These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

349 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16645103)

  • 1. Treatment of the young active patient with osteoarthritis of the hip. A five- to seven-year comparison of hybrid total hip arthroplasty and metal-on-metal resurfacing.
    Pollard TC; Baker RP; Eastaugh-Waring SJ; Bannister GC
    J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2006 May; 88(5):592-600. PubMed ID: 16645103
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A medium-term comparison of hybrid hip replacement and Birmingham hip resurfacing in active young patients.
    Baker RP; Pollard TC; Eastaugh-Waring SJ; Bannister GC
    J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2011 Feb; 93(2):158-63. PubMed ID: 21282752
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Birmingham hip resurfacing arthroplasty: a series of 110 consecutive hips with a minimum five-year clinical and radiological follow-up.
    Heilpern GN; Shah NN; Fordyce MJ
    J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2008 Sep; 90(9):1137-42. PubMed ID: 18757951
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Clinical and radiographic results of metal-on-metal hip resurfacing with a minimum ten-year follow-up.
    Amstutz HC; Le Duff MJ; Campbell PA; Gruen TA; Wisk LE
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2010 Nov; 92(16):2663-71. PubMed ID: 21084576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Metal-on-metal hip resurfacing for obese patients.
    Le Duff MJ; Amstutz HC; Dorey FJ
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2007 Dec; 89(12):2705-11. PubMed ID: 18056503
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A comparison of total hip resurfacing and total hip arthroplasty - patients and outcomes.
    Fowble VA; dela Rosa MA; Schmalzried TP
    Bull NYU Hosp Jt Dis; 2009; 67(2):108-12. PubMed ID: 19583535
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Metal-on-metal hip resurfacing compared with 28-mm diameter metal-on-metal total hip replacement: a randomised study with six to nine years' follow-up.
    Vendittoli PA; Rivière C; Roy AG; Barry J; Lusignan D; Lavigne M
    Bone Joint J; 2013 Nov; 95-B(11):1464-73. PubMed ID: 24151264
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Metal-on-metal hybrid surface arthroplasty. Surgical Technique.
    Amstutz HC; Beaulé PE; Dorey FJ; Le Duff MJ; Campbell PA; Gruen TA
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2006 Sep; 88 Suppl 1 Pt 2():234-49. PubMed ID: 16951096
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Birmingham hip resurfacing at a mean of ten years: results from an independent centre.
    Coulter G; Young DA; Dalziel RE; Shimmin AJ
    J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2012 Mar; 94(3):315-21. PubMed ID: 22371536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The five-year results of the Birmingham Hip Resurfacing arthroplasty: an independent series.
    Steffen RT; Pandit HP; Palan J; Beard DJ; Gundle R; McLardy-Smith P; Murray DW; Gill HS
    J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2008 Apr; 90(4):436-41. PubMed ID: 18378915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Femoral component neck fracture after failed hip resurfacing arthroplasty.
    Bos PK; van Biezen FC; Weinans H
    J Arthroplasty; 2011 Dec; 26(8):1570.e1-4. PubMed ID: 21397452
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The early outcome of Birmingham hip resurfacing: an independent Thai surgeon experiences.
    Larbpaiboonpong V; Turajane T; Pragtong P
    J Med Assoc Thai; 2009 Dec; 92 Suppl 6():S134-40. PubMed ID: 20120675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Frequent femoral neck osteolysis with Birmingham mid-head resection resurfacing arthroplasty in young patients.
    Asaad A; Hart A; Khoo MM; Ilo K; Schaller G; Black JD; Muirhead-Allwood S
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2015 Dec; 473(12):3770-8. PubMed ID: 25981716
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Five-year results of the ASR XL Acetabular System and the ASR Hip Resurfacing System: an analysis from the Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry.
    de Steiger RN; Hang JR; Miller LN; Graves SE; Davidson DC
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2011 Dec; 93(24):2287-93. PubMed ID: 22258775
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Articular surface replacement of the hip: a prospective single-surgeon series.
    Jameson SS; Langton DJ; Nargol AV
    J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2010 Jan; 92(1):28-37. PubMed ID: 20044675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Cementless total hip arthroplasty with a metal-on-metal bearing in patients younger than 50 years.
    Hwang KT; Kim YH; Kim YS; Choi IY
    J Arthroplasty; 2011 Dec; 26(8):1481-7. PubMed ID: 21414748
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Clinical and radiographic outcomes of the Birmingham Hip Resurfacing arthroplasty at a minimum follow-up of 10 years: results from an independent centre.
    Moroni A; Miscione MT; Orsini R; Micera G; Mosca S; Sinapi F; De Girolamo L; Banfi G
    Hip Int; 2017 Mar; 27(2):134-139. PubMed ID: 28362050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Metal-on-metal hybrid surface arthroplasty: two to six-year follow-up study.
    Amstutz HC; Beaulé PE; Dorey FJ; Le Duff MJ; Campbell PA; Gruen TA
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2004 Jan; 86(1):28-39. PubMed ID: 14711942
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Resurfacing arthroplasty for patients with osteonecrosis.
    Stulberg BN; Fitts SM; Zadzilka JD; Trier K
    Bull NYU Hosp Jt Dis; 2009; 67(2):138-41. PubMed ID: 19583542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. An 18-year comparison of hybrid total hip replacement and Birmingham hip resurfacing in active young patients.
    Jonas SC; Whitehouse MR; Bick S; Bannister GC; Baker RP
    Hip Int; 2019 Nov; 29(6):630-637. PubMed ID: 30672350
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 18.