These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

109 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16642841)

  • 21. Temporal Fine Structure Processing, Pitch, and Speech Perception in Adult Cochlear Implant Recipients.
    Dincer D'Alessandro H; Ballantyne D; Boyle PJ; De Seta E; DeVincentiis M; Mancini P
    Ear Hear; 2018; 39(4):679-686. PubMed ID: 29194080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Does acoustic fundamental frequency information enhance cochlear implant performance?
    Mulhern L; Cullington H
    Cochlear Implants Int; 2014 Mar; 15(2):101-8. PubMed ID: 24597637
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. The pitch of electrically presented sinusoids.
    Dorman MF; Smith M; Smith L; Parkin JL
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1994 Mar; 95(3):1677-9. PubMed ID: 8176065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. What breaks a melody: perceiving F0 and intensity sequences with a cochlear implant.
    Cousineau M; Demany L; Meyer B; Pressnitzer D
    Hear Res; 2010 Oct; 269(1-2):34-41. PubMed ID: 20674733
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Cuing mechanisms in auditory signal detection.
    Hübner R; Hafter ER
    Percept Psychophys; 1995 Feb; 57(2):197-202. PubMed ID: 7885818
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Spatial Release From Masking in Simulated Cochlear Implant Users With and Without Access to Low-Frequency Acoustic Hearing.
    Williges B; Dietz M; Hohmann V; Jürgens T
    Trends Hear; 2015 Dec; 19():. PubMed ID: 26721918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Examination of spectral timbre cues and musical instrument identification in cochlear implant recipients.
    Meister H; Landwehr M; Lang-Roth R; Streicher B; Walger M
    Cochlear Implants Int; 2014 Mar; 15(2):78-86. PubMed ID: 24597635
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Vowel identification by cochlear implant users: contributions of static and dynamic spectral cues.
    Donaldson GS; Rogers CL; Cardenas ES; Russell BA; Hanna NH
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Oct; 134(4):3021-8. PubMed ID: 24116437
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Discrimination of intonation contours by adolescents with cochlear implants.
    Holt CM; McDermott HJ
    Int J Audiol; 2013 Dec; 52(12):808-15. PubMed ID: 24053225
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Multimodal and Spectral Degradation Effects on Speech and Emotion Recognition in Adult Listeners.
    Ritter C; Vongpaisal T
    Trends Hear; 2018; 22():2331216518804966. PubMed ID: 30378469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Word Recognition Variability With Cochlear Implants: "Perceptual Attention" Versus "Auditory Sensitivity".
    Moberly AC; Lowenstein JH; Nittrouer S
    Ear Hear; 2016; 37(1):14-26. PubMed ID: 26301844
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Loudness Contour Can Influence Mandarin Tone Recognition: Vocoder Simulation and Cochlear Implants.
    Meng Q; Zheng N; Li X
    IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng; 2017 Jun; 25(6):641-649. PubMed ID: 27448366
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Factors limiting vocal-tract length discrimination in cochlear implant simulations.
    Gaudrain E; Başkent D
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2015 Mar; 137(3):1298-308. PubMed ID: 25786943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Effects of envelope-vocoder processing on F0 discrimination and concurrent-vowel identification.
    Qin MK; Oxenham AJ
    Ear Hear; 2005 Oct; 26(5):451-60. PubMed ID: 16230895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Correlations Between Pitch and Phoneme Perception in Cochlear Implant Users and Their Normal Hearing Peers.
    Goldsworthy RL
    J Assoc Res Otolaryngol; 2015 Dec; 16(6):797-809. PubMed ID: 26373936
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Experience with a second language affects the use of fundamental frequency in speech segmentation.
    Tremblay A; Namjoshi J; Spinelli E; Broersma M; Cho T; Kim S; Martínez-García MT; Connell K
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(7):e0181709. PubMed ID: 28738093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Relative contributions of temporal and place pitch cues to fundamental frequency discrimination in cochlear implantees.
    Laneau J; Wouters J; Moonen M
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2004 Dec; 116(6):3606-19. PubMed ID: 15658711
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Adjustments of the amplitude mapping function: Sensitivity of cochlear implant users and effects on subjective preference and speech recognition.
    Theelen-van den Hoek FL; Boymans M; van Dijk B; Dreschler WA
    Int J Audiol; 2016 Nov; 55(11):674-87. PubMed ID: 27447758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. The role of spectral and temporal cues in voice gender discrimination by normal-hearing listeners and cochlear implant users.
    Fu QJ; Chinchilla S; Galvin JJ
    J Assoc Res Otolaryngol; 2004 Sep; 5(3):253-60. PubMed ID: 15492884
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Human Frequency Following Responses to Vocoded Speech.
    Ananthakrishnan S; Luo X; Krishnan A
    Ear Hear; 2017; 38(5):e256-e267. PubMed ID: 28362674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.