198 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16644232)
1. Analysis of mechanical stress in reconstruction plates for bridging mandibular angle defects.
Knoll WD; Gaida A; Maurer P
J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2006 Jun; 34(4):201-9. PubMed ID: 16644232
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. [Stress tests of reconstruction plates for bridging mandibular angle defects].
Knoll WD; Gaida A; Maurer P
Mund Kiefer Gesichtschir; 2004 Jul; 8(4):237-43. PubMed ID: 15293119
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Adaquate fixation of plates for stability during mandibular reconstruction.
Kimura A; Nagasao T; Kaneko T; Tamaki T; Miyamoto J; Nakajima T
J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2006 Jun; 34(4):193-200. PubMed ID: 16624567
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A comparison of stresses in implantation for grafted and plate-and-screw mandible reconstruction.
Nagasao T; Miyamoto J; Tamaki T; Kawana H
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2010 Mar; 109(3):346-56. PubMed ID: 20097102
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. 3D-FEM and histomorphology of mandibular reconstruction with the titanium functionally dynamic bridging plate.
Schuller-Götzburg P; Pleschberger M; Rammerstorfer FG; Krenkel C
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2009 Dec; 38(12):1298-305. PubMed ID: 19828292
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The biomechanical aspects of reconstruction for segmental defects of the mandible: a finite element study to assess the optimisation of plate and screw factors.
Bujtár P; Simonovics J; Váradi K; Sándor GK; Avery CM
J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2014 Sep; 42(6):855-62. PubMed ID: 24467871
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Finite element analysis of customized reconstruction plates for mandibular continuity defect therapy.
Narra N; Valášek J; Hannula M; Marcián P; Sándor GK; Hyttinen J; Wolff J
J Biomech; 2014 Jan; 47(1):264-8. PubMed ID: 24290177
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Finite element analysis of biplanar customized reconstruction plates for lateral and central segmental defects of mandible.
Demir E; Yalçın G; Kalaycı A
Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin; 2024; 27(4):489-497. PubMed ID: 36920278
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Biomechanical testing of different osteosynthesis systems for segmental resection of the mandible.
Schupp W; Arzdorf M; Linke B; Gutwald R
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2007 May; 65(5):924-30. PubMed ID: 17448842
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparative finite element analysis of the biomechanical stability of 2.0 fixation plates in atrophic mandibular fractures.
Vajgel A; Camargo IB; Willmersdorf RB; de Melo TM; Laureano Filho JR; Vasconcellos RJ
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2013 Feb; 71(2):335-42. PubMed ID: 23351762
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Finite Element Evaluation of Different Osteosynthesis Variations That Used After Segmental Mandibular Resection.
Şanal KO; Özden B; Baş B
J Craniofac Surg; 2017 Jan; 28(1):61-65. PubMed ID: 27893561
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Biomechanical evaluation of a new MatrixMandible plating system on cadaver mandibles.
Gateno J; Cookston C; Hsu SS; Stal DN; Durrani SK; Gold J; Ismaily S; Alexander JW; Noble PC; Xia JJ
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2013 Nov; 71(11):1900-14. PubMed ID: 24012175
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Mechanical stress in plates for bridging reconstruction mandibular defects and purposes of double plate reinforcement.
Hoefert S; Taier R
J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2018 May; 46(5):785-794. PubMed ID: 29567342
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Analysis of complications after reconstruction of bone defects involving complete mandibular resection using finite element modelling.
Markwardt J; Pfeifer G; Eckelt U; Reitemeier B
Onkologie; 2007 Mar; 30(3):121-6. PubMed ID: 17341898
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Computation and experimental examination of an implant structure made by a fibre-reinforced building method for the bypass of continuity defects of the mandible].
Hufenbach W; Gottwald R; Markwardt J; Eckelt U; Modler N; Reitemeier B
Biomed Tech (Berl); 2008 Dec; 53(6):306-13. PubMed ID: 19037874
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A 3-dimensional finite-element analysis investigating the biomechanical behavior of the mandible and plate osteosynthesis in cases of fractures of the condylar process.
Wagner A; Krach W; Schicho K; Undt G; Ploder O; Ewers R
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2002 Dec; 94(6):678-86. PubMed ID: 12464890
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Biomechanical evaluation of a novel hybrid reconstruction plate for mandible segmental defects: A finite element analysis and fatigue testing.
Wu CH; Lin YS; Liu YS; Lin CL
J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2017 Oct; 45(10):1671-1680. PubMed ID: 28838835
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Biomechanical analysis of titanium fixation plates and screws in mandibular angle fractures.
Atik F; Atac MS; Özkan A; Kilinc Y; Arslan M
Niger J Clin Pract; 2016; 19(3):386-90. PubMed ID: 27022805
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Optimal design of an individual endoprosthesis for the reconstruction of extensive mandibular defects with finite element analysis.
Li P; Shen L; Li J; Liang R; Tian W; Tang W
J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2014 Jan; 42(1):73-8. PubMed ID: 23541861
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The comparison between various methods of mandibular reconstruction based on finite element analysis.
Parvan M; Khaghaninejad MS; Karimi MT
Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 2024 Apr; 238(4):423-429. PubMed ID: 38415325
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
