These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

67 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16646824)

  • 1. Error-rate and decision-theoretic methods of multiple testing: which genes have high objective probabilities of differential expression?
    Bickel DR
    Stat Appl Genet Mol Biol; 2004; 3():Article8. PubMed ID: 16646824
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Augmentation procedures for control of the generalized family-wise error rate and tail probabilities for the proportion of false positives.
    van der Laan MJ; Dudoit S; Pollard KS
    Stat Appl Genet Mol Biol; 2004; 3():Article15. PubMed ID: 16646793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Multiple testing. Part I. Single-step procedures for control of general type I error rates.
    Dudoit S; van der Laan MJ; Pollard KS
    Stat Appl Genet Mol Biol; 2004; 3():Article13. PubMed ID: 16646791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A moment-based method for estimating the proportion of true null hypotheses and its application to microarray gene expression data.
    Lai Y
    Biostatistics; 2007 Oct; 8(4):744-55. PubMed ID: 17244594
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Cluster formation as a measure of interpretability in multiple testing.
    Shaffer JP
    Biom J; 2008 Oct; 50(5):852-60. PubMed ID: 18932143
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Empirical bayes estimation of a sparse vector of gene expression changes.
    Erickson S; Sabatti C
    Stat Appl Genet Mol Biol; 2005; 4():Article22. PubMed ID: 16646840
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Estimating the false discovery rate using nonparametric deconvolution.
    van de Wiel MA; Kim KI
    Biometrics; 2007 Sep; 63(3):806-15. PubMed ID: 17825012
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Implementing a decision-theoretic design in clinical trials: why and how?
    Palmer CR; Shahumyan H
    Stat Med; 2007 Nov; 26(27):4939-57. PubMed ID: 17582801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Empirical Bayes and resampling based multiple testing procedure controlling tail probability of the proportion of false positives.
    van der Laan MJ; Birkner MD; Hubbard AE
    Stat Appl Genet Mol Biol; 2005; 4():Article29. PubMed ID: 16646847
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. An improved nonparametric approach for detecting differentially expressed genes with replicated microarray data.
    Zhang S
    Stat Appl Genet Mol Biol; 2006; 5():Article30. PubMed ID: 17402914
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Identification of differentially expressed genes and false discovery rate in microarray studies.
    Gusnanto A; Calza S; Pawitan Y
    Curr Opin Lipidol; 2007 Apr; 18(2):187-93. PubMed ID: 17353668
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Monitoring rare serious adverse events from a new treatment and testing for a difference from historical controls.
    Fay MP; Huang CY; Twum-Danso NA
    Clin Trials; 2007; 4(6):598-610. PubMed ID: 18042569
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Semi-parametric differential expression analysis via partial mixture estimation.
    Rossell D; Guerra R; Scott C
    Stat Appl Genet Mol Biol; 2008; 7(1):Article15. PubMed ID: 18454730
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Gene Ontology analysis in multiple gene clusters under multiple hypothesis testing framework.
    Zhong S; Xie D
    Artif Intell Med; 2007 Oct; 41(2):105-15. PubMed ID: 17913480
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Correcting the estimated level of differential expression for gene selection bias: application to a microarray study.
    Bickel DR
    Stat Appl Genet Mol Biol; 2008; 7(1):Article10. PubMed ID: 18384263
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A generalized Sidak-Holm procedure and control of generalized error rates under independence.
    Guo W; Romano J
    Stat Appl Genet Mol Biol; 2007; 6():Article3. PubMed ID: 17402918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Quick calculation for sample size while controlling false discovery rate with application to microarray analysis.
    Liu P; Hwang JT
    Bioinformatics; 2007 Mar; 23(6):739-46. PubMed ID: 17237060
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The influence of the detection paradigm in recording auditory steady-state responses.
    Luts H; Van Dun B; Alaerts J; Wouters J
    Ear Hear; 2008 Aug; 29(4):638-50. PubMed ID: 18469712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Bayesian multiple testing procedures for hotspot identification.
    Miranda-Moreno LF; Labbe A; Fu L
    Accid Anal Prev; 2007 Nov; 39(6):1192-201. PubMed ID: 17920843
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Inference on the limiting false discovery rate and the p-value threshold parameter assuming weak dependence between gene expression levels within subject.
    Heller G; Qin J
    Stat Appl Genet Mol Biol; 2007; 6():Article14. PubMed ID: 17542776
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.