These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

212 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16642849)

  • 21. A temporal predictive code for voice motor control: Evidence from ERP and behavioral responses to pitch-shifted auditory feedback.
    Behroozmand R; Sangtian S; Korzyukov O; Larson CR
    Brain Res; 2016 Apr; 1636():1-12. PubMed ID: 26835556
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. The Effect of Pitch and Loudness Auditory Feedback Perturbations on Vocal Quality During Sustained Phonation.
    Schenck A; Hilger AI; Levant S; Kim JH; Lester-Smith RA; Larson C
    J Voice; 2023 Jan; 37(1):37-47. PubMed ID: 33191054
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Audio-vocal system regulation in children with autism spectrum disorders.
    Russo N; Larson C; Kraus N
    Exp Brain Res; 2008 Jun; 188(1):111-24. PubMed ID: 18347784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Speech pattern hearing aids for the profoundly hearing impaired: speech perception and auditory abilities.
    Faulkner A; Ball V; Rosen S; Moore BC; Fourcin A
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1992 Apr; 91(4 Pt 1):2136-55. PubMed ID: 1597605
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. The effects of articulation on the perceived loudness of the projected voice.
    Myers BR; Finnegan EM
    J Voice; 2015 May; 29(3):390.e9-15. PubMed ID: 25770375
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Laryngeal electromyographic responses to perturbations in voice pitch auditory feedback.
    Liu H; Behroozmand R; Bove M; Larson CR
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Jun; 129(6):3946-54. PubMed ID: 21682416
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Flow Glottogram Characteristics and Perceived Degree of Phonatory Pressedness.
    Millgård M; Fors T; Sundberg J
    J Voice; 2016 May; 30(3):287-92. PubMed ID: 26001499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Age-related differences in vocal responses to pitch feedback perturbations: a preliminary study.
    Liu H; Russo NM; Larson CR
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2010 Feb; 127(2):1042-6. PubMed ID: 20136225
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Auditory-Motor Perturbations of Voice Fundamental Frequency: Feedback Delay and Amplification.
    Weerathunge HR; Abur D; Enos NM; Brown KM; Stepp CE
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2020 Sep; 63(9):2846-2860. PubMed ID: 32755506
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Modulation of auditory-vocal feedback control due to planned changes in voice f
    Kim JH; Larson CR
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2019 Mar; 145(3):1482. PubMed ID: 31067945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Effects of delayed auditory feedback (DAF) on the pitch-shift reflex.
    Hain TC; Burnett TA; Larson CR; Kiran S
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2001 May; 109(5 Pt 1):2146-52. PubMed ID: 11386566
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Motor-Learning-Based Adjustment of Ambulatory Feedback on Vocal Loudness for Patients With Parkinson's Disease.
    Gustafsson J; Ternström S; Södersten M; Schalling E
    J Voice; 2016 Jul; 30(4):407-15. PubMed ID: 26168903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Voice fundamental frequency modulates vocal response to pitch perturbations during English speech.
    Liu H; Auger J; Larson CR
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2010 Jan; 127(1):EL1-5. PubMed ID: 20058940
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Evaluation of two algorithms for detecting human frequency-following responses to voice pitch.
    Jeng FC; Hu J; Dickman B; Lin CY; Lin CD; Wang CY; Chung HK; Li X
    Int J Audiol; 2011 Jan; 50(1):14-26. PubMed ID: 21047294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. The accuracy of a voice vote.
    Titze IR; Palaparthi A
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2014 Jan; 135(1):362-8. PubMed ID: 24437776
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. The effects of production and presentation level on the auditory distance perception of speech.
    Brungart DS; Scott KR
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2001 Jul; 110(1):425-40. PubMed ID: 11508968
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Principal component analysis reveals differential attentional modulation of the vocal response to pitch perturbation.
    Okazaki S; Mori K; Okada M
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2014 Jul; 136(1):334-40. PubMed ID: 24993217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Equal autophonic level curves under different room acoustics conditions.
    Pelegrín-García D; Fuentes-Mendizábal O; Brunskog J; Jeong CH
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Jul; 130(1):228-38. PubMed ID: 21786893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. The contribution of phonation type to the perception of vocal emotions in German: an articulatory synthesis study.
    Birkholz P; Martin L; Willmes K; Kröger BJ; Neuschaefer-Rube C
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2015 Mar; 137(3):1503-12. PubMed ID: 25786961
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Early pitch-shift response is active in both steady and dynamic voice pitch control.
    Burnett TA; Larson CR
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2002 Sep; 112(3 Pt 1):1058-63. PubMed ID: 12243154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.