These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

115 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16646780)

  • 1. Sampling correction in pedigree analysis.
    Ginsburg E; Malkin I; Elston RC
    Stat Appl Genet Mol Biol; 2003; 2():Article2. PubMed ID: 16646780
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Sampling correction in linkage analysis.
    Ginsburg E; Malkin I; Elston RC
    Genet Epidemiol; 2004 Sep; 27(2):87-96. PubMed ID: 15305325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Ascertainment and goodness of fit of variance component models for pedigree data.
    Boehnke M; Lange K
    Prog Clin Biol Res; 1984; 147():173-92. PubMed ID: 6547532
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Ascertainment correction for Markov chain Monte Carlo segregation and linkage analysis of a quantitative trait.
    Ma J; Amos CI; Warwick Daw E
    Genet Epidemiol; 2007 Sep; 31(6):594-604. PubMed ID: 17487893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Optimal sampling for pedigree analysis: sequential schemes for sibships.
    Thompson EA
    Biometrics; 1981 Jun; 37(2):313-25. PubMed ID: 7272417
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Investigating the numerical effects of ascertainment bias in linkage analysis: development of methods and preliminary results.
    Slager SL; Vieland VJ
    Genet Epidemiol; 1997; 14(6):1119-24. PubMed ID: 9433634
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A bivariate problem in human genetics: ascertainment of families through a correlated trait.
    Dawson DV; Elston RC
    Am J Med Genet; 1984 Jul; 18(3):435-48. PubMed ID: 6476005
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Planning of sampling for linkage analysis. Sample size and sampling method].
    Aksenovich TI; Ginzburg EKh
    Genetika; 1993 Sep; 29(9):1544-53. PubMed ID: 8276222
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Correcting for nonrandom ascertainment in generalized linear mixed models (GLMMs), fitted using Gibbs sampling.
    Burton PR
    Genet Epidemiol; 2003 Jan; 24(1):24-35. PubMed ID: 12508253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Sampling schemes and ascertainment.
    Thompson EA; Cannings C
    Prog Clin Biol Res; 1979; 32():363-82. PubMed ID: 523478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Correcting for ascertainment.
    Ewens W; Elston RC
    Methods Mol Biol; 2012; 850():187-209. PubMed ID: 22307700
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Likelihood-based approach to estimating twin concordance for dichotomous traits.
    Witte JS; Carlin JB; Hopper JL
    Genet Epidemiol; 1999; 16(3):290-304. PubMed ID: 10096691
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The problem of ascertainment for linkage analysis.
    Vieland VJ; Hodge SE
    Am J Hum Genet; 1996 May; 58(5):1072-84. PubMed ID: 8651268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Inherent intractability of the ascertainment problem for pedigree data: a general likelihood framework.
    Vieland VJ; Hodge SE
    Am J Hum Genet; 1995 Jan; 56(1):33-43. PubMed ID: 7825595
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Segregation analysis of 159 soft tissue sarcoma kindreds: comparison of fixed and sequential sampling schemes.
    Bondy ML; Lustbader ED; Strom SS; Strong LC
    Genet Epidemiol; 1992; 9(5):291-304. PubMed ID: 1427019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A nonparametric method for penetrance function estimation.
    Alarcon F; Bonaïti-Pellié C; Harari-Kermadec H
    Genet Epidemiol; 2009 Jan; 33(1):38-44. PubMed ID: 18618769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Logistic regression methods for retrospective case-control studies using complex sampling procedures.
    Fears TR; Brown CC
    Biometrics; 1986 Dec; 42(4):955-60. PubMed ID: 3814735
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Ascertainment models incorporating effects of variable age of onset.
    Dawson DV
    Am J Med Genet; 1994 Dec; 53(4):340-7. PubMed ID: 7864043
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The effects of conditioning on probands to correct for multiple ascertainment.
    Boehnke M; Greenberg DA
    Am J Hum Genet; 1984 Nov; 36(6):1298-308. PubMed ID: 6517053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Formalizing the correlative selection of pedigrees].
    Ginzburg EKh
    Genetika; 1993 Aug; 29(8):1391-3. PubMed ID: 8405979
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.