These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
4. The specificity of perceptual learning in speech processing. Eisner F; McQueen JM Percept Psychophys; 2005 Feb; 67(2):224-38. PubMed ID: 15971687 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Effects of talker variability on perceptual learning of dialects. Clopper CG; Pisoni DB Lang Speech; 2004; 47(Pt 3):207-39. PubMed ID: 15697151 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Distributional learning for speech reflects cumulative exposure to a talker's phonetic distributions. Theodore RM; Monto NR Psychon Bull Rev; 2019 Jun; 26(3):985-992. PubMed ID: 30604404 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Varying acoustic-phonemic ambiguity reveals that talker normalization is obligatory in speech processing. Choi JY; Hu ER; Perrachione TK Atten Percept Psychophys; 2018 Apr; 80(3):784-797. PubMed ID: 29417449 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. On the perception of similarity among talkers. Remez RE; Fellowes JM; Nagel DS J Acoust Soc Am; 2007 Dec; 122(6):3688-96. PubMed ID: 18247776 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Talker identification based on phonetic information. Remez RE; Fellowes JM; Rubin PE J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1997 Jun; 23(3):651-66. PubMed ID: 9180039 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Listener sensitivity to individual talker differences in voice-onset-time. Allen JS; Miller JL J Acoust Soc Am; 2004 Jun; 115(6):3171-83. PubMed ID: 15237841 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Polling the effective neighborhoods of spoken words with the verbal transformation effect. Bashford JA; Warren RM; Lenz PW J Acoust Soc Am; 2006 Apr; 119(4):EL55-9. PubMed ID: 16642865 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Generalization in perceptual learning for speech. Kraljic T; Samuel AG Psychon Bull Rev; 2006 Apr; 13(2):262-8. PubMed ID: 16892992 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Talker adaptation in speech perception: adjusting the signal or the representations? Dahan D; Drucker SJ; Scarborough RA Cognition; 2008 Sep; 108(3):710-8. PubMed ID: 18653175 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Habituation to irrelevant speech: effects on a visual short-term memory task. Morris N; Jones DM Percept Psychophys; 1990 Mar; 47(3):291-7. PubMed ID: 2326151 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Talker Versus Dialect Effects on Speech Intelligibility: A Symmetrical Study. McCloy DR; Wright RA; Souza PE Lang Speech; 2015 Sep; 58(Pt 3):371-86. PubMed ID: 26529902 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The bounds on flexibility in speech perception. Sjerps MJ; McQueen JM J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2010 Feb; 36(1):195-211. PubMed ID: 20121304 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Perceptual learning for speech: Is there a return to normal? Kraljic T; Samuel AG Cogn Psychol; 2005 Sep; 51(2):141-78. PubMed ID: 16095588 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Generalization of Perceptual Learning of Degraded Speech Across Talkers. Huyck JJ; Smith RH; Hawkins S; Johnsrude IS J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2017 Nov; 60(11):3334-3341. PubMed ID: 28979990 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Effects of noise, reverberation and foreign accent on native and non-native listeners' performance of English speech comprehension. Peng ZE; Wang LM J Acoust Soc Am; 2016 May; 139(5):2772. PubMed ID: 27250170 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]