These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
76 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16646360)
1. Revisiting the development of time sharing using a dual motor task performance. Getchell N; Pabreja P Res Q Exerc Sport; 2006 Mar; 77(1):131-6. PubMed ID: 16646360 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Interhemispheric sharing of signals and responses and the psychological refractory period. Guiard Y; Requin J Neuropsychologia; 1977; 15(3):427-38. PubMed ID: 854161 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Exceptions to the PRP effect? A comparison of prepared and unconditioned reflexes. Janczyk M; Pfister R; Wallmeier G; Kunde W J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2014 May; 40(3):776-86. PubMed ID: 24417329 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The source of execution-related dual-task interference: motor bottleneck or response monitoring? Bratzke D; Rolke B; Ulrich R J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2009 Oct; 35(5):1413-26. PubMed ID: 19803646 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Cognitive neuroscience: searching for the bottleneck in the brain. Spence C Curr Biol; 2008 Oct; 18(20):R965-8. PubMed ID: 18957255 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Virtually perfect time sharing in dual-task performance: uncorking the central cognitive bottleneck. Schumacher EH; Seymour TL; Glass JM; Fencsik DE; Lauber EJ; Kieras DE; Meyer DE Psychol Sci; 2001 Mar; 12(2):101-8. PubMed ID: 11340917 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Time limitations on visual information processing by a human operator. Meshcheryakov VA; Kazanovskaya IA Hum Physiol; 1979; 4(2):193-8. PubMed ID: 447338 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Stopping while going! Response inhibition does not suffer dual-task interference. Yamaguchi M; Logan GD; Bissett PG J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2012 Feb; 38(1):123-34. PubMed ID: 21574740 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Stress improves task processing efficiency in dual-tasks. Beste C; Yildiz A; Meissner TW; Wolf OT Behav Brain Res; 2013 Sep; 252():260-5. PubMed ID: 23769959 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Central interference in driving: is there any stopping the psychological refractory period? Levy J; Pashler H; Boer E Psychol Sci; 2006 Mar; 17(3):228-35. PubMed ID: 16507063 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Dual-task effect on gait balance control in adolescents with concussion. Howell DR; Osternig LR; Chou LS Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2013 Aug; 94(8):1513-20. PubMed ID: 23643687 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Dual-task gait performance among community-dwelling senior women: the role of balance confidence and executive functions. Liu-Ambrose T; Katarynych LA; Ashe MC; Nagamatsu LS; Hsu CL J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci; 2009 Sep; 64(9):975-82. PubMed ID: 19429702 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Late backward effects in the refractory period paradigm: effects of Task 2 execution on Task 1 performance. Ruiz Fernández S; Ulrich R Psychol Res; 2010 Jul; 74(4):378-87. PubMed ID: 19855997 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The effect of a concurrent task on the walking performance of preschool children. Cherng RJ; Liang LY; Hwang IS; Chen JY Gait Posture; 2007 Jul; 26(2):231-7. PubMed ID: 17045803 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Response activation in overlapping tasks and the response-selection bottleneck. Schubert T; Fischer R; Stelzel C J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2008 Apr; 34(2):376-97. PubMed ID: 18377177 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The influence of dual-task conditions on movement in young adults with and without Down syndrome. Horvat M; Croce R; Tomporowski P; Barna MC Res Dev Disabil; 2013 Oct; 34(10):3517-25. PubMed ID: 23962599 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Dual task performance: effects of increasing difficulty on auditory ERPs and RTs. Ragazzoni A; Matà S; Grippo A; Pinto F Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol Suppl; 1996; 46():253-60. PubMed ID: 9059800 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. The interacting effect of cognitive and motor task demands on performance of gait, balance and cognition in young adults. Szturm T; Maharjan P; Marotta JJ; Shay B; Shrestha S; Sakhalkar V Gait Posture; 2013 Sep; 38(4):596-602. PubMed ID: 23477841 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]