These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

103 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16643079)

  • 21. Analysis of simulated angiographic procedures. Part 2: extracting efficiency data from audio and video recordings.
    Duncan JR; Kline B; Glaiberman CB
    J Vasc Interv Radiol; 2007 Apr; 18(4):535-44. PubMed ID: 17446545
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Development and validation of a virtual reality simulator: human factors input to interventional radiology training.
    Johnson SJ; Guediri SM; Kilkenny C; Clough PJ
    Hum Factors; 2011 Dec; 53(6):612-25. PubMed ID: 22235524
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Endovascular training with animals versus virtual reality systems: an economic analysis.
    Berry M; Hellström M; Göthlin J; Reznick R; Lönn L
    J Vasc Interv Radiol; 2008 Feb; 19(2 Pt 1):233-8. PubMed ID: 18341955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. [Simulation training in surgical education - application of virtual reality laparoscopic simulators in a surgical skills course].
    Lehmann KS; Gröne J; Lauscher JC; Ritz JP; Holmer C; Pohlen U; Buhr HJ
    Zentralbl Chir; 2012 Apr; 137(2):130-7. PubMed ID: 22495487
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. The utility of endovascular simulation to improve technical performance and stimulate continued interest of preclinical medical students in vascular surgery.
    Lee JT; Qiu M; Teshome M; Raghavan SS; Tedesco MM; Dalman RL
    J Surg Educ; 2009; 66(6):367-73. PubMed ID: 20142137
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Evaluation of the educational value of a virtual reality TURP simulator according to a curriculum-based approach.
    Tjiam IM; Berkers CH; Schout BM; Brinkman WM; Witjes JA; Scherpbier AJ; Hendrikx AJ; Koldewijn EL
    Simul Healthc; 2014 Oct; 9(5):288-94. PubMed ID: 25275719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Evaluation of the educational effectiveness of a virtual reality intravenous insertion simulator.
    Reznek MA; Rawn CL; Krummel TM
    Acad Emerg Med; 2002 Nov; 9(11):1319-25. PubMed ID: 12414488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Face, content, construct and concurrent validity of dry laboratory exercises for robotic training using a global assessment tool.
    Ramos P; Montez J; Tripp A; Ng CK; Gill IS; Hung AJ
    BJU Int; 2014 May; 113(5):836-42. PubMed ID: 24224500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Assessment of performance measures and learning curves for use of a virtual-reality ultrasound simulator in transvaginal ultrasound examination.
    Madsen ME; Konge L; Nørgaard LN; Tabor A; Ringsted C; Klemmensen AK; Ottesen B; Tolsgaard MG
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2014 Dec; 44(6):693-9. PubMed ID: 24789453
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Face and construct validity of a novel mechanical ERCP simulator.
    van der Wiel SE; Koch AD; Bruno MJ
    Endosc Int Open; 2018 Jun; 6(6):E758-E765. PubMed ID: 29881768
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Virtual reality simulator training for laparoscopic colectomy: what metrics have construct validity?
    Shanmugan S; Leblanc F; Senagore AJ; Ellis CN; Stein SL; Khan S; Delaney CP; Champagne BJ
    Dis Colon Rectum; 2014 Feb; 57(2):210-4. PubMed ID: 24401883
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Technical skills assessment in a coronary angiography simulator for construct validation.
    Jensen UJ; Jensen J; Olivecrona GK; Ahlberg G; Tornvall P
    Simul Healthc; 2013 Oct; 8(5):324-8. PubMed ID: 23598862
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Long-term impact of a preclinical endovascular skills course on medical student career choices.
    Lee JT; Son JH; Chandra V; Lilo E; Dalman RL
    J Vasc Surg; 2011 Oct; 54(4):1193-200. PubMed ID: 21723068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Validation of computer simulation training for esophagogastroduodenoscopy: Pilot study.
    Sedlack RE
    J Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2007 Aug; 22(8):1214-9. PubMed ID: 17559386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Assessment of a percutaneous iliosacral screw insertion simulator.
    Tonetti J; Vadcard L; Girard P; Dubois M; Merloz P; Troccaz J
    Orthop Traumatol Surg Res; 2009 Nov; 95(7):471-7. PubMed ID: 19801213
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Validation study of a virtual reality robotic simulator--role as an assessment tool?
    Lee JY; Mucksavage P; Kerbl DC; Huynh VB; Etafy M; McDougall EM
    J Urol; 2012 Mar; 187(3):998-1002. PubMed ID: 22264455
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Development and validation of a surgical training simulator with haptic feedback for learning bone-sawing skill.
    Lin Y; Wang X; Wu F; Chen X; Wang C; Shen G
    J Biomed Inform; 2014 Apr; 48():122-9. PubMed ID: 24380817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Comparative assessment of three standardized robotic surgery training methods.
    Hung AJ; Jayaratna IS; Teruya K; Desai MM; Gill IS; Goh AC
    BJU Int; 2013 Oct; 112(6):864-71. PubMed ID: 23470136
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Augmented versus virtual reality laparoscopic simulation: what is the difference? A comparison of the ProMIS augmented reality laparoscopic simulator versus LapSim virtual reality laparoscopic simulator.
    Botden SM; Buzink SN; Schijven MP; Jakimowicz JJ
    World J Surg; 2007 Apr; 31(4):764-72. PubMed ID: 17361356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Validation and learning in the Procedicus KSA virtual reality surgical simulator.
    Ström P; Kjellin A; Hedman L; Johnson E; Wredmark T; Felländer-Tsai L
    Surg Endosc; 2003 Feb; 17(2):227-31. PubMed ID: 12399848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.