am J Hum Genet; 2000 Apr; 66(4):1310-27. PubMed ID: 10731466
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Design considerations for genetic linkage and association studies.
    Nsengimana J; Bishop DT
    Methods Mol Biol; 2012; 850():237-62. PubMed ID: 22307702
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Two-Stage sampling designs for gene association studies.
    Thomas D; Xie R; Gebregziabher M
    Genet Epidemiol; 2004 Dec; 27(4):401-14. PubMed ID: 15543639
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Selection of the most informative individuals from families with multiple siblings for association studies.
    Liu C; Yang Q; Adrienne Cupples L; Meigs JB; Dupuis J
    Genet Epidemiol; 2009 May; 33(4):299-307. PubMed ID: 19025786
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Powerful designs for genetic association studies that consider twins and sibling pairs with discordant genotypes.
    Wessel J; Schork AJ; Tiwari HK; Schork NJ
    Genet Epidemiol; 2007 Nov; 31(7):789-96. PubMed ID: 17549743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Sibship T2 association tests of complex diseases for tightly linked markers.
    Fan R; Knapp M
    Hum Genomics; 2005 Jun; 2(2):90-112. PubMed ID: 16004725
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Design Considerations for Genetic Linkage and Association Studies.
    Nsengimana J; Bishop DT
    Methods Mol Biol; 2017; 1666():257-281. PubMed ID: 28980250
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Accounting for linkage in family-based tests of association with missing parental genotypes.
    Martin ER; Bass MP; Hauser ER; Kaplan NL
    Am J Hum Genet; 2003 Nov; 73(5):1016-26. PubMed ID: 14551902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Evidence for a novel rheumatoid arthritis susceptibility locus on chromosome 6p.
    Brintnell W; Zeggini E; Barton A; Thomson W; Eyre S; Hinks A; Silman AJ; Worthington J
    Arthritis Rheum; 2004 Dec; 50(12):3823-30. PubMed ID: 15593216
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A discordant-sibship test for disequilibrium and linkage: no need for parental data.
    Horvath S; Laird NM
    Am J Hum Genet; 1998 Dec; 63(6):1886-97. PubMed ID: 9837840
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Design considerations in a sib-pair study of linkage for susceptibility loci in cancer.
    Kerber RA; Amos CI; Yeap BY; Finkelstein DM; Thomas DC
    BMC Med Genet; 2008 Jul; 9():64. PubMed ID: 18616822
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The affected-/discordant-sib-pair design can guarantee validity of multipoint model-free linkage analysis of incomplete pedigrees when there is marker-marker disequilibrium.
    Xing C; Sinha R; Xing G; Lu Q; Elston RC
    Am J Hum Genet; 2006 Aug; 79(2):396-401. PubMed ID: 16826532
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [How about the uncertainty in the haplotypes in the population-based KORA studies?].
    Heid IM; Lamina C; Bongardt F; Fischer G; Klopp N; Huth C; Küchenhoff H; Kronenberg F; Wichmann HE; Illig T
    Gesundheitswesen; 2005 Aug; 67 Suppl 1():S132-6. PubMed ID: 16032531
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Informative-transmission disequilibrium test (i-TDT): combined linkage and association mapping that includes unaffected offspring as well as affected offspring.
    Guo CY; Lunetta KL; DeStefano AL; Ordovas JM; Cupples LA
    Genet Epidemiol; 2007 Feb; 31(2):115-33. PubMed ID: 17123304
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Testing association and linkage using affected-sib-parent study designs.
    Millstein J; Siegmund KD; Conti DV; Gauderman WJ
    Genet Epidemiol; 2005 Nov; 29(3):225-33. PubMed ID: 16121357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Mixed-effects logistic approach for association following linkage scan for complex disorders.
    Xu H; Shete S
    Ann Hum Genet; 2007 Mar; 71(Pt 2):230-7. PubMed ID: 17032287
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.