64 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16646786)
1. An empirical bayesian method for differential expression studies using one-channel microarray data.
Lin Y; Reynolds P; Feingold E
Stat Appl Genet Mol Biol; 2003; 2():Article8. PubMed ID: 16646786
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Linear models and empirical bayes methods for assessing differential expression in microarray experiments.
Smyth GK
Stat Appl Genet Mol Biol; 2004; 3():Article3. PubMed ID: 16646809
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Statistical analysis of microarray data: a Bayesian approach.
Gottardo R; Pannucci JA; Kuske CR; Brettin T
Biostatistics; 2003 Oct; 4(4):597-620. PubMed ID: 14557114
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Selection of differentially expressed genes in microarray data analysis.
Chen JJ; Wang SJ; Tsai CA; Lin CJ
Pharmacogenomics J; 2007 Jun; 7(3):212-20. PubMed ID: 16940966
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Variance component estimation for mixed model analysis of cDNA microarray data.
Sarholz B; Piepho HP
Biom J; 2008 Dec; 50(6):927-39. PubMed ID: 19035549
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Assessing differential gene expression with small sample sizes in oligonucleotide arrays using a mean-variance model.
Hu J; Wright FA
Biometrics; 2007 Mar; 63(1):41-9. PubMed ID: 17447928
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Quality optimised analysis of general paired microarray experiments.
Kristiansson E; Sjögren A; Rudemo M; Nerman O
Stat Appl Genet Mol Biol; 2006; 5():Article10. PubMed ID: 16646864
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Empirical bayes methods and false discovery rates for microarrays.
Efron B; Tibshirani R
Genet Epidemiol; 2002 Jun; 23(1):70-86. PubMed ID: 12112249
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Accurate ranking of differentially expressed genes by a distribution-free shrinkage approach.
Opgen-Rhein R; Strimmer K
Stat Appl Genet Mol Biol; 2007; 6():Article9. PubMed ID: 17402924
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Improved detection of differentially expressed genes through incorporation of gene locations.
Xiao G; Reilly C; Khodursky AB
Biometrics; 2009 Sep; 65(3):805-14. PubMed ID: 19173705
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Empirical bayes microarray ANOVA and grouping cell lines by equal expression levels.
Lönnstedt I; Rimini R; Nilsson P
Stat Appl Genet Mol Biol; 2005; 4():Article7. PubMed ID: 16646860
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Changes in gene expression induced by chemoradiation in advanced cervical carcinoma: a microarray study of RTOG C-0128.
Zempolich K; Fuhrman C; Milash B; Flinner R; Greven K; Ryu J; Forbes A; Kerlin K; Nichols RC; Gaffney DK
Gynecol Oncol; 2008 May; 109(2):275-9. PubMed ID: 18299147
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Powers of multiple-testing procedures for identification of genes significantly differentially expressed in microarray experiments.
Tan YD; Yan HM
Yi Chuan Xue Bao; 2006 Dec; 33(12):1132-40. PubMed ID: 17185174
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Independent component analysis-based penalized discriminant method for tumor classification using gene expression data.
Huang DS; Zheng CH
Bioinformatics; 2006 Aug; 22(15):1855-62. PubMed ID: 16709589
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Correcting the estimated level of differential expression for gene selection bias: application to a microarray study.
Bickel DR
Stat Appl Genet Mol Biol; 2008; 7(1):Article10. PubMed ID: 18384263
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. An investigation of two multivariate permutation methods for controlling the false discovery proportion.
Korn EL; Li MC; McShane LM; Simon R
Stat Med; 2007 Oct; 26(24):4428-40. PubMed ID: 17357994
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. CLEAR-test: combining inference for differential expression and variability in microarray data analysis.
Valls J; Grau M; Solé X; Hernández P; Montaner D; Dopazo J; Peinado MA; Capellá G; Moreno V; Pujana MA
J Biomed Inform; 2008 Feb; 41(1):33-45. PubMed ID: 17597009
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Correlation between gene expression levels and limitations of the empirical bayes methodology for finding differentially expressed genes.
Qiu X; Klebanov L; Yakovlev A
Stat Appl Genet Mol Biol; 2005; 4():Article34. PubMed ID: 16646853
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Empirical bayes estimation of a sparse vector of gene expression changes.
Erickson S; Sabatti C
Stat Appl Genet Mol Biol; 2005; 4():Article22. PubMed ID: 16646840
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Selection and validation of normalization methods for c-DNA microarrays using within-array replications.
Fan J; Niu Y
Bioinformatics; 2007 Sep; 23(18):2391-8. PubMed ID: 17660210
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
