These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

86 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16646355)

  • 41. Perception of effort at low and moderate intensity exercise in survivors of childhood acute lymphoblastic leukaemia.
    Bell W; Warner JT; Evans WD; Webb DK; Mullen RH; Gregory JW
    Ann Hum Biol; 2006; 33(3):357-71. PubMed ID: 17092872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Changes in ratings of perceived exertion and psychological affect in the early stages of exercise.
    Parfitt G; Eston R
    Percept Mot Skills; 1995 Feb; 80(1):259-66. PubMed ID: 7624202
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Postexercise oxygen consumption in trained females: effect of exercise duration.
    Quinn TJ; Vroman NB; Kertzer R
    Med Sci Sports Exerc; 1994 Jul; 26(7):908-13. PubMed ID: 7934767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Impact of short-term aerobic interval training on maximal exercise in sedentary aged subjects.
    Lepretre PM; Vogel T; Brechat PH; Dufour S; Richard R; Kaltenbach G; Berthel M; Lonsdorfer J
    Int J Clin Pract; 2009 Oct; 63(10):1472-8. PubMed ID: 19769704
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Effect of exercise intensity on exercise-induced lymphocyte apoptosis.
    Navalta JW; Sedlock DA; Park KS
    Int J Sports Med; 2007 Jun; 28(6):539-42. PubMed ID: 17357968
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Physiological responses to treadmill and cycle exercise.
    Abrantes C; Sampaio J; Reis V; Sousa N; Duarte J
    Int J Sports Med; 2012 Jan; 33(1):26-30. PubMed ID: 22052028
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. The oxygen uptake efficiency slope in children with congenital heart disease: construct and group validity.
    Bongers BC; Hulzebos HJ; Blank AC; van Brussel M; Takken T
    Eur J Cardiovasc Prev Rehabil; 2011 Jun; 18(3):384-92. PubMed ID: 21450644
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Let them roam free? Physiological and psychological evidence for the potential of self-selected exercise intensity in public health.
    Ekkekakis P
    Sports Med; 2009; 39(10):857-88. PubMed ID: 19757863
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Can previously sedentary females use the feeling scale to regulate exercise intensity in a gym environment? an observational study.
    Hamlyn-Williams CC; Tempest G; Coombs S; Parfitt G
    BMC Sports Sci Med Rehabil; 2015; 7():30. PubMed ID: 26613045
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Role of self-reported individual differences in preference for and tolerance of exercise intensity in fitness testing performance.
    Hall EE; Petruzzello SJ; Ekkekakis P; Miller PC; Bixby WR
    J Strength Cond Res; 2014 Sep; 28(9):2443-51. PubMed ID: 24531429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Relationship between exercise heart rate and music tempo preference.
    Karageorghis CI; Jones L; Low DC
    Res Q Exerc Sport; 2006 Jun; 77(2):240-50. PubMed ID: 16898279
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. AFFECTIVE RESPONSES TO PRESCRIBED AND SELF-SELECTED STRENGTH TRAINING INTENSITIES.
    Portugal EM; Lattari E; Santos TM; Deslandes AC
    Percept Mot Skills; 2015 Oct; 121(2):465-81. PubMed ID: 26445158
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Revisiting the relationship between exercise heart rate and music tempo preference.
    Karageorghis CI; Jones L; Priest DL; Akers RI; Clarke A; Perry JM; Reddick BT; Bishop DT; Lim HB
    Res Q Exerc Sport; 2011 Jun; 82(2):274-84. PubMed ID: 21699107
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Variability in Intensity Related to Increased Overall Bout Intensity.
    Overstreet BS; Strohacker K
    Am J Health Behav; 2018 Mar; 42(2):12-20. PubMed ID: 29458511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Exploring affective responses to different exercise intensities in low-active young adolescents.
    Stych K; Parfitt G
    J Sport Exerc Psychol; 2011 Aug; 33(4):548-68. PubMed ID: 21808079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Percentage of Peak Workload Is Suitable for Quantification of Exercise Intensity During High-Intensity Intervals: A Comment on Ekkekakis, Hartman, and Ladwig.
    Vollaard NBJ; Metcalfe RS; Kinghorn D; Jung ME; Little JP
    J Sport Exerc Psychol; 2024 Apr; 46(2):63-65. PubMed ID: 38575139
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Analysis of Exercise Intensity Preferences, Tolerance, Competence, and Their Implications for Behavioral Intentions in Fitness Settings.
    Rodrigues F; Jacinto M; Antunes R; Amaro N; Matos R; Monteiro D
    J Funct Morphol Kinesiol; 2023 Sep; 8(3):. PubMed ID: 37754972
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Effects of different combinations of intensity categories on self-reported exercise.
    Courneya KS; Jones LW; Rhodes RE; Blanchard CM
    Res Q Exerc Sport; 2004 Dec; 75(4):429-33. PubMed ID: 15673042
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Why choice of survey mode makes a difference.
    Dillman DA
    Public Health Rep; 2006; 121(1):11-3. PubMed ID: 16416693
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. The Preference for and Tolerance of the Intensity of Exercise Questionnaire: a psychometric evaluation among college women.
    Ekkekakis P; Thome J; Petruzzello SJ; Hall EE
    J Sports Sci; 2008 Mar; 26(5):499-510. PubMed ID: 18274947
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.