These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

197 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16642674)

  • 1. How state medical marijuana laws affect workplace drug testing.
    Kenney JE
    Occup Health Saf; 2006 Apr; 75(4):26, 28, 31. PubMed ID: 16642674
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Procedures for transportation workplace drug and alcohol testing programs: state laws requiring drug and alcohol rule violation information. Interim final rule.
    Office of the Secretary, DOT
    Fed Regist; 2008 Jun; 73(115):33735-7. PubMed ID: 18677825
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. State medical marijuana laws: understanding the laws and their limitations.
    Pacula RL; Chriqui JF; Reichmann DA; Terry-McElrath YM
    J Public Health Policy; 2002; 23(4):413-39. PubMed ID: 12532682
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Alabama laws on drug testing in the work place.
    Morgan WR; Summer GL
    Ala Med; 1995 Nov-1996 Jan; 65(5-7):45-8. PubMed ID: 8607383
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The U.S. Mandatory Guidelines for Federal Workplace Drug Testing Programs: current status and future considerations.
    Bush DM
    Forensic Sci Int; 2008 Jan; 174(2-3):111-9. PubMed ID: 17434274
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The legal status of medical marijuana.
    Seamon MJ
    Ann Pharmacother; 2006 Dec; 40(12):2211-5. PubMed ID: 17062830
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Workplace drug testing.
    Shepardson C
    Ohio Nurses Rev; 2002 Apr; 77(4):7-8. PubMed ID: 15133871
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Marijuana in the workplace: guidance for occupational health professionals and employers: Joint Guidance Statement of the American Association of Occupational Health Nurses and the American College of Occupational and Environmental Medicine.
    Phillips JA; Holland MG; Baldwin DD; Meuleveld LG; Mueller KL; Perkison B; Upfal M; Dreger M
    J Occup Environ Med; 2015 Apr; 57(4):459-75. PubMed ID: 25851187
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Control of alcohol and drug use: changes to conform to new DOT transportation workplace testing procedures. Final rule.
    Federal Railroad Administration (FRA), Department of Transportation (DOT or Department)
    Fed Regist; 2001 Aug; 66(154):41969-96. PubMed ID: 11757556
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Medical marijuana. Oregon could allow firing of medical users.
    AIDS Policy Law; 2007 Apr; 22(7):1. PubMed ID: 17489125
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Procedures for transportation workplace drug and alcohol testing programs; technical amendments. Final rule.
    Office of the Secretary, DOT
    Fed Regist; 2001 Aug; 66(154):41944-55. PubMed ID: 11794308
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The subversion of urine drug testing.
    Berge KH; Bush DM
    Minn Med; 2010 Aug; 93(8):45-7. PubMed ID: 20862879
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Drug testing programs in government agencies and private workplaces. The legal challenge continues.
    Snyder JW; Klees JE
    Occup Med; 1996; 11(1):87-100. PubMed ID: 8907054
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Drug testing in the workplace: an update.
    Hosp Secur Saf Manage; 1989 Oct; 10(6):5-11. PubMed ID: 10296530
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Legal issues facing physicians: substance abuse in the workplace.
    Clark HW; Johnson B
    Occup Med; 2002; 17(1):119-35, v. PubMed ID: 11726341
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Courts settle difficult questions regarding workplace drug testing.
    Porro J
    Occup Health Saf; 1989 Nov; 58(12):48, 50. PubMed ID: 2594303
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Strong drug testing policies uphold workplace standards.
    Rodriguez J
    Provider; 1993 Feb; 19(2):31-2. PubMed ID: 10123884
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Reducing cannabis-impaired driving: is there sufficient evidence for drug testing of drivers?
    Hall W; Homel R
    Addiction; 2007 Dec; 102(12):1918-9. PubMed ID: 18031427
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Federal contractors to maintain drug-free workplace.
    Vaccaro PL; Bryant MR
    Provider; 1990 Mar; 16(3):26-7. PubMed ID: 10170523
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Present and future opportunities.
    Kenney JE
    Occup Health Saf; 2005 Aug; 74(8):84, 86. PubMed ID: 16212029
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.