355 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16645103)
1. Treatment of the young active patient with osteoarthritis of the hip. A five- to seven-year comparison of hybrid total hip arthroplasty and metal-on-metal resurfacing.
Pollard TC; Baker RP; Eastaugh-Waring SJ; Bannister GC
J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2006 May; 88(5):592-600. PubMed ID: 16645103
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A medium-term comparison of hybrid hip replacement and Birmingham hip resurfacing in active young patients.
Baker RP; Pollard TC; Eastaugh-Waring SJ; Bannister GC
J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2011 Feb; 93(2):158-63. PubMed ID: 21282752
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Birmingham hip resurfacing arthroplasty: a series of 110 consecutive hips with a minimum five-year clinical and radiological follow-up.
Heilpern GN; Shah NN; Fordyce MJ
J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2008 Sep; 90(9):1137-42. PubMed ID: 18757951
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Clinical and radiographic results of metal-on-metal hip resurfacing with a minimum ten-year follow-up.
Amstutz HC; Le Duff MJ; Campbell PA; Gruen TA; Wisk LE
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2010 Nov; 92(16):2663-71. PubMed ID: 21084576
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Metal-on-metal hip resurfacing for obese patients.
Le Duff MJ; Amstutz HC; Dorey FJ
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2007 Dec; 89(12):2705-11. PubMed ID: 18056503
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A comparison of total hip resurfacing and total hip arthroplasty - patients and outcomes.
Fowble VA; dela Rosa MA; Schmalzried TP
Bull NYU Hosp Jt Dis; 2009; 67(2):108-12. PubMed ID: 19583535
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Metal-on-metal hip resurfacing compared with 28-mm diameter metal-on-metal total hip replacement: a randomised study with six to nine years' follow-up.
Vendittoli PA; Rivière C; Roy AG; Barry J; Lusignan D; Lavigne M
Bone Joint J; 2013 Nov; 95-B(11):1464-73. PubMed ID: 24151264
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Metal-on-metal hybrid surface arthroplasty. Surgical Technique.
Amstutz HC; Beaulé PE; Dorey FJ; Le Duff MJ; Campbell PA; Gruen TA
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2006 Sep; 88 Suppl 1 Pt 2():234-49. PubMed ID: 16951096
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Birmingham hip resurfacing at a mean of ten years: results from an independent centre.
Coulter G; Young DA; Dalziel RE; Shimmin AJ
J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2012 Mar; 94(3):315-21. PubMed ID: 22371536
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The five-year results of the Birmingham Hip Resurfacing arthroplasty: an independent series.
Steffen RT; Pandit HP; Palan J; Beard DJ; Gundle R; McLardy-Smith P; Murray DW; Gill HS
J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2008 Apr; 90(4):436-41. PubMed ID: 18378915
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Femoral component neck fracture after failed hip resurfacing arthroplasty.
Bos PK; van Biezen FC; Weinans H
J Arthroplasty; 2011 Dec; 26(8):1570.e1-4. PubMed ID: 21397452
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The early outcome of Birmingham hip resurfacing: an independent Thai surgeon experiences.
Larbpaiboonpong V; Turajane T; Pragtong P
J Med Assoc Thai; 2009 Dec; 92 Suppl 6():S134-40. PubMed ID: 20120675
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Frequent femoral neck osteolysis with Birmingham mid-head resection resurfacing arthroplasty in young patients.
Asaad A; Hart A; Khoo MM; Ilo K; Schaller G; Black JD; Muirhead-Allwood S
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2015 Dec; 473(12):3770-8. PubMed ID: 25981716
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Five-year results of the ASR XL Acetabular System and the ASR Hip Resurfacing System: an analysis from the Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry.
de Steiger RN; Hang JR; Miller LN; Graves SE; Davidson DC
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2011 Dec; 93(24):2287-93. PubMed ID: 22258775
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Articular surface replacement of the hip: a prospective single-surgeon series.
Jameson SS; Langton DJ; Nargol AV
J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2010 Jan; 92(1):28-37. PubMed ID: 20044675
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Cementless total hip arthroplasty with a metal-on-metal bearing in patients younger than 50 years.
Hwang KT; Kim YH; Kim YS; Choi IY
J Arthroplasty; 2011 Dec; 26(8):1481-7. PubMed ID: 21414748
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Clinical and radiographic outcomes of the Birmingham Hip Resurfacing arthroplasty at a minimum follow-up of 10 years: results from an independent centre.
Moroni A; Miscione MT; Orsini R; Micera G; Mosca S; Sinapi F; De Girolamo L; Banfi G
Hip Int; 2017 Mar; 27(2):134-139. PubMed ID: 28362050
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Metal-on-metal hybrid surface arthroplasty: two to six-year follow-up study.
Amstutz HC; Beaulé PE; Dorey FJ; Le Duff MJ; Campbell PA; Gruen TA
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2004 Jan; 86(1):28-39. PubMed ID: 14711942
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Resurfacing arthroplasty for patients with osteonecrosis.
Stulberg BN; Fitts SM; Zadzilka JD; Trier K
Bull NYU Hosp Jt Dis; 2009; 67(2):138-41. PubMed ID: 19583542
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. An 18-year comparison of hybrid total hip replacement and Birmingham hip resurfacing in active young patients.
Jonas SC; Whitehouse MR; Bick S; Bannister GC; Baker RP
Hip Int; 2019 Nov; 29(6):630-637. PubMed ID: 30672350
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
