These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

125 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16646386)

  • 1. Valuation of biodiversity effects from reduced pesticide use.
    Schou JS; Hasler B; Nahrstedt B
    Integr Environ Assess Manag; 2006 Apr; 2(2):174-81. PubMed ID: 16646386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Economic valuation of biodiversity conservation: the meaning of numbers.
    Martín-López B; Montes C; Benayas J
    Conserv Biol; 2008 Jun; 22(3):624-35. PubMed ID: 18410400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Valuation of crop genetic resources in Kaski, Nepal: farmers' willingness to pay for rice landraces conservation.
    Poudel D; Johnsen FH
    J Environ Manage; 2009 Jan; 90(1):483-91. PubMed ID: 18359142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Multiple approaches to valuation of conservation design and low-impact development features in residential subdivisions.
    Bowman T; Tyndall JC; Thompson J; Kliebenstein J; Colletti JP
    J Environ Manage; 2012 Aug; 104():101-13. PubMed ID: 22487398
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Household location choices: implications for biodiversity conservation.
    Peterson MN; Chen X; Liu J
    Conserv Biol; 2008 Aug; 22(4):912-21. PubMed ID: 18445074
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Scope insensitivity in contingent valuation of complex environmental amenities.
    Veisten K; Fredrik Hoen H; Navrud S; Strand J
    J Environ Manage; 2004 Dec; 73(4):317-31. PubMed ID: 15531390
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Pesticides and farmer health in Nicaragua: a willingness-to-pay approach to evaluation.
    Garming H; Waibel H
    Eur J Health Econ; 2009 May; 10(2):125-33. PubMed ID: 18521638
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Striking a balance between biodiversity conservation and socioeconomic viability in the design of marine protected areas.
    Klein CJ; Chan A; Kircher L; Cundiff AJ; Gardner N; Hrovat Y; Scholz A; Kendall BE; Airamé S
    Conserv Biol; 2008 Jun; 22(3):691-700. PubMed ID: 18325043
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Assessing the value of species: a case study on the willingness to pay for species protection in Chile.
    Cerda C; Losada T
    Environ Monit Assess; 2013 Dec; 185(12):10479-93. PubMed ID: 23912424
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Urban Australians using recycled water for domestic non-potable use--an evaluation of the attributes price, saltiness, colour and odour using conjoint analysis.
    Hurlimann A; McKay J
    J Environ Manage; 2007 Apr; 83(1):93-104. PubMed ID: 16678338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Safety and nutritional assessment of GM plants and derived food and feed: the role of animal feeding trials.
    EFSA GMO Panel Working Group on Animal Feeding Trials
    Food Chem Toxicol; 2008 Mar; 46 Suppl 1():S2-70. PubMed ID: 18328408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The 2010 biodiversity indicators: challenges for science and policy.
    Mace GM; Baillie JE
    Conserv Biol; 2007 Dec; 21(6):1406-13. PubMed ID: 18173464
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Assessing the willingness of the public to pay to conserve urban green space: the Hangzhou City, China, case.
    Chen B; Bao Z; Zhu Z
    J Environ Health; 2006 Dec; 69(5):26-30. PubMed ID: 17190339
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. South African farm workers' interpretation of risk assessment data expressed as pictograms on pesticide labels.
    Rother HA
    Environ Res; 2008 Nov; 108(3):419-27. PubMed ID: 18755451
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Pesticide Environmental Accounting: a method for assessing the external costs of individual pesticide applications.
    Leach AW; Mumford JD
    Environ Pollut; 2008 Jan; 151(1):139-47. PubMed ID: 17604888
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Biodiversity: Putting a price on nature.
    Marris E
    Nature; 2009 Nov; 462(7271):270-1. PubMed ID: 19924184
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Conservation priorities: what to let go.
    Marris E
    Nature; 2007 Nov; 450(7167):152-5. PubMed ID: 17994058
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The social benefits of restoring water quality in the context of the Water Framework Directive: A comparison of willingness to pay and willingness to accept.
    Del Saz-Salazar S; Hernández-Sancho F; Sala-Garrido R
    Sci Total Environ; 2009 Aug; 407(16):4574-83. PubMed ID: 19473689
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Using ecological-niche modeling as a conservation tool for freshwater species: live-bearing fishes in central Mexico.
    Domínguez-Domínguez O; Martínez-Meyer E; Zambrano L; De León GP
    Conserv Biol; 2006 Dec; 20(6):1730-9. PubMed ID: 17181808
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Measurement and meaningfulness in conservation science.
    Wolman AG
    Conserv Biol; 2006 Dec; 20(6):1626-34. PubMed ID: 17181798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.