These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

142 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16642832)

  • 1. Noise annoyance and activity disturbance before and after the erection of a roadside noise barrier.
    Nilsson ME; Berglund B
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2006 Apr; 119(4):2178-88. PubMed ID: 16642832
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Evaluating roadside noise barriers using an annoyance-reduction criterion.
    Nilsson ME; Andéhn M; Leśna P
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 Dec; 124(6):3561-7. PubMed ID: 19206785
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The Norwegian Façade Insulation Study: the efficacy of façade insulation in reducing noise annoyance due to road traffic.
    Amundsen AH; Klæboe R; Aasvang GM
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Mar; 129(3):1381-9. PubMed ID: 21428502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A descriptive cross-sectional study of annoyance from low frequency noise installations in an urban environment.
    Persson Waye K; Bengtsson J; Agge A; Björkman M
    Noise Health; 2003; 5(20):35-46. PubMed ID: 14558891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A survey on exposure-response relationships for road, rail, and aircraft noise annoyance: Differences between continuous and intermittent noise.
    Brink M; Schäffer B; Vienneau D; Foraster M; Pieren R; Eze IC; Cajochen C; Probst-Hensch N; Röösli M; Wunderli JM
    Environ Int; 2019 Apr; 125():277-290. PubMed ID: 30731377
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Long-term effects of noise reduction measures on noise annoyance and sleep disturbance: the Norwegian facade insulation study.
    Amundsen AH; Klæboe R; Aasvang GM
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Jun; 133(6):3921-8. PubMed ID: 23742346
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Road traffic noise and annoyance: a quantification of the effect of quiet side exposure at dwellings.
    de Kluizenaar Y; Janssen SA; Vos H; Salomons EM; Zhou H; van den Berg F
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2013 Jun; 10(6):2258-70. PubMed ID: 23736655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Annoyance from Road Traffic, Trains, Airplanes and from Total Environmental Noise Levels.
    Ragettli MS; Goudreau S; Plante C; Perron S; Fournier M; Smargiassi A
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2015 Dec; 13(1):. PubMed ID: 26729143
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Role of community tolerance level (CTL) in predicting the prevalence of the annoyance of road and rail noise.
    Schomer P; Mestre V; Fidell S; Berry B; Gjestland T; Vallet M; Reid T
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Apr; 131(4):2772-86. PubMed ID: 22501056
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Road traffic noise annoyance in Amsterdam.
    Meijer H; Knipschild P; Sallé H
    Int Arch Occup Environ Health; 1985; 56(4):285-97. PubMed ID: 3840773
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Annoyance due to single and combined sound exposure from railway and road traffic.
    Ohrström E; Barregård L; Andersson E; Skånberg A; Svensson H; Angerheim P
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2007 Nov; 122(5):2642-52. PubMed ID: 18189556
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Annoyance and disturbance of daily activities from road traffic noise in Canada.
    Michaud DS; Keith SE; McMurchy D
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 Feb; 123(2):784-92. PubMed ID: 18247883
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The relationship between urban combined traffic noise and annoyance: an investigation in Dalian, north of China.
    Di G; Liu X; Lin Q; Zheng Y; He L
    Sci Total Environ; 2012 Aug; 432():189-94. PubMed ID: 22728964
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Investigation of the relationship between aircraft noise and community annoyance in China.
    Guoqing D; Xiaoyi L; Xiang S; Zhengguang L; Qili L
    Noise Health; 2012; 14(57):52-7. PubMed ID: 22517304
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A comparison between exposure-response relationships for wind turbine annoyance and annoyance due to other noise sources.
    Janssen SA; Vos H; Eisses AR; Pedersen E
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Dec; 130(6):3746-53. PubMed ID: 22225031
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Longitudinal surveys on effects of changes in road traffic noise-annoyance, activity disturbances, and psycho-social well-being.
    Ohrström E
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2004 Feb; 115(2):719-29. PubMed ID: 15000184
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Road-traffic noise: annoyance, risk perception, and noise sensitivity in the Finnish adult population.
    Okokon EO; Turunen AW; Ung-Lanki S; Vartiainen AK; Tiittanen P; Lanki T
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2015 May; 12(6):5712-34. PubMed ID: 26016432
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Economic value of traffic noise reduction depending on residents' annoyance level.
    Kim K; Shin J; Oh M; Jung JK
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2019 Mar; 26(7):7243-7255. PubMed ID: 30656585
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Quantification of the exposure and effects of road traffic noise in a dense Asian city: a comparison with western cities.
    Brown AL; Lam KC; van Kamp I
    Environ Health; 2015 Mar; 14():22. PubMed ID: 25889117
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Road traffic noise: annoyance, sleep disturbance, and public health implications.
    Kim M; Chang SI; Seong JC; Holt JB; Park TH; Ko JH; Croft JB
    Am J Prev Med; 2012 Oct; 43(4):353-60. PubMed ID: 22992352
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.