These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
3. Listener sensitivity to individual talker differences in voice-onset-time. Allen JS; Miller JL J Acoust Soc Am; 2004 Jun; 115(6):3171-83. PubMed ID: 15237841 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Phonetic convergence across multiple measures and model talkers. Pardo JS; Urmanche A; Wilman S; Wiener J Atten Percept Psychophys; 2017 Feb; 79(2):637-659. PubMed ID: 27826946 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Talker Versus Dialect Effects on Speech Intelligibility: A Symmetrical Study. McCloy DR; Wright RA; Souza PE Lang Speech; 2015 Sep; 58(Pt 3):371-86. PubMed ID: 26529902 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Acoustic-phonetic correlates of talker intelligibility for adults and children. Hazan V; Markham D J Acoust Soc Am; 2004 Nov; 116(5):3108-18. PubMed ID: 15603156 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Accent Intelligibility Differences in Noise Across Native and Nonnative Accents: Effects of Talker-Listener Pairing at Acoustic-Phonetic and Lexical Levels. Stringer L; Iverson P J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2019 Jul; 62(7):2213-2226. PubMed ID: 31251681 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Distributional learning for speech reflects cumulative exposure to a talker's phonetic distributions. Theodore RM; Monto NR Psychon Bull Rev; 2019 Jun; 26(3):985-992. PubMed ID: 30604404 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. On the perception of similarity among talkers. Remez RE; Fellowes JM; Nagel DS J Acoust Soc Am; 2007 Dec; 122(6):3688-96. PubMed ID: 18247776 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Talker differences in clear and conversational speech: vowel intelligibility for normal-hearing listeners. Ferguson SH J Acoust Soc Am; 2004 Oct; 116(4 Pt 1):2365-73. PubMed ID: 15532667 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Effects of talker variability on perceptual learning of dialects. Clopper CG; Pisoni DB Lang Speech; 2004; 47(Pt 3):207-39. PubMed ID: 15697151 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The Reliability of Individual Differences in VOT Imitation. Wade L; Lai W; Tamminga M Lang Speech; 2021 Sep; 64(3):576-593. PubMed ID: 32772791 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Stimulus variability and the phonetic relevance hypothesis: effects of variability in speaking style, fundamental frequency, and speaking rate on spoken word identification. Sommers MS; Barcroft J J Acoust Soc Am; 2006 Apr; 119(4):2406-16. PubMed ID: 16642853 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Talker identification based on phonetic information. Remez RE; Fellowes JM; Rubin PE J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1997 Jun; 23(3):651-66. PubMed ID: 9180039 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The Montclair Map Task: Balance, Efficacy, and Efficiency in Conversational Interaction. Pardo JS; Urmanche A; Gash H; Wiener J; Mason N; Wilman S; Francis K; Decker A Lang Speech; 2019 Jun; 62(2):378-398. PubMed ID: 29857788 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Phonetic convergence in spontaneous conversations as a function of interlocutor language distance. Kim M; Horton WS; Bradlow AR Lab Phonol; 2011 May; 2(1):125-156. PubMed ID: 23637712 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Lexically guided retuning of visual phonetic categories. van der Zande P; Jesse A; Cutler A J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Jul; 134(1):562-71. PubMed ID: 23862831 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Acoustic differences, listener expectations, and the perceptual accommodation of talker variability. Magnuson JS; Nusbaum HC J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2007 Apr; 33(2):391-409. PubMed ID: 17469975 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The role of fundamental frequency in phonetic accommodation. Babel M; Bulatov D Lang Speech; 2012 Jun; 55(Pt 2):231-48. PubMed ID: 22783633 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]