These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

140 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16643754)

  • 21. Comparative study of higher-order aberrations after conventional laser in situ keratomileusis and laser epithelial keratomileusis for myopia using the technolas 217z laser platform.
    Kirwan C; O'Keefe M
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2009 Jan; 147(1):77-83. PubMed ID: 18775529
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. An interval-censored model for predicting myopic regression after laser in situ keratomileusis.
    Chen YI; Chien KL; Wang IJ; Yen AM; Chen LS; Lin PJ; Chen TH
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2007 Aug; 48(8):3516-23. PubMed ID: 17652718
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. A prospective, contralateral eye study comparing thin-flap LASIK (sub-Bowman keratomileusis) with photorefractive keratectomy.
    Slade SG; Durrie DS; Binder PS
    Ophthalmology; 2009 Jun; 116(6):1075-82. PubMed ID: 19486798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Five-year outcome of LASIK for myopia.
    Kato N; Toda I; Hori-Komai Y; Sakai C; Tsubota K
    Ophthalmology; 2008 May; 115(5):839-844.e2. PubMed ID: 17900692
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Intracorneal ring segment implantation in corneas with post-laser in situ keratomileusis keratectasia.
    Piñero DP; Alio JL; Uceda-Montanes A; El Kady B; Pascual I
    Ophthalmology; 2009 Sep; 116(9):1665-74. PubMed ID: 19643485
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. One-year clinical results after epi-LASIK for myopia.
    Katsanevaki VJ; Kalyvianaki MI; Kavroulaki DS; Pallikaris IG
    Ophthalmology; 2007 Jun; 114(6):1111-7. PubMed ID: 17320960
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Ten-year follow-up of laser in situ keratomileusis for myopia of up to -10 diopters.
    Alió JL; Muftuoglu O; Ortiz D; Pérez-Santonja JJ; Artola A; Ayala MJ; Garcia MJ; de Luna GC
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2008 Jan; 145(1):46-54. PubMed ID: 18154754
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Efficacy of nonsimultaneous bilateral LASIK after nonsimultaneous bilateral penetrating keratoplasty.
    Mann E; Zaidman GW; Shukla S
    Cornea; 2006 Oct; 25(9):1053-6. PubMed ID: 17133052
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. LASIK after retinal detachment surgery.
    Farvardin M; Farvardin M; Hosseini H
    Acta Ophthalmol Scand; 2006 Jun; 84(3):411-4. PubMed ID: 16704709
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. [Contrast sensitivity function in myopic LASIK].
    Yan Z; Hu J; Gu X; Sun M; Yang L
    Zhonghua Yan Ke Za Zhi; 2002 Nov; 38(11):677-9. PubMed ID: 12487899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Safety and efficacy of cyclosporine 0.05% drops versus unpreserved artificial tears in dry-eye patients having laser in situ keratomileusis.
    Salib GM; McDonald MB; Smolek M
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2006 May; 32(5):772-8. PubMed ID: 16765793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Laser-assisted subepithelial keratectomy retreatment after laser in situ keratomileusis.
    Saeed A; O'Doherty M; O'Doherty J; O'Keefe M
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2008 Oct; 34(10):1736-41. PubMed ID: 18812126
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Femtosecond laser versus mechanical microkeratome for LASIK: a randomized controlled study.
    Patel SV; Maguire LJ; McLaren JW; Hodge DO; Bourne WM
    Ophthalmology; 2007 Aug; 114(8):1482-90. PubMed ID: 17350688
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Retreatment after wavefront-guided and standard myopic LASIK.
    Jin GJ; Merkley KH
    Ophthalmology; 2006 Sep; 113(9):1623-8. PubMed ID: 16828506
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Comparison of laser in situ keratomileusis and photorefractive keratectomy results: long-term follow-up.
    Miyai T; Miyata K; Nejima R; Honbo M; Minami K; Amano S
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2008 Sep; 34(9):1527-31. PubMed ID: 18721714
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Control-matched analysis of laser in situ keratomileusis outcomes in high myopia.
    Kojima T; Hallak JA; Azar DT
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2008 Apr; 34(4):544-50. PubMed ID: 18361973
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. [Contrast sensitivity after laser in situ keratomileusis for myopia (LASIK-M)].
    Cardona Ausina C ; Pérez Santonja JJ ; Ayala Espinosa MJ ; Claramonte Meseguer P ; Artola Roig A ; Alió JL
    Arch Soc Esp Oftalmol; 2000 Aug; 75(8):541-6. PubMed ID: 11151216
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Long-term follow-up of Intacs for post-LASIK corneal ectasia.
    Kymionis GD; Tsiklis NS; Pallikaris AI; Kounis G; Diakonis VF; Astyrakakis N; Siganos CS
    Ophthalmology; 2006 Nov; 113(11):1909-17. PubMed ID: 17074560
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Role of depressive symptoms in patient satisfaction with visual quality after laser in situ keratomileusis.
    Morse JS; Schallhorn SC; Hettinger K; Tanzer D
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2009 Feb; 35(2):341-6. PubMed ID: 19185253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Wavefront-guided versus wavefront-optimized laser in situ keratomileusis: contralateral comparative study.
    Padmanabhan P; Mrochen M; Basuthkar S; Viswanathan D; Joseph R
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2008 Mar; 34(3):389-97. PubMed ID: 18299062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.