These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

243 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16642853)

  • 1. Stimulus variability and the phonetic relevance hypothesis: effects of variability in speaking style, fundamental frequency, and speaking rate on spoken word identification.
    Sommers MS; Barcroft J
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2006 Apr; 119(4):2406-16. PubMed ID: 16642853
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Stimulus variability and spoken word recognition. I. Effects of variability in speaking rate and overall amplitude.
    Sommers MS; Nygaard LC; Pisoni DB
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1994 Sep; 96(3):1314-24. PubMed ID: 7962998
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A study of regressive place assimilation in spontaneous speech and its implications for spoken word recognition.
    Dilley LC; Pitt MA
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2007 Oct; 122(4):2340-53. PubMed ID: 17902869
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Individual talker differences in voice-onset-time.
    Allen JS; Miller JL; DeSteno D
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2003 Jan; 113(1):544-52. PubMed ID: 12558290
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Acoustic properties of naturally produced clear speech at normal speaking rates.
    Krause JC; Braida LD
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2004 Jan; 115(1):362-78. PubMed ID: 14759028
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Perceptual invariance of coarticulated vowels over variations in speaking rate.
    Stack JW; Strange W; Jenkins JJ; Clarke WD; Trent SA
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2006 Apr; 119(4):2394-405. PubMed ID: 16642852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Some effects of talker variability on spoken word recognition.
    Mullennix JW; Pisoni DB; Martin CS
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1989 Jan; 85(1):365-78. PubMed ID: 2921419
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Enhancement effects of clear speech and word-initial position in Korean glides.
    Chang SE
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2017 Jun; 141(6):4188. PubMed ID: 28618810
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Stimulus-based lexical distinctiveness as a general word-recognition mechanism.
    Mattys SL; Bernstein LE; Auer ET
    Percept Psychophys; 2002 May; 64(4):667-79. PubMed ID: 12132766
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Some considerations in evaluating spoken word recognition by normal-hearing, noise-masked normal-hearing, and cochlear implant listeners. I: The effects of response format.
    Sommers MS; Kirk KI; Pisoni DB
    Ear Hear; 1997 Apr; 18(2):89-99. PubMed ID: 9099558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effects of stimulus variability on speech perception in listeners with hearing impairment.
    Kirk KI; Pisoni DB; Miyamoto RC
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 1997 Dec; 40(6):1395-405. PubMed ID: 9430759
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effect of speaking rate on the identification of word boundaries.
    Schwab S; Miller JL; Grosjean F; Mondini M
    Phonetica; 2008; 65(3):173-86. PubMed ID: 18679044
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Altering context speech rate can cause words to appear or disappear.
    Dilley LC; Pitt MA
    Psychol Sci; 2010 Nov; 21(11):1664-70. PubMed ID: 20876883
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Recognizing spoken words: the neighborhood activation model.
    Luce PA; Pisoni DB
    Ear Hear; 1998 Feb; 19(1):1-36. PubMed ID: 9504270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Sentence recognition materials based on frequency of word use and lexical confusability.
    Bell TS; Wilson RH
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2001; 12(10):514-22. PubMed ID: 11791938
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Recognition of spoken words by native and non-native listeners: talker-, listener-, and item-related factors.
    Bradlow AR; Pisoni DB
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1999 Oct; 106(4 Pt 1):2074-85. PubMed ID: 10530030
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Lexical frequency and acoustic reduction in spoken Dutch.
    Pluymaekers M; Ernestus M; Baayen RH
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2005 Oct; 118(4):2561-9. PubMed ID: 16266176
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The influence of the lexicon on speech read word recognition: contrasting segmental and lexical distinctiveness.
    Auer ET
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2002 Jun; 9(2):341-7. PubMed ID: 12120798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Speaking clearly for the hard of hearing. II: Acoustic characteristics of clear and conversational speech.
    Picheny MA; Durlach NI; Braida LD
    J Speech Hear Res; 1986 Dec; 29(4):434-46. PubMed ID: 3795886
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. On phonetic convergence during conversational interaction.
    Pardo JS
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2006 Apr; 119(4):2382-93. PubMed ID: 16642851
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.