These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

164 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16646847)

  • 1. Empirical Bayes and resampling based multiple testing procedure controlling tail probability of the proportion of false positives.
    van der Laan MJ; Birkner MD; Hubbard AE
    Stat Appl Genet Mol Biol; 2005; 4():Article29. PubMed ID: 16646847
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Quantile-function based null distribution in resampling based multiple testing.
    van der Laan MJ; Hubbard AE
    Stat Appl Genet Mol Biol; 2006; 5():Article14. PubMed ID: 17049025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Augmentation procedures for control of the generalized family-wise error rate and tail probabilities for the proportion of false positives.
    van der Laan MJ; Dudoit S; Pollard KS
    Stat Appl Genet Mol Biol; 2004; 3():Article15. PubMed ID: 16646793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Multiple testing. Part I. Single-step procedures for control of general type I error rates.
    Dudoit S; van der Laan MJ; Pollard KS
    Stat Appl Genet Mol Biol; 2004; 3():Article13. PubMed ID: 16646791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Multiple testing and data adaptive regression: an application to HIV-1 sequence data.
    Birkner MD; Sinisi SE; van der Laan MJ
    Stat Appl Genet Mol Biol; 2005; 4():Article8. PubMed ID: 16646861
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A method to increase the power of multiple testing procedures through sample splitting.
    Rubin D; Dudoit S; van der Laan M
    Stat Appl Genet Mol Biol; 2006; 5():Article19. PubMed ID: 17049030
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Resampling-based empirical Bayes multiple testing procedures for controlling generalized tail probability and expected value error rates: focus on the false discovery rate and simulation study.
    Dudoit S; Gilbert HN; van der Laan MJ
    Biom J; 2008 Oct; 50(5):716-44. PubMed ID: 18932138
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Wavelet thresholding with bayesian false discovery rate control.
    Tadesse MG; Ibrahim JG; Vannucci M; Gentleman R
    Biometrics; 2005 Mar; 61(1):25-35. PubMed ID: 15737075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Multiple testing. Part II. Step-down procedures for control of the family-wise error rate.
    van der Laan MJ; Dudoit S; Pollard KS
    Stat Appl Genet Mol Biol; 2004; 3():Article14. PubMed ID: 16646792
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Semi-parametric differential expression analysis via partial mixture estimation.
    Rossell D; Guerra R; Scott C
    Stat Appl Genet Mol Biol; 2008; 7(1):Article15. PubMed ID: 18454730
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A generalized Sidak-Holm procedure and control of generalized error rates under independence.
    Guo W; Romano J
    Stat Appl Genet Mol Biol; 2007; 6():Article3. PubMed ID: 17402918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A moment-based method for estimating the proportion of true null hypotheses and its application to microarray gene expression data.
    Lai Y
    Biostatistics; 2007 Oct; 8(4):744-55. PubMed ID: 17244594
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A review of modern multiple hypothesis testing, with particular attention to the false discovery proportion.
    Farcomeni A
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2008 Aug; 17(4):347-88. PubMed ID: 17698936
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Nonparametric bayesian estimation of positive false discovery rates.
    Tang Y; Ghosal S; Roy A
    Biometrics; 2007 Dec; 63(4):1126-34. PubMed ID: 17501943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Cluster formation as a measure of interpretability in multiple testing.
    Shaffer JP
    Biom J; 2008 Oct; 50(5):852-60. PubMed ID: 18932143
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison of methods for estimating the number of true null hypotheses in multiplicity testing.
    Hsueh HM; Chen JJ; Kodell RL
    J Biopharm Stat; 2003 Nov; 13(4):675-89. PubMed ID: 14584715
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Sample size calculations for controlling the distribution of false discovery proportion in microarray experiments.
    Oura T; Matsui S; Kawakami K
    Biostatistics; 2009 Oct; 10(4):694-705. PubMed ID: 19628638
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The optimal discovery procedure in multiple significance testing: an empirical Bayes approach.
    Noma H; Matsui S
    Stat Med; 2012 Jan; 31(2):165-76. PubMed ID: 21969277
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. On the operational characteristics of the Benjamini and Hochberg False Discovery Rate procedure.
    Green GH; Diggle PJ
    Stat Appl Genet Mol Biol; 2007; 6():Article27. PubMed ID: 18052910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Multiple test procedures using an upper bound of the number of true hypotheses and their use for evaluating high-dimensional EEG data.
    Hemmelmann C; Ziegler A; Guiard V; Weiss S; Walther M; Vollandt R
    J Neurosci Methods; 2008 May; 170(1):158-64. PubMed ID: 18279970
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.